|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
| JudyInTheHeartland
|
Wed Jun-30-10 07:52 PM Original message |
| Al Gore sex investigation to be re-opened, say Portland police |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| TerribleLarryDingle
|
Wed Jun-30-10 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Oh boy just in time for the elections. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jackpine Radical
|
Wed Jun-30-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. What's Al running for? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TerribleLarryDingle
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 6. Well it's not like |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 26. Deleted message |
| Rosa Luxemburg
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 28. They didn't hound VITTER and his diapers why should they hound Gore |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| earth mom
|
Thu Jul-01-10 01:06 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 38. Your photo is disgusting and does NOT belong here. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| femmocrat
|
Wed Jun-30-10 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Not good. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| virgogal
|
Wed Jun-30-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Yeah,like those ridiculous Edwards rumors. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| liquid diamond
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 23. lol. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| avaistheone1
|
Fri Jul-02-10 08:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 77. Everything that is printed in the National Enquirer is not true. Are their Obama sex escapade |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ter
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. Hmm, maybe Al Gore? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Taverner
|
Wed Jun-30-10 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. It could exonerate him and show the MT for the fraud she might be |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mz Pip
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Evidence? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hay rick
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Too late to get on the Tiger Woods bus... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tempest
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Her story is too good to be true |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gin
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. I listened to the tape...could not listen to the whole thing...she read the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wordpix
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 22. certainly she writes well for a masseuse - sounds like Rover hired a xxx novelist for the job |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Wed Jun-30-10 11:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 35. That thing about Portland being the home of the "Birkenstock Tribe" or some shit |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| chaste labradoodle
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:30 AM Response to Reply #35 |
| 55. No....actually from my morning paper's account |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Thu Jul-01-10 03:15 PM Response to Reply #55 |
| 69. Not buying it... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WillYourVoteBCounted
|
Thu Jul-01-10 12:52 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 37. I for one believe Al to be celibate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stargazer09
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. If I were the Portland police |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pnwmom
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. She claims to have "video surveillance." In a hotel room? Hidden cameras? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| crazyjoe
|
Thu Jul-01-10 06:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 46. and a pair of pant's with al's "goo" on them. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaL
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 52. Why would there be hidden cameras in Gore's hotel room? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 2Design
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Howard Dean and Al Gore born same year and the lies build but are not true |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| politicalmajority
|
Wed Jun-30-10 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. It's a Witch Hunt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| emilyg
|
Wed Jun-30-10 11:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 34. Same was said about Edwards. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| depakid
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. A moneymaker for the tabloid Oregonian! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| thecrow
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Wonder if this is why Al and Tipper are divorcing.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alp227
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 18. LOL I said so too earlier. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kiranon
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. Not very wise to go to a masseuse if you are a public figure. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hugabear
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 25. People get massages all the time. What's wrong with that? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cali
|
Thu Jul-01-10 03:34 AM Response to Reply #25 |
| 40. they do, but if you're a prominent man, it's best not to have a |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Odin2005
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. This stinks of Rove. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| donheld
|
Wed Jun-30-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 32. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| chaste labradoodle
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:34 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 59. What stinks of Rove? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wordpix
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. 4 years later she brings this up just in time for elections - sounds about right |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lindsey
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 27. I agree that it has Kove written all over it. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| David Zephyr
|
Wed Jun-30-10 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. This news story is from Murdoch's NY Post. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Soylent Brice
|
Wed Jun-30-10 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. McCarthyism is alive and well in the Good Ole US of A. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cali
|
Thu Jul-01-10 04:38 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 42. this has zip to do with McCarthy or McCarthyism |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Botany
|
Wed Jun-30-10 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. the act was supposed to have happened in 2006 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hell Hath No Fury
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 60. The victim refused to press charges -- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mbee
|
Wed Jun-30-10 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. We can't investigate 911, stolen elections, regulating energy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cali
|
Thu Jul-01-10 04:39 AM Response to Reply #31 |
| 43. and a local police investigation has just what to do with what you mentioned? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sabrina 1
|
Thu Jul-01-10 04:55 AM Response to Reply #31 |
| 44. Amazing isn't it? You are absolutely correct. We can investigate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TexasObserver
|
Wed Jun-30-10 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. typical GOP dirty tricks |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| musette_sf
|
Thu Jul-01-10 04:14 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 41. Yep. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Junkdrawer
|
Thu Jul-01-10 06:05 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 45. Big Oil's answer to Global Warming: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FVZA_Colonel
|
Thu Jul-01-10 01:46 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 67. This is going to be used to tarnish Gore's advocacy, the science behind Climate Change, and Cap and |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| studio 51 area 54
|
Thu Jul-01-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 64. And it's being reopened because....? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TexasObserver
|
Thu Jul-01-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #64 |
| 65. Sell that story to someone who will buy it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| akbacchus_BC
|
Thu Jul-01-10 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 36. I am wondering who paid her to come forward now, Al Gore is not |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| earth mom
|
Thu Jul-01-10 01:10 AM Response to Reply #36 |
| 39. I wouldn't be surprised if those rethug bastards are worried Gore will run & win because of the BP |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| annabanana
|
Thu Jul-01-10 07:45 AM Response to Reply #36 |
| 48. I think it's important to the Rove "legacy" project to slime Al. . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uncle Joe
|
Thu Jul-01-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 72. It's not just running for office, global warming climate change legislation is up and they want to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Thu Jul-01-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 74. Are you suggesting that there might be rich, powerful entities w/ a vested interest in |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bergie321
|
Thu Jul-01-10 05:13 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 75. Oil |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hubert Flottz
|
Thu Jul-01-10 06:21 AM Response to Original message |
| 47. Maybe Al should run for Gropenator of "Kolley-4-knee-ya" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| okieinpain
|
Thu Jul-01-10 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 49. i do find it a little funny that he distance himself from pres. clinton. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rob H.
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
| 50. I posted this last week, so apologies if you've already seen it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nc4bo
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
| 51. Wonder how much she's been paid to assist in the discrediting of one of the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KamaAina
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
| 53. Portland police have a terrible reputation |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| chaste labradoodle
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:33 AM Response to Reply #53 |
| 57. Yeah, everything under the sun |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 54. Deleted message |
| chaste labradoodle
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:32 AM Response to Reply #54 |
| 56. I looked at your profile... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nc4bo
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:33 AM Response to Reply #54 |
| 58. ? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| chaste labradoodle
|
Thu Jul-01-10 11:44 AM Response to Reply #58 |
| 61. And even if she was supposedly unattractive |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| seabeyond
|
Thu Jul-01-10 12:22 PM Response to Reply #54 |
| 63. and he is hawt? eeew. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hell Hath No Fury
|
Thu Jul-01-10 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 62. Can anyone confirm this? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Thu Jul-01-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 66. Deleted message |
| Dogtown
|
Thu Jul-01-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #66 |
| 68. What's wrong with * you*? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Thu Jul-01-10 03:19 PM Response to Reply #68 |
| 70. Fascinating how many 'crash and burns' we have in this thread. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dogtown
|
Fri Jul-02-10 07:05 AM Response to Reply #70 |
| 76. Seriously! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Thu Jul-01-10 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 71. A tempest in a t-shirt. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Junkdrawer
|
Thu Jul-01-10 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 73. Here's his accuser: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 18th 2013, 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC