|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
BradBlog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:55 PM Original message |
BREAKING: SC DEM PARTY EXEC BOARD UPHOLDS NOMINATION OF ALVIN GREENE FOR U.S. SENATE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prisoner_Number_Six (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. If this doesn't wake the pols up to BBV NOTHING will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Pardon, BBV? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. black box voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Tks. One bright thing about ALL of this; some folks are having their eyes opened., now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prisoner_Number_Six (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Thanks. I shoulda posted that link myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. WRONG This is Republicans crossing parties in a primary to MoFo the Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shrek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I doubt the Republicans crossed over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Kerry VonErich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 04:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
61. It was attempted in Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prisoner_Number_Six (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. My point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
28. You have NO evidence of that, and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 12:20 PM Response to Reply #28 |
51. So, where are YOUR FACTS that e-voting failed in this SC race? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #51 |
60. Reliable audit trails would answer that question, wouldn't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burnsei sensei (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
32. I just don't understand how SC Democrats could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. If I lived in South Carolina I would vote for the spaced out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Oh, hell yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
4. Congratulations on winning a worthless nomination! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. Despite no evidence presented that the results were accurate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 09:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. Did anyone present any evidence that the results were inaccurate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Yes. They did. Read my live blog coverage (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
heliarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-19-10 01:18 AM Response to Reply #23 |
65. Ever look at Five Thirty Eight.com? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-19-10 12:31 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. The absentee thing has a plausible explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
30. That's correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. The burden of proof is on those claiming election fraud... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 01:15 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. You didn't watch & don't seem to understand elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 07:22 AM Response to Reply #40 |
47. And yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 01:34 PM Response to Reply #40 |
55. No, they had to determine if there was any evidence that the results were not true and accurate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 01:27 AM Response to Reply #30 |
41. ZERO evidence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #30 |
52. The vote results prove Alvin Greee won the election. Geeeeze!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
heliarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-19-10 01:21 AM Response to Reply #52 |
66. Consider that the total vote count... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugabear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-19-10 01:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
69. Do you believe that Bush won in both 2000 and in 2004? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
7. Why would they do that? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. where in the hell was the national party on this issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burnsei sensei (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
33. Good question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 07:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
48. I'm sure that they will come in and overrule the state party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. This makes no sense whatsoever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. They didn't take that into consideration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 09:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. They have an electronic track that records every move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. You're uninformed...again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. There have been reasonable explanations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 02:01 PM Response to Reply #34 |
58. K&R. Very sad that the party was afraid to address electronic voting issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Yes, someone is up to something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Have you ever heard Sarah Palin speak? She isn't any better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. But Palin is "hot." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Eyre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
18. I'm not surprised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 09:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. That is the point, is it not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. You didn't watch the protest hearing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:30 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. He got more votes than ballots cast. Isn't that prima facie of error/fraud? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
19. Well, like Mark Levin said, DeMint is the luckiest politician in the country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. Alvin Greene would be a better senator than DeMint. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. My thought exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevepol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
24. This is just a joke, in the same way that our election system is a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:52 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. Well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Eyre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 04:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. No paper trail = no evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevepol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 05:13 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. I appreciate your thoughts but just a few points in response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Eyre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 05:58 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. I agree with you, but there is still no evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #45 |
56. They cannot know "that the election was manipulated through the machines." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
go west young man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
38. I blame the democratic Party as a whole for this fuck up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Eyre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 04:44 AM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Absolutely! You get it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevepol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
64. I don't believe being first on the ballot is much of an explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jotsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
42. What a revolting development! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
49. Lee Mercer demands a recount. All three! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brother Buzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 01:57 PM Response to Reply #49 |
57. Oh my, the road scholar from the United States Navy/United States Marine Corp at West Point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 02:03 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. ahhhhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 05:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
62. Come to think of it, have you ever seen Greene and Mercer in the same place at the same time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
50. Thanks Brad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. wouldn't it be something if Greene would win by some fluke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. It sure did work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devil_Fish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-18-10 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
63. Brad, I am with you on this, but the same thing happened with Bush in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-19-10 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
67. F***ING vote-riggers!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugabear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-19-10 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
68. Congratulations. They just handed the Repukes the November elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-20-10 01:06 AM Response to Original message |
71. When was the last time a Dem was a US Senator in SC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC