|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-30-10 07:30 AM Original message |
US Economy Grows in Second Quarter, GDP up 2.4% |
Edited on Fri Jul-30-10 07:34 AM by tritsofme
In line with expections, still pretty anemic growth.
Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 2.4 percent in the second quarter of 2010, (that is, from the first quarter to the second quarter), according to the "advance" estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the first quarter, real GDP increased 3.7 percent. The Bureau emphasized that the second-quarter advance estimate released today is based on source data that are incomplete or subject to further revision by the source agency (see the box on page 3). The "second" estimate for the second quarter, based on more complete data, will be released on August 27, 2010. __________________ BOX.-- The estimates released today reflect the regular annual revision to the national income and product accounts (NIPAs), beginning with the estimates for the first quarter of 2007. Annual revisions, which are usually released in July, incorporate source data that are more complete, more detailed, and otherwise more reliable than those previously available. This release includes the revised quarterly estimates of GDP, corporate profits, and personal income and provides an overview of the effects of the revision. The August 2010 Survey of Current Business will contain NIPA tables and an article describing the revisions. The revised estimates will be available on BEA’s Web site at www.bea.gov. ___________________ FOOTNOTE.--Quarterly estimates are expressed at seasonally adjusted annual rates, unless otherwise specified. Quarter-to-quarter dollar changes are differences between these published estimates. Percent changes are calculated from unrounded data and are annualized. “Real” estimates are in chained (2005) dollars. Price indexes are chain-type measures. This news release is available on BEA’s Web site along with the Technical Note and Highlights related to this release. ____________________ The increase in real GDP in the second quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from nonresidential fixed investment, exports, personal consumption expenditures, private inventory investment, federal government spending, and residential fixed investment. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased. The deceleration in real GDP in the second quarter primarily reflected an acceleration in imports and a deceleration in private inventory investment that were partly offset by an upturn in residential fixed investment, an acceleration in nonresidential fixed investment, an upturn in state and local government spending, and an acceleration in federal government spending. Final sales of computers added 0.04 percentage point to the second-quarter change in real GDP after adding 0.10 percentage point to the first-quarter change. Motor vehicle output subtracted 0.01 percentage point from the second-quarter change in real GDP after adding 0.74 percentage point to the first-quarter change. The price index for gross domestic purchases, which measures prices paid by U.S. residents, increased 0.1 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 2.1 percent in the first. Excluding food and energy prices, the price index for gross domestic purchases increased 0.9 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 1.6 percent in the first. Real personal consumption expenditures increased 1.6 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 1.9 percent in the first. Durable goods increased 7.5 percent, compared with an increase of 8.8 percent. Nondurable goods increased 1.6 percent, compared with an increase of 4.2 percent. Services increased 0.8 percent, compared with an increase of 0.1 percent. Real nonresidential fixed investment increased 17.0 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 7.8 percent in the first. Nonresidential structures increased 5.2 percent, in contrast to a decrease of 17.8 percent. Equipment and software increased 21.9 percent, compared with an increase of 20.4 percent. Real residential fixed investment increased 27.9 percent, in contrast to a decrease of 12.3 percent. Real exports of goods and services increased 10.3 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 11.4 percent in the first. Real imports of goods and services increased 28.8 percent, compared with an increase of 11.2 percent. Real federal government consumption expenditures and gross investment increased 9.2 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 1.8 percent in the first. National defense increased 7.4 percent, compared with an increase of 0.4 percent. Nondefense increased 13.0 percent, compared with an increase of 5.0 percent. Real state and local government consumption expenditures and gross investment increased 1.3 percent, in contrast to a decrease of 3.8 percent. The change in real private inventories added 1.05 percentage points to the second-quarter change in real GDP after adding 2.64 percentage points to the first-quarter change. Private businesses increased inventories $75.7 billion in the second quarter, following an increase of $44.1 billion in the first quarter and a decrease of $36.7 billion in the fourth. Real final sales of domestic product -- GDP less change in private inventories -- increased 1.3 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 1.1 percent in the first. Gross domestic purchases Real gross domestic purchases -- purchases by U.S. residents of goods and services wherever produced -- increased 5.1 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 3.9 percent in the first. Disposition of personal income Current-dollar personal income increased $123.9 billion (4.1 percent) in the second quarter, compared with an increase of $122.8 billion (4.1 percent) in the first. Personal current taxes increased $1.3 billion in the second quarter, compared with an increase of $19.6 billion in the first. Disposable personal income increased $122.6 billion (4.4 percent) in the second quarter, compared with an increase of $103.3 billion (3.8 percent) in the first. Real disposable personal income increased 4.4 percent, compared with an increase of 1.7 percent. Personal outlays increased $36.6 billion (1.4 percent) in the second quarter, compared with an increase of $98.2 billion (3.8 percent) in the first. Personal saving -- disposable personal income less personal outlays -- was $707.1 billion in the second quarter, compared with $621.1 billion in the first. The personal saving rate -- saving as a percentage of disposable personal income -- was 6.2 percent in the second quarter, compared with 5.5 percent in the first. For a comparison of personal saving in BEA’s national income and product accounts with personal saving in the Federal Reserve Board’s flow of funds accounts and data on changes in net worth, go to http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/Nipa- Frb.asp. Current-dollar GDP Current-dollar GDP -- the market value of the nation's output of goods and services -- increased 4.3 percent, or $151.3 billion, in the second quarter to a level of $14,597.7 billion. In the first quarter, current-dollar GDP increased 4.8 percent, or $169.1 billion. _______________ BOX.-- Information on the assumptions used for unavailable source data is provided in a technical note that is posted with the news releae on BEA's Web site. Within a few days after the release, a detailed "Key Source Data and Assumptions" file is posted on the Web site. In the middle of each month, an analysis of the current quarterly estimate of GDP and related series is made available on the Web site; click on Survey of Current Business, "GDP and the Economy." _______________ Revision of the National Income and Product Accounts The revised estimates, which begin for most statistics with 2007, reflect the results of the regular annual revision of the national income and product accounts (NIPAs). These revisions, usually made each July, incorporate newly available and more comprehensive source data, as well as improved estimating methodologies. In this annual revision, the notable revisions primarily reflect the incorporation of newly available and revised source data. For example, the revised estimates of profits reflect newly available Internal Revenue Service tabulations of tax returns for corporations for 2008 and revised tabulations for 2007. A table showing the major current-dollar revisions and their sources for each component of GDP, national income, and personal income will be published in the August 2010 issue of the Survey of Current Business. Because of the additional data shown, tables 3, 11, and 12 are each divided into two separate tables -- 3A and 3B, 11A and 11B, and 12A and 12B. There are also a number of special tables that compare the revised and previously published estimates for selected periods: table 1A shows the percent change in real GDP and related measures; table 1B shows revisions to current-dollar GDP, to national income, and to disposition of personal income; table 2A shows contributions to the percent change in real GDP; table 4A shows the percent change in the chain-type price indexes for GDP and related measures; and table 12C shows revisions to corporate profits by industry. This section of the release discusses the highlights of the revisions and describes their sources. Summary of revisions * For 2006-2009, real GDP decreased at an average annual rate of 0.2 percent; in the previously published estimates, the growth rate of real GDP was 0.0 percent. From the fourth quarter of 2006 to the first quarter of 2010, real GDP increased at an average annual rate of 0.2 percent; in the previously published estimates, real GDP had increased at an average annual rate of 0.4 percent. * For the revision period, the change in real GDP was revised down for all 3 years: 0.2 percentage point for 2007, 0.4 percentage point for 2008, and 0.2 percentage point for 2009. * The downward revisions to the annual estimates for 2007 and 2009 reflect partly offsetting revisions to the quarters within a year. For example, for 2009, the annual rate of change in GDP for the first quarter was revised up 1.5 percentage points from a large decrease to a smaller decrease, while the growth rates for the third and fourth quarters were each revised down 0.6 percentage point. The second quarter of 2009 was unrevised. For 2008, the downward revision to the change in real GDP reflects downward revisions for the second, third, and fourth quarters. * For the 13 quarters from the first quarter of 2007 to the first quarter of 2010, the average revision (without regard to sign) was 0.7 percentage point. The revisions did not change the direction of the change in real GDP (increase or decrease) for any quarter. * For 2006-2009, the average annual rate of growth of real disposable personal income was revised up 0.3 percentage point, from 1.2 percent to 1.5 percent. * From the fourth quarter of 2006 to the first quarter of 2010, the average annual rate of increase in the price index for gross domestic purchases was revised down from 2.0 percent to 1.9 percent. The average annual rate of increase in the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE) was revised up from 2.1 percent to 2.2 percent, and the “core” PCE price index (which excludes food and energy) was revised up from 1.9 percent to 2.0 percent. * For the revision period, national income was revised down for all 3 years: 0.4 percent for 2007, 0.6 percent for 2008, and 0.4 percent for 2009. * For the revision period, corporate profits was revised down for all 3 years: 2.0 percent for 2007, 7.2 percent for 2008, and 3.9 percent for 2009. Revisions to 2007-2009 estimates The percent change from the preceding year in real GDP was revised down for all 3 years: from 2.1 percent to 1.9 percent for 2007, from an increase of 0.4 percent to 0.0 percent for 2008, and from a decrease of 2.4 percent to a decrease of 2.6 percent for 2010. For 2007, the largest contributors to the revision to real GDP growth were a downward revision to PCE, an upward revision to imports, and a downward revision to state and local government spending; these revisions were partly offset by upward revisions to inventory investment, to exports, and to nonresidential fixed investment. For 2008, the largest contributors to the revision were a downward revision to nonresidential fixed investment, a downward revision to inventory investment, and an upward revision to imports; these revisions were partly offset by an upward revision to exports. Within PCE, a downward revision to PCE for goods was mostly offset by an upward revision to PCE for services. For 2009, the largest contributors to the revision were downward revisions to PCE, to state and local government spending, and to residential fixed investment; these revisions were partly offset by upward revisions to inventory investment and to nonresidential fixed investment, and a downward revision to imports. The revision to PCE was in PCE for services. The percent change from fourth quarter to fourth quarter in real GDP was revised down from 2.5 percent to 2.3 percent for 2007, was revised down from a decrease of 1.9 percent to a decrease of 2.8 percent for 2008, and was revised up from an increase of 0.1 percent to an increase of 0.2 percent for 2009. For the period of contraction from the fourth quarter of 2007 to the second quarter of 2009, real GDP decreased at an average annual rate of 2.8 percent; in the previously published estimates, it had decreased 2.5 percent. The percent change from the preceding year in real gross domestic income (GDI) was revised down from 0.6 percent to 0.1 percent for 2007, was revised down from a decrease of 0.4 percent to a decrease of 0.8 percent for 2008, and was revised up from a decrease of 3.2 percent to a decrease of 2.9 percent for 2009. The percent change from the preceding year in the price index for gross domestic purchases was unrevised at 2.9 percent for 2007, was unrevised at 3.2 percent for 2008, and was revised down from a change of 0.0 percent to a decrease of 0.2 percent for 2009. For the quarters of 2007 to 2009, the percent change in the price index was revised down for five quarters and was revised up for seven quarters; the largest downward revision was 0.8 percentage point (for the fourth quarter of 2007). Current-dollar GDP was revised down for all 3 years: $15.8 billion, or 0.1 percent, for 2007; $72.3 billion, or 0.5 percent, for 2008; and $137.3 billion, or 1.0 percent, for 2009. The percent change from the preceding year was revised down from 5.1 percent to 4.9 percent for 2007; was revised down from 2.6 percent to 2.2 percent for 2008; and was revised down from a decrease of 1.3 percent to a decrease of 1.7 percent for 2009. Current-dollar gross national product (GNP) (GDP plus net receipts of income from the rest of the world) was revised down $8.2 billion, or 0.1 percent, for 2007; was revised down $39.7 billion, or 0.3 percent, for 2008; and was revised down $95.9 billion, or 0.7 percent, for 2009. Net receipts of income was revised up for all 3 years: $7.5 billion for 2007, $32.6 billion for 2008, and $41.3 billion for 2009. The revisions to net receipts of income -- which affect GNP, national income, corporate profits, net interest and miscellaneous payments, and personal income receipts on assets -- resulted from the revisions to BEA's international transactions accounts (ITAs) that were released in June. Although the revisions to the ITAs extended back to 1999, the revisions prior to 2007 were not incorporated into the NIPAs at this time. (An article describing the revisions to the ITAs was published in the July 2010 issue of the Survey of Current Business.) National income was revised down for all 3 years: $51.8 billion, or 0.4 percent, for 2007; $77.4 billion, or 0.6 percent, for 2008; and $55.0 billion, or 0.4 percent, for 2009. For 2007, downward revisions to corporate profits and to supplements to wages and salaries were partly offset by an upward revision to wages and salaries. For 2008, downward revisions to corporate profits and to the current surplus of government enterprises were partly offset by upward revisions to wages and salaries, to rental income of persons, and to supplements to wages and salaries. For 2009, downward revisions to corporate profits and to nonfarm proprietors’ income were partly offset by an upward revision to supplements to wages and salaries. Corporate profits from current production -- profits before tax with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments -- was revised down for all 3 years: $31.1 billion, or 2.0 percent, for 2007; $97.6 billion, or 7.2 percent, for 2008; and $50.9 billion, or 3.9 percent, for 2009. For all 3 years, downward revisions to corporate profits before tax more than accounted for the revision. These downward revisions were partly offset by upward revisions to the capital consumption adjustment. For 2007 and 2009, downward revisions to profits of domestic financial and domestic nonfinancial corporations were partly offset by an upward revision to profits from the rest of the world. For 2008, downward revisions to profits of domestic financial corporations was partly offset by upward revisions to profits of domestic nonfinancial corporations and to profits from the rest of the world. Personal income was revised up for all 3 years: $18.2 billion, or 0.2 percent, for 2007; $152.3 billion, or 1.2 percent, for 2008; and $155.9 billion, or 1.3 percent, for 2009. For 2007, upward revisions to personal dividend income and to wages and salaries were partly offset by a downward revision to supplements to wages and salaries. For 2008, upward revisions to personal dividend income, to wages and salaries, to rental income of persons, and to supplements to wages and salaries were partly offset by a downward revision to nonfarm proprietors’ income. For 2009, upward revisions to personal dividend income, to supplements to wages and salaries, and to government social benefits to persons were partly offset by a downward revision to nonfarm proprietors’ income and to personal interest income. Disposable personal income (DPI) (personal income less personal current taxes) was revised up all 3 years: $20.5 billion, or 0.2 percent, for 2007; $146.5 billion, or 1.4 percent, for 2008; and $117.6 billion, or 1.1 percent, for 2009. Personal current taxes was revised down $2.2 billion for 2007, was revised up $5.8 billion for 2008, and was revised up $38.3 billion for 2009. The percent change from the preceding year in real DPI was revised up from 2.2 percent to 2.3 percent for 2007, was revised up from 0.5 percent to 1.7 percent for 2008, and was revised down from 0.8 percent to 0.6 percent for 2009. Personal outlays -- PCE, personal interest payments, and personal current transfer payments -- was revised down for all 3 years: $15.4 billion for 2007, $15.0 billion for 2008, and $79.1 billion for 2009. For all 3 years, downward revisions to PCE more than accounted for the revisions to personal outlays. The personal saving rate (personal saving as a percentage of DPI) was revised up for all 3 years: from 1.7 percent to 2.1 percent for 2007, from 2.7 percent to 4.1 percent for 2008, and from 4.2 percent to 5.9 percent for 2009. The statistical discrepancy is current-dollar GDP less current-dollar gross domestic income (GDI). It arises because most components of GDP and of GDI are estimated independently. GDP measures final expenditures -- the sum of consumer spending, private investment, net exports, and government spending. GDI measures the incomes earned in the production of GDP. In concept, GDP is equal to GDI. In practice, they differ because they are estimated using different source data and different methods. As a result of the annual revision, the statistical discrepancy as a percentage of GDP was revised from a negative 0.1 percent to a positive 0.2 percent for 2007, was revised up from 0.7 percent to 1.0 percent for 2008, and was revised down from 1.5 percent to 1.3 percent for 2009. For 2007 and 2008, the revisions to the discrepancy reflected downward revisions to GDP that were smaller than the downward revisions to GDI. For 2009, the revision to the discrepancy reflected a downward revision to GDP that was larger than the downward revision to GDI. New source data The annual revision incorporated data from the following major federal statistical sources: Census Bureau new and revised manufacturing economic census data for 2007; Census Bureau annual survey of manufactures for 2008; Census Bureau annual surveys of merchant wholesale trade and of retail trade for 2007 (revised) and for 2008; Census Bureau revised monthly indicators of manufactures, of merchant wholesale trade, and of retail trade for 2007-2009; Census Bureau annual surveys of services for 2007 (revised), 2008 (revised), and 2009 (preliminary), and of state and local government finances for fiscal years 2006 (revised), 2007 (revised), and 2008 (preliminary); Census Bureau monthly survey of construction spending (value put in place) for 2007-2009 (revised); Census Bureau quarterly services survey for 2007-2009 (revised); Census Bureau current population survey/housing vacancy survey for 2009; federal government budget data for fiscal years 2009 and 2010; Internal Revenue Service tabulations of tax returns for corporations for 2007 (revised) and 2008 (preliminary) and for sole proprietorships and partnerships for 2008; Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) quarterly census of employment and wages for 2007-2009 (revised); new BLS occupational employment survey data for 2009; Department of Agriculture farm statistics for 2007-2009; and BEA's ITAs for 2007-2009 (revised). Changes in methodology The annual revision also incorporated improvements to estimating methodologies, including the following: * Beginning with the first quarter of 2010, data from the Census Bureau’s expanded quarterly services survey (QSS) are incorporated into the quarterly estimates of personal consumption expenditures (PCE) categories for health care, transportation, recreation, and other services. As a result, the percentage of quarterly PCE services that are based on the QSS has increased from 16 percent to 39 percent. * Quality-adjusted communications equipment price indexes from the Federal Reserve Board are incorporated into the estimates of communication equipment within private fixed investment and into the estimates of “other” capital goods within exports and imports of goods. The Federal Reserve Board’s price index for data networking equipment, currently used in the estimates of communication equipment within private fixed investment, is incorporated into the estimates of “other” capital goods within exports and imports. * The deflator for command-basis GNP -- a measure of the goods and services produced by the U.S. economy in terms of the purchasing power of the income generated from those goods and services -- has changed to the price index for gross domestic purchases, which better reflects the uses rather than the sources of income. In addition, the gross domestic purchases index is used to deflate the trade balance in calculating command-basis GDP, which was not previously published. These changes are carried back to 1929 for annual estimates and to 1947 for quarterly estimates. * The NIPA measures of saving and investment are improved. The NIPA tables are expanded to provide additional detail on national saving and investment, such as estimates of net lending and borrowing by sector. Migrants’ transfers are excluded from the capital account beginning with 1982. (This definitional change is consistent with the change made in the annual revision of BEA’s international transactions accounts that was released in June.) * Other definitional changes in the international transactions accounts, such as the reclassification of certain goods and services, are incorporated in the NIPAs beginning with 2007. These reclassifications have little effect on overall GDP, though they affect the goods and services composition of exports and imports. BEA's national, international, regional, and industry estimates; the Survey of Current Business; and BEA news releases are available without charge on BEA's Web site at www.bea.gov. By visiting the site, you can also subscribe to receive free e-mail summaries of BEA releases and announcements. * * * Next release – August 27, 2010, at 8:30 A.M. EDT for: Gross Domestic Product: Second Quarter 2010 (Second Estimate) Corporate Profits: Second Quarter (Preliminary Estimate) http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-30-10 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah in high 3s would be better but growing is growing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-30-10 07:56 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Q1 is revised up to 3.7% |
Today was a benchmark revision.
Which is good in the sense there was higher growth earlier in the year, but it makes the drop off of in Q2 all the more troubling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-30-10 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
2. Personal savings rate! |
This is good. Unwinding leverage. Saving money. Poised for solid growth.
|
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-30-10 07:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Sadly this is the worst time to save. |
For 3 decades American's didn't save. They didn't save durring the super boom years when there was no reason not to save.
Even worse via second mortgages & HELOCs many had a negative savings rate for decades straight. Now when we need consumption Americans are saving. That being said I am saving & paying down debt. :) Tragedy of the commons is hard to break. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-30-10 09:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. But we are Americans |
So most likely, we are "saving up".
|
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-30-10 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
3. compare and contrast with |
Edited on Fri Jul-30-10 07:56 AM by ixion
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8845661
Interesting how the economy can grow with consumer spending down and the companies still shedding jobs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-30-10 08:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. July is Q3. |
The second half of the year is going to be tougher to pull in positive numbers.
Jan, Feb, Mar - Q1 Apr, May, Jun - Q2 Jul, Aug, Sep - Q3 Oct, Nov, Dec - Q4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC