Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top Earners Paid only 16.6% Federal Income Tax:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:11 PM
Original message
Top Earners Paid only 16.6% Federal Income Tax:
Edited on Tue Feb-23-10 02:23 PM by amborin


Top-Earning U.S. Households Averaged $345 Million in ’07

By BLOOMBERG NEWS

February 17, 2010

The 400 highest-earning households in the United States averaged nearly $345 million in 2007, up 31 percent from a year earlier, data from the Internal Revenue Service shows.

The figures for 2007, the last year of an economic expansion, show that average income reported by the top 400 earners more than doubled from $131.1 million in 2001. That year, Congress adopted tax cuts proposed by George W. Bush. Democrats say those cuts disproportionately benefit the wealthy.

Each of the top 400 earning households paid an average tax rate of 16.6 percent, the lowest since the I.R.S. began tracking the data in 1992, the statistics show. Their average effective tax rate was about half the 29.4 percent in 1993, the first year of the Clinton administration, when taxes were increased.

snip

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/18/business/economy/18irs.html?scp=9&sq=wealthy%20income%20tax&st=cse





A Bizarre Year for the Estate Tax Will Require Extra Planning

January 8, 2010

Most tax advisers thought that Congress would extend the estate tax before it was due to expire at the end of last year. But while the House did act, the Senate did not. So what few predicted would happen did happen: the tax is gone for one year but set to be revived in 2011 at a higher rate and a lower exemption, unless Congress acts.

It’s the first time since 1916 that rich Americans can contemplate dying without one last tax

snip

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/your-money/estate-planning/09wealth.html






More Tax Chores for the Wealthy at Year-End

snip

The biggest question — the one that overshadows all of the others and is still unresolved — is what will happen to the estate tax next year. While the House of Representatives has voted to make permanent the current 45 percent tax rate on all estates above $3.5 million, the Senate has yet to take up the bill. And it is not clear if it will have time to do so this year.

The uncertainty gives wealthy investors much to consider in the next few weeks. To address these concerns, I intend to discuss here what you should do before the end of the year and use the next column to look at what you should do at the beginning of 2010.

snip

SHORT-TERM TRUST For the wealthy, this was the year of the GRAT, for grantor retained annuity trust. Sam Petrucci, a director in the wealth planning group at Credit Suisse Private Bank, said he arranged more of these trusts this year than at any time in the previous decade.

GRATs are a fairly simple way to transfer money to an heir tax-free. A person puts a sum in the trust that will be paid back to him over a fixed period of time. The heir receives any appreciation in the trust above a “hurdle rate” — the interest the Internal Revenue Service requires to be paid to the person who set up the trust.

The reasons for the increased attention in these trusts were twofold: the hurdle rates were low all year, as were the prices of some securities. Mr. Petrucci said that someone who put $10 million into a two-year GRAT with the December hurdle rate of 3.2 percent, assuming an 8 percent return, would pay himself two payments of roughly $5.2 million and pass $760,000 to heirs free of gift tax.

snip

HOUSING ISSUES Two property-related benefits also need to be considered. The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act was scheduled to expire at the end of the year, but it has been extended until 2012. Normally, a person has to pay ordinary income tax on the part of a mortgage the bank forgives. Under this law, up to $2 million will continue to be forgiven tax-free on a person’s primary residence.

The second issue is conservation easements. The wealthy use these to give part of their property to a local conservancy and get a tax break. Mr. Doyle said this is probably the last year that people can deduct an easement worth up to 50 percent of their adjusted gross income.

snip

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/your-money/estate-planning/12wealth.html?_r=1&fta=y



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's about what I paid
And I'm not a top earner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who would have thought the rich would get richer (at our expense)
under the horrible Bush years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are laughing at the Little People all the way to the bank.
They know we are SUCH gullible fools. They just keep telling us lies, and we keep swallowing them whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kicked and recommended..
Thanks for the thread, amborin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. and don't forget folks ...
that's based on the KNOWN earnings ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush declared class war on America.
and it's time to send Republican policies to gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. No Way.
I heard on the radio that the wealthy pay their fair share. And if they have to pay any more, there won't be any money left to hire us to clean their toilets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Earners" should not be the term... implies they all actually EARN their money.
Despite what John Houseman might have said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFpPovznSG8

Yes, some work hard for the money, many others just cash the checks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. K$R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC