Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:26 PM
Original message
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle."
"All government — indeed, every human benefit and enjoyment, every virtue and every prudent act — is founded on compromise and barter."

-Edmund Burke

So yeah, go ahead and stay at home from the polls in 2010 and 2012. See where that gets you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, nobody stayed home in 2008
and yet it seems like evil is getting whatever the fuck it wants anyway.

So now what? :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. We may have had record turnout in 2008
But loads of people stayed home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. But the record turnout was responding to the message of "Change"
And the hope that a new generation of leadership, embodied in this young black dude with the "funny name" would somehow get us off the path to destruction that this country had been on for the previous 30 years, certainly at an accelerated pace since 12/12/2000.

I don't think anybody realistically expected it all to end overnight. But we expected signficant steps in the proper direction. And despite the spin, despite the rhetoric, despite the bullshit, that is NOT what we're seeing.

Mandatory payments to a criminal insurance industry, is a huge step in the WRONG direction.

Escalating the war in Afghanistan was a huge step in the WRONG direction.

Even THINKING about fucking with Social Security is a leap off the goddamn cliff in the WRONG direction.

This is evil not done by the Republican "bad men" but by the men (and women) that we were told were "good".


So again, I ask the question: Now what? :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. If I take your premise as fact....
Then the good must associate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm staying home.
Edited on Sat Jul-24-10 04:32 PM by LWolf
But then I, like every other voter in my state, vote from home.

Why would you think people are going to abstain from voting?

Do you really mean that you think they won't vote the way you want them to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You've missed all the liberal bloggers saying they will stay home in 2010?
I suspect that is not the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Yep.
I've missed it. Of course, "staying home" on a censored partisan board, can be a euphemism for other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Which "censored partisan board" do you read?
Or is that a euphemism for ordering pizza?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. This one, of course.
I'm not sure what euphemism you are referring to, though.

It's not against the rules to note that DU is a censored board with a partisan focus. It's openly stated in the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the Quote and the Reminder of who we are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Thanks for the kick.
n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. You can stick your "compromise and barter" where the sun don't shine!
We have very few principles left to barter away!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I choose progress over being progressive any day of the week
I don't care where you stick that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Breitbart is a lying dirtball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. More than that. He is the enemy.
Yet some would rather be "disappointed" in President Obama than fight against the repukes. Sad times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Agreed. Pretty painful to watch actually.
Here we are with an excellent president in place in tough times. Obama is methodically returning the country to health and greatness. It takes time to mend the bone-deep damage caused by Bush/Cheney and their Republicans. But Obama is getting it done. How, one might ask, given the now-demonstrated ingratitude and shallow stupidity on the left and right, did we get so lucky?

With all the Breitbartish deceit coming out of the Republicans, why on earth anyone on the left would have boo to say about Obama is beyond me. I don't agree with everything that is happening with the government, but I know Obama is making things better faster than anyone with a shred of realism would hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that is that people shrug when the rights of others
disappear and say things like "Well, I don't do X and if you don't like the new laws then you should stop doing X"

"OH, you think X is ok to do - well I don't and think it should be restricted, cause freedoms I don't like are not freedoms"

Hear it from both sides all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

- Martin Niemöller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. .


Dear Democratic Base,

When Breitbart came for ACORN
We helped him get them
Because we were politicians

When they came for Van Jones
We did the same thing
Because it's party before principles

And when Breitbart came for Shirley Sherrod
We handed her over as fast as we could
Because well, we're pragmatic

But then we realized they were coming for us
What should we do?

Hugs and kisses from
Your Democratic Party

P.S. Please go to the polls, we're sorry and we promise to change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Except Van Jones quit, he was never fired
And both Van Jones and Sherrod support President Obama.

He is the only thing standing between you and President Palin and you take every opportunity to spit in his face and show that no good deed goes unpunished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. He quit the same way Shirley Sherrod quit
Do you want a longer list? I have one. But I think people get the point.

Please post a link to any post of mine, anywhere, where I have 'spit' in the president's face. That is a lie!

I have and will disagree with him on policies, and agreed with him when he got things right and posted OPs about his successes.

You are not credible, I will waste no more time on this. Party loyalists will be the down fall of this country as they will go along with any policy no matter how bad it is.

Anyone who cares about the Democratic Party will tell them when they are doing wrong. Not to mention it is their duty to do so. Blind loyalty is and always was dangerous to any nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. First they came for the dopers..
But I was not a doper so I remained silent.

The USA has the highest incarceration rate in the world, bar none, Obama has no intention of changing that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gil_Kerlikowske

Richard Gil Kerlikowske (born November 23, 1949) is the current Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, a position generally referred to as the United States "Drug Czar". He assumed office on May 7, 2009.

(...)

In a May 22, 2009 interview on KUOW radio, he said any drug 'legalization' would be "waving the white flag" and that "legalization is off the the charts when it comes to discussion, from my viewpoint" and that "legalization vocabulary doesn't exist for me and it was made clear that it doesn't exist in President Obama's vocabulary." Specifically about marijuana, he said, "It's a dangerous drug" and about the medical use of marijuana, he said, "we will wait for evidence on whether smoked marijuana has any medicinal benefits - those aren't in."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. What are you talking about?
Who is staying home from the polls?

As far as your quote, I don't think that was all Edmund Burke had in mind when he said that.

We just witnessed a perfect example of what he meant this week.

We have learned that all of our war criminals are free from any fear of prosecution. They can now relax and enjoy their ill-gotten fortunes while their victims, those who are still alive, continue to try to get some justice for the torture they endure, if not in this country, then maybe elsewhere.

Which 'good men' made that decision? I know I will not be supporting anyone who decided to remain silent about war crimes. There is no compromise or barter to be tolerated for war crimes, and I doubt very much that Edmund Burke would disagree with me on that.

I don't support war crimes or war criminals and I don't remain silent about egregious acts like this just because of party loyalty.

I will be focusing on Congress, hoping we can get some decent human beings elected and keep the few who are there who did try to stop it all. But I will NOT be working for people who turn a blind eye to war crimes.

It's the least I can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. You have your interpretation of Burke, I have mine
A lot of liberal bloggers have said they would stay home, that is what Van Jones was talking about at the netroots convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Did Edmund Burke support covering up war crimes?
Van Jones is a nice guy, he was betrayed by the WH, but he has risen about that as he cares more about his country. He has urged people to fight and keep fighting for what is right, and no one knows better than he how often this party doesn't do that. So, he's trying to give them a backbone. So
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You just continue doing the least you can do
The rest of us will keep the true evil of Repuke control at bay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. You mean evil like war crimes, torture
dropping bombs on innocents for their resources? Did the Democrats make a statement that they are now against those evils? Last I heard they are not even going to investgate war criminals. Do you agree with that? Allowing those evil doers you say are against, get away with crimes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. I always vote. I'll be voting for the most progressive, anti-war, candidates on my ballot.
Even if I have to write them in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
28. Evil triumphed when their puppets gave Evil the keys to OUR kingdom.
Evil triumphed when they got control of the economic system and gamed it 700 million fold to their advantage.

Evil triumphed when wages were lowered, universal health care was shot down, retirements became privatized, unions were quashed and education bankrupted adults young and old at a 350% profit margin.

Evil triumphed when they bought most mass media and paraded the same 10 neo-con talking points year after year, using 1984 as an instruction manual rather than a work of fiction.

Evil triumphed when they glamorized war from the time we were kids, encouraged meanness and turned life, liberty (or "Freedums") and the pursuit of happiness into a zero sum game.

Evil triumphed when they dictated to us that money is far, far more important than people, love, compassion, honor, loyalty, family and good.

Evil is Shiva, with many, many puppets on each hand that we all listened to and trust with the utmost of faith.

Evil acts like the benefactor, when it's actually the destroyer.

Evil thrives because they made us so ridiculously afraid to stand up to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. The banality of it is disturbing. How those who railed against it
just a few years ago, today have become apologists for it. All because of a letter 'R' or 'D' after the names of the leaders of the party they support.

We are now the flip side of the Freepers ... war, torture, war criminals, all swept away and forgotten about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yawn!
:puffpiece:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC