Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DoD Aims To Cut Costs of Future Arms, Not Today's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 07:36 AM
Original message
DoD Aims To Cut Costs of Future Arms, Not Today's
DoD Aims To Cut Costs of Future Arms, Not Today's
By JOHN T. BENNETT
Published: 27 Jul 2010 15:48

The Pentagon's cost-cutting effort is aimed at upcoming programs, not existing ones, senior acquisition officials said July 27 at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington.

Peppered by questions from industry and academic audience members, DoD industrial affairs chief Brett Lambert and others said they have received no direction to cut a specific dollar amount from existing programs; rather, they are overhauling buying guidelines before the U.S. military begins writing specifications and contracts for several new - and expensive - platforms.

Lambert did not directly address concerns about profit caps and cash flow.

He did say that the procurement changes that will be directed by acquisition defense undersecretary Ashton Carter and implemented in September - and subsequent ones perhaps arriving over several years - would be applied not to current programs but new ones such as new nuclear-armed submarines and future blocks of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

Lambert said Defense Secretary Robert Gates has not given his office a specific amount to trim from programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Before a system if fielded, its life cycle costs are already locked in
Requirements and design decisions are the driver for that. The only recourse with fielded/nearly fielded systems is to limit use or buy less. Total ownership or life cycle costs for systems have been a focal point for some time. Not sure how much more they can design out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC