Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The (D)evolution of the Republican Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Suji to Seoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 07:26 PM
Original message
The (D)evolution of the Republican Party
This will be short. Let's look only at the (d)evolution of the Republican Party, namely in their Presidental Candidates since 1950.

1952 - 1956: Eisenhower. Was moderately progressive, pacificistic, humanitarian. . .bad race relations. A decent president for the time. Out of 10, he would be about a 6, but would be drummed out of the Party quickly if he were alive today. Reasonably asute man. The number of accomplishments under him are numerous, but the most important was the appointment of Earl Warren

1960; 1968; 1972: Nixon: Even Eisenhower hated him. . .had his good point or two at this point of his career. Knew the political game and if TV were not invented, he would have become president as he destroyed Kennedy on substance, but Kennedy won on style. 4 out of 10. Reasonably asute man, even when he was a complete corrupt with poer asshat that resigned. Reopened communication with the PRC.

1964: Goldwater: "Extremism in the Defense of Liberty is not Vice." Sums up this sub-human mouth breather. Got wise to what his movement became at the end of his life, but in 1964, was about as low and conservative as could get without nomimating Francisco Franco. 1 out of 10.

1976: Ford: Ugh. . .only good things was nomiating John Paul Stevens. 2 out of 10.

1980; 1984: Saint Ronald of Ray-gun: And now we start out decline into devolution rapidly. 1 out of 10. Major accomplishment: 1986 tax cuts that have my tax accountant father a full time job (but that's only because of self-interest), Over 200 people were fired, resigned, arrested, indicted or convicted of breaking the law or violating the ethics code. His AG was investigated four time.

1988; 1992: Bush the Senior: Major accomplishment. Got alot of Kurds and Iraqis slaughtered when he pulled out of Iraq and left them high and dry. 1 out of 10.

1996: Dole: Sacrifical lamb. "plain and honest" bullcrap artist. 1 out of 10.

2000; 2004: Bush the Lesser: Just when you think you can't get anything worse than the last three, the GOP surprises you. Bankrupted the country, embarrassed the people and has more blood on his hands than any one President in history. -10 out of 10.

2008: McCain: Can't we forget him already. -5 out of 10.

Looking at the field, here are the five major GOP candidates for 2012, from most appealing (if that is possible) to vomit enducing:

Paul: A stopped clock is correct twice a day.
Mittens: The stereotypical political flag.
Huckabee: Courage of convictions, even if those convictions will doom America.
Gingrich: Time is waiting for his next death-bed divorce
Gigot: Proof the GOP truly markets itself to the lowest common denominator.

After view this gaggle of losers, I will make prediction for 2016's candidates.

Insane wino on the corner
Lump of dog shit
Dead driftwood
Potted Fern
Speed Bump
Dan Quayle (which is really all five wrapped in one)

The American EX-Pat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm, for me, it's a toss-up between Quayle and the lump of dog shit.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gigot? You mean, Gidget?
I prefer, The Twit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Driftwood / Stick -16
GOT WOOD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. So you REALLY think Palin's their choice?
She's got the potted fern down pat. As for speed bumps, give her any complex policy question, sprinkle facts and issues on top, stir slowly, making sure not to overheat it, and see if the lump of dog shit doesn't make her all the more edible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. I really can't disagree
with much of that.

There is no question that Eisenhower was the best Republican president of the previous century. He recognized the inherent danger in the military industrial complex. As if to illustrate his point perfectly, that same military industrial complex, and its far reaching influence, has ruined our nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzclinton05 Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Say It Isn't So!
I hear that rush limbaugh will leave the country if the health care bill passed. Now that it has passed, I wonder if canada will welcome him with open arms? I doubt it but if he agrees that pushing political violence is right, then sooner or later he's gonna wish he was a democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC