Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Same toxic chemicals that poisoned Exxon Valdez clean-up workers now used in the Gulf!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 04:12 PM
Original message
Same toxic chemicals that poisoned Exxon Valdez clean-up workers now used in the Gulf!
Same toxic chemicals that poisoned Exxon Valdez clean-up workers now used in the Gulf!

The LA Times reported in November 2001:

There are others whom almost no one talks about, although unlike the birds, most of them are still alive. They are the people who scraped oil off the beaches, skimmed it off the top of the water, hosed it off rocks.* Workers who stood in the brown foam 18 hours a day, who came back to their sleeping barges with oil matted in their hair, ate sandwiches speckled with oil, steered boats through a brown hydrocarbon haze that looked like the smog from hell.

After that summer, some found oil traces in their lungs, in their blood cells, in the fatty tissue of their buttocks. They got treated for headaches, nausea, chemical burns and breathing problems, and went home. But some never got well.

Steve Cruikshank of Wasilla, Alaska, has headaches that go on for days. Two years ago, he was hospitalized when his lungs nearly stopped working. "The doctor said, 'I'm going to give you the strongest antibiotic known to man, and you're either going to survive or not survive. I don't know what's wrong with you.' What's wrong is, I haven't felt right since that oil spill."

The citizen website "http://valdezlink.com" explains that 2-Butoxyethanol apparently played a major role 1989 in Alaska.


A factsheet (PDF) about this substance explains:


EFFECTS OF SHORT-TERM EXPOSURE:
The substance irritates the eyes, the skin, and the respiratory tract
Exposure could cause central nervous system depression and liver and kidney damage.

EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM OR REPEATED EXPOSURE:
The liquid defats the skin.
The substance may have effects on the haematopoietic system, resulting in blood disorders.



BP is currently using Corexit 9500 and 9527 in unprecedently large quantities in the Gulf of Mexico.

MUCH MORE info (and video) HERE:

http://palingates.blogspot.com/2010/06/bribes-behind-drill-baby-drill-exposed.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Merchant Marine Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. If I was working on one of those boats in the gulf
I'd be ashore right now. No amount of pay is worth eating, drinking and breathing those chemicals. Every ship out there that is running its watermakers is sucking up incredible amounts of toxins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not if you had a family to feed.
If you could get a job with BP you'd be out there in the muck and the crap so you could pay the mortgage and the light bill and put food on your family (as a recent awlman CEO of these Uninna States once said).
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merchant Marine Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's why I'm staying single until I'm done with sailing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. We're using the same 'technology' we used 30 years ago.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yes, we are.
No govt. funding for research and development under Bush, and the Corporate world saw no need for R&D due to deregulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Please, por favor, bitte... Check out this link in PV
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x477788

Drew Wheelan is throwing down the gauntlet. Let's do support him.

SOMEBODY MAKE THEM STOP USING DISPERSANTS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC