Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Still Wants Excise Tax on Middle Class for HCR:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:09 PM
Original message
Obama Still Wants Excise Tax on Middle Class for HCR:
Edited on Wed Feb-17-10 12:09 PM by amborin


An agreement to tax high-cost, employer-sponsored health insurance plans, announced with fanfare by the White House and labor unions last month, is losing support from labor leaders, who say the proposal is too high a price to pay for the limited health care package they expect to emerge from Congress.

Senator Kent Conrad and Speaker Nancy Pelosi see the tax's prospects as doubtful.


But the White House is still urging Congress to adopt the excise tax as a way to help pay for President Obama’s ambitious health care proposals.

With support for the tax eroding, Congressional leaders are searching for alternative sources of revenue.

snip

When the tax agreement was announced on Jan. 14, White House officials described it as a breakthrough that would help clear the way for passage of sweeping health legislation.

Besides producing a substantial amount of revenue, they said, the excise tax on the most expensive insurance plans would slow the growth of health costs by giving consumers a powerful incentive to shop for cheaper policies.

snip

A wide range of House Democrats continue to criticize the tax as bad policy, even with the changes negotiated by labor leaders and the White House.

Moreover, House Democrats said, the tax is bad politics because it would set the middle class against the poor — people struggling to keep health insurance against people struggling to get it.

snip

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/health/policy/16health.html?scp=1&sq=obama%20excise%20tax%20health%20care&st=cse

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. BRILLIANT, I tell ya!
Instead of us fighting Big Insurance together, let's make the lower class fight the middle class. A win-win for Wellpoint!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benchwarmer Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. It won't happen
You know I think that the Obama administration made a big mistake trying to pander to the right and apease their nervous blue-dog friends. Obama keeps extending an olive branch, but all they are doing is using it as fire wood.

Depending on the results of the midterm elections, he may have missed his chance to pass real progressive reform.

In regards to healthcare, I really wish they'd push the public option. I honestly think we need some kind of benchmark health care ("the basics") in order to compare costs and value of different plans. The current healthcare system (broken as it is) can offer supplemental packages on top of that base for anyone who needs or wants it. I don't see how doing this is "socialist" or even anti-capitalist. It provides the most coverage to the most people.

I am one of the people that would likely get hit with the above described excise tax. I don't really care and honestly I think businesses will do everything in their power to avoid it. It just makes sense. To be competitive they have to offer a competive benefits package. So in my mind either they will absorb the costs or they will increase pay while reducing health benefits. They need one incentive to keep their workforce. It will frankly be harder for the cadilac healthcare offering businesses to sell their plan as an incentive to workers if "everyone" has healthcare to offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gee, I thought HCR was supposed to be paid for by repealing Bush's tax
cuts for the rich. Haven't heard much about that since, oh, say, Nov 5, 2008. I wonder why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. This line is infuriating:
"When the tax agreement was announced on Jan. 14, White House officials described it as a breakthrough that would help clear the way for passage of sweeping health legislation."

Seems they thought they would get a little Republican support if they put a little union busting in the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would not be surprised to find most think they would pay the tax, not the insurance co's.
I acknowledge the economists view that says the insurance co's would eventually find a way to past the cost onto consumers; however, given the piss-poor job WH/Congressional Communications did of getting out in front of GOP frames on the issue, I would not be surprised to find that most don't realize they're railing against the insurance companies having to pay the tax. Even the headline of this OP is misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It wasn't the GOP frame ...
It was the unions' frame. If we hadn't had that (misleading) fight, HCR would have been passed before the end of the year, and we wouldn't be in this predicament now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Take your point. Was referencing Scott Brown. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Right, just like most think that retailers pay sales taxes.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Where'd you get that idea. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. No eventually about it. It will be passed on and it will be the end of comprehensive policies
Everyone will wind up with the crap that is becoming standard today. In no employer sponsored medical plan did I ever have a policy with more that a $500 deductible and less coverage than 80%. This was standard in the industry until just a few short years ago. We, actually, were able to see our doctors and have recommended procedures in those days. Now, this is considered 'gold plated.' It's part of the race to the bottom. Hand over millions of new customers who will have to pay whatever to get the minimum the industry can get by with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. What's in the Essential Benefits Package?
The very thing you're talking about. That would be considered the minimum again -- not gold-plated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. 65% coverage with deductibles of $2000 and out of pocket of $5-10,000
Indefensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. No. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's a horrible policy. WTF is wrong with Obama.

The House version - the millionaire tax - was perfect (at least in that one aspect). Obama could've easily pushed for it, especially since he campaigned on it. Darn, this is so disappointing. How can he look people in the eyes. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm not surprised the libs don't get it.
You're not supposed to be paying the excise tax.

You're supposed to be moving from overpriced plans to cheaper plans that don't pay the tax. It's a cost control measure.

But it's a bit too complicated for some libs to grasp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. We get it. We don't want to move to lower priced plans with higher out of pocket costs
It's the same crap as Bush's 'ownership society,' which postulated that if people had to spend more of their own money, they wouldn't 'buy' as much health care. Not complicated at all. It's rationing that leaves the rationing in the hands of patients who won't be able to afford to use their policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. "libs"? that says it all.
you're pretty obvious. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. It certainly does tell the story. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. What is it that we "libs" don't get?
The Max Tax is a squeeze play that will force less comprehensive plans and the goal is quality affordable health care for everyone.

What I don't grasp is the desire to force folks to pay for crappy coverage they won't be able to afford to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. We could find $300 billion for HCR if we would allow Medicare to do what every other country does:
negotiate lower prices for drugs. But, noooo, we have to protect the deal with Billy Tauzin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. Please correct me if I'm wrong,
...but didn't Obama "campaign on" paying for Health Care by raising taxes on the top 2%?
Seems like I remember that but I could be wrong.
I thought I remembered him campaigning on a Public Option "like Medicare" available to anyone who wanted to choose it, by clearly I misremembered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I remember that. Perhaps it was mass hallucination? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
igfoth Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. This is what we will get for HCR
a tax increase for all Americans with the money that is collected being given direct to insurance companies along with Tort Reform, Obama has not gifted the Pubs enough.

With each passing day I regret more and more that I voted for him in the first place but once Kucinich was out, our choice was old Pub with a lunatic VP or Obama.

Guess I should have wrote someone in so I would at least feel good about my vote.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
26. Class warfare at its finest. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC