Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Health Care Reform NOW ( by Administrative Decree)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:56 PM
Original message
Health Care Reform NOW ( by Administrative Decree)
We all remember “legislation by administrative decree”, right? That is what the Bush-Cheney used to do when they wanted to roll back environmental protections or make torture legal. They did not leave it up to Congress to write the law and the federal courts to interpret the law. They did it all themselves.

The Obama administration recently revealed that it also believes in the power of the executive branch to create the law. I refer to the case in which a federal judge ordered spousal benefits for lesbians. Rather than appealing the ruling the Obama DOJ made its own ruling. It said that the judge was wrong. Period.

Since Obama believes in the expanded powers of the executive branch which Bush-Cheney promoted, I think it is time for him to put those powers to good use.

He can start by enacting health care reform by administrative decree.

I. Expand Medicare to Cover All the Nation’s Chronically Ill

Some of those folks out there with brittle diabetes and unstable angina can not wait until 2014 for health care. Turns out, they do not have to.

There is a bill in Congress that would phase out the two year waiting period that applies to everyone with a medical disability (except end stage renal disease on dialysis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis aka Lou Gherig’s disease). The bill is H.R. 1708. There is a companion bill in the Senate. The health insurers should love this one, since they will be able to punt all the sick people straight to Medicare. However, there is a loophole in the law which Obama could use to actually provide care to needy people (and not just increase the profit margins of health insurers.)

The bills would extend the exception to all "life-threatening conditions." These are not delineated in the bills, but defined as conditions that are "fatal without medical treatment." The Secretary of Health and Humans Services would be responsible for compiling a list of such conditions, with regular updates. To compile the list, the Secretary would be required to consult with various federal health agencies and to annually review the SSA "compassionate allowances" list.


http://www.nosscr.org/medicarewait.html

Get that? If Kathleen Sebelius says that your diseased coronary arteries are a “life-threatening condition” because you could die from a heart attack tomorrow without medical treatment, then CAD joins ALS and ESD as a Medicare waiting period free condition. COPD, asthma, autoimmune diseases like lupus and all forms of cancer are fatal without proper treatment. Even gallstones could qualify, since the gallbladder could become gangrenous or cause a fatal case of pancreatitis.

So, let’s see the administration lobby for this bill and then use it to provide affordable, comprehensive care to everyone in desperate need of care. Think of all the lives that can be saved before 2014 even gets here.

II. Increase the Number of Federally Funded Community Health Centers

Right now there are 1200 Federally Funded Community Health Centers which treated approximately 7 million uninsured Americans in 2008. Now, this might seem like a drop in the bucket compared to the 40 plus million Americans without insurance, but every little bit helps.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-04-09-freeclinics_N.htm

For those Americans who do not have a “life-threatening” disease, centers like this can make preventive care affordable. That is because these clinics charge a sliding scale fee for their services.

These clinics are authorized by the Public Health Service Act, linked here:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/42/254b.html

For purposes of this section, the term “health center” means an entity that serves a population that is medically underserved, or a special medically underserved population comprised of migratory and seasonal agricultural workers, the homeless, and residents of public housing, by providing, either through the staff and supporting resources of the center or through contracts or cooperative arrangements—
(A) required primary health services (as defined in subsection (b)(1) of this section); and
(B) as may be appropriate for particular centers, additional health services (as defined in subsection (b)(2) of this section) necessary for the adequate support of the primary health services required under subparagraph (A);
for all residents of the area served by the center (hereafter referred to in this section as the “catchment area”).


The list of services provided is impressive. Be sure to read the above link. Cancer screening, immunizations, family planning services are all included.

Note that grants are available for new clinics at the discretion of the federal government (i.e. Sebelius). I suggest that the federal government increase the capacity of these clinics (and start up some new ones) in order to provide preventive and necessary medical services to folks without insurance who are too broke to pay cash.

III. Spend More of the Stimulus Money on Health Care

As I pointed out in my journal “Books, Not Bombs: How Military Spending Hurts the Economy and Education Spending Helps”

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/McCamy%20Taylor/440

Education spending gives the best return on your investment if you want to create jobs. Tax breaks and military spending are the worst. Health care and infrastructure are also pretty good at jump starting an economy plagued by unemployment---

And if you use your funds to provide necessary health care services in a time of high uninsured rates (which go hand in hand with high unemployment) you are getting double rewards for your money.

HHS has already jumped on this one with grants such as this:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today announced the release of $120 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds for prevention and wellness programs for U.S. states and territories, building on the recent announcement of the $373 million funding opportunity for communities and tribes around the country. In all, the comprehensive Communities Putting Prevention to Work initiative will make $650 million available for public health efforts to address obesity, increase physical activity, improve nutrition, and decrease smoking.


http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2009pres/09/20090929d.html

We need more spending like this. Maybe the administration can move around some Pentagon funding “by executive decree.”

IV. Make It Easier (and Safer)For Americans to Order their Drugs From Canada

I was just amazed when I compared the prices of drugs in Canada to the prices in the U.S. Some are four times more expensive here. Some do not have a generic available in this country, but they do in other countries, which saves even more money.

I was also surprised to read that it is absolutely legal for people here to order drugs from Canada, as long they only get 90 days supply at a time and as long as they have a prescription. You can read more about the federal legislation at wiki’s “On Line Pharmacy” page here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_pharmacy

Note that Customs still has the right to intercept your medication (though they rarely do so). This may discourage some people from making use of this opportunity to save money. I suggest that the Obama administration stop all seizures of medications from Canada—at all levels, federal, state and local. Just declare it protected, legal international commerce.

V. Start Prosecuting Insurance Companies for Price Fixing and Other Anti-Trust Violations ASAP

There is a problem with this one. Right now, the insurance industry is exempt from anti-trust laws. So, they are able to merge into single behemoths that completely control a wide geographic area. A bill in Congress, introduced by Leahy, would strip the industry of this protection. It is languishing (of course) because insurers hate the legislation. However, if the federal government can force us to buy private insurance, it must have a way to keep the insurers from price gouging---especially since the new “National Insurance Plans” will be exempt from state and local regulation which have been used to check the industry’s greed up until now.

We need to call upon Congress to pass the bill---and Obama to become active in his support of the bill. The insurance industry will not be able to claim (as they so often do) that this law will raise rates. This law can only lower rates and keep them at a reasonable level. It will cut down the amount the feds pay out for premium support, too, which will lower taxes. Without an economic justification to quash the bill, the insurance industry will have to kill it in stealth. Do not let them.

Here is info about HR 3596, The Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3596/show

Passing the bill will be only half (of) the (uphill) battle. Obama’s DOJ will have to enforce the law. They will be reluctant to do so---just look at how aggressively they have prosecuted the banksters. However, since voters will feel the effects almost immediately through reductions in their health care premiums, it will be worth it, politically speaking. Would not it be great to have a choice of insurance carriers again? Would not you feel safer if you knew that you were buying security for your family from a company that did not take your business for granted?

If anyone knows of any other ways that the administration can get a head start on health care reform, please post them. Obama is not powerless. Congress does not control everything. Plenty of stuff gets done in this country through executive agencies. Obama and Sebelius should move heaven and earth to serve the voters---that is the best way to ensure that Obama is not a one term president. When the system has let you down, you want a president who is willing to buck the system.

Here is the one I wish we would see (but probably won't):

VI. Obama Declares War on Preventable Disease. Demands that Congress act fast to authorize special wartime powers for the executive branch

We had a war on poverty once. Why not a war on needless death and suffering?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tnlurker Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. The House and Senate are working on it. Plus there are other issues out there besides health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I could list the excuses for NOT doing I, II, III, IV, V, and VI, but they're irrelevant because
the Democratic leadership will supply them for us soon enough--if any of them actually have the audacity to admit that your ideas have merit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. You Want Obama to DO Something? Something Good for People?
:rofl:

Which planet are you from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratefultobelib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hateful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Merely Observant
You may ignore reality if you wish, but nobody else is required to feed your fantasy life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, I do. For his own sake as well as ours. Unless he wants to be a one term loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. I suggested something similar earlier.
But not in such great detail. And simpler which probably means I am not as well informed.
But I suggested that he just decree by executive order that anyone could buy into Medicare regardless of age.
And I think that would be better because it would allow the low risk people to come into the pool and reduce the cost to all.
but this idea is less likely to happen than yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. We hated it when Bush governed by executive order.
We should be equally unhappy when any other President does it. It's not OK to govern by edict ust because the result might be "progressive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. frankly, I wouldn't mind a "benevolent dictator" in this time when total morons & greedy people
are making decisions that so hugely affect my life.

The problem with "majority rule" is that the majority are usually total idiots who think only of their own wallets and little else--they have no foresight, they can't see further ahead than their next bank statement, let alone long-range consequences of their actions and decisions. They are also gullible, easily fooled by "loaded" words like "socialism" into "voting" against their own best interests and well-being. The "majority" have given us Ronald Reagan, GWB, and a bunch of other scumbags, leading to virtual destruction of the country.

But rule by idiots and charlatans is too well entrenched--even the most ignorant must have a "say"--this works so well for the exploiters and greed-heads, the carnival-barker televangelist politicians who know how to push buttons to further their own miserable ends.

I think a few WISE, unselfish "edicts" by a good-hearted president would help get us out of the quagmire of political bullshit that is strangling and bankrupting the country, but it ain't gonna happen, so no need to get alarmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Amen...
I do find it ironic that there are those who are upset with this President cause he's not the Anti-boooosh. That it was a travesty when the previous regime ramrodded things such as the Patriot Act and the IWR through Congress, and think this administration should use the same tools to achieve their dreams. This President, who came from the legislative, has respected the separation of powers and now appears to be paying the price for it.

The problem is a dsyfunctional legislative that is corrupted by money and egos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Great thread! Keeping their feet to the fire should be out
top priority. It appears from my limited knowledge that all of this is possible, and, certainly, all seem to be good government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. This would be immediately challened in court and brought to the USSC
where (at very best), they would rule 5-4 against. Executive orders are contentious but issuing an executive order that reorganizes 1/6 of the American economy and affects every single person would not go over well. Not even if it was a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. We were against Shrub using this, and we called him an evil idiot for it. What's our excuse? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Consistency is all I ask. If we are to praise all of Obama's actions
(as so many do) including his use of expanded executive powers to keep gays in their place, then we should demand that he use those executive powers to keep his campaign promises, too. Anyone who thinks that the DOJ did the right thing in the lesbian spousal support case, has no excuse for not demanding that he go just as far in the service of health care as he is willing to go in the service of homophobia.

For all of those who objected to the administration's actions in the case cited above on the grounds that the executive branch may not usurp the judicial branch powers, then certainly you want Obama to follow the letter of the law re: HCR, too. In this thread I show some of the ways that he can push HCR forward legally

What concerns me are those who claim 1) he can do whatever he wants to gays and 2) he is powerless when it comes to HCR. Which is it? You can not have it both ways. Either praise him for using expanded powers--and demand that he use them to keep HCR promises. Or, insist that he is powerless to accelerate HCR in this country---and call him a law breaker for the DOJ's actions in the spousal support case.

If Obama supporters are not consistent, then we must assume that they believe not in the law, but rather in Obama's ability to do no wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Well said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. You make a good case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC