Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jane Hamsher, Rahm Emmanuel & Grover Norquist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:25 PM
Original message
Poll question: Jane Hamsher, Rahm Emmanuel & Grover Norquist
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 08:26 PM by Junkdrawer
Background here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=417139&mesg_id=417139

Since this is not a natural Yes/No poll, I'll post a range of options:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jane? Is that you? (and you've brought your palsies with you?) nt
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 08:27 PM by Sarah Ibarruri
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Seems like a fair range of options to me, but I guess that Rahm's defenders...
would be unhappy with any poll other than a range of horrible deaths for Jane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Oh so it is you, Jane! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I don't have a boyfriend named Grover Norquist. My name isn't Jane. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Again, I do not accept $ from Repukes like Ralphie, nor do I worship at the ass of
Grover Norquist like Janie.

Stop accusing me of either of those behaviors. Blame your own leaders, Ralphie and Janie of being Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Jane, to the Firebaggers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Project, much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. She's the one who set her flying monkeys on the blogosphere
to support her stupidity.

I'm just waiting for somebody to dump a bucket of water on her, but it;s more likely Norquist will drown her in the bathtub, and her little firebaggers, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeaBagsAreForCups Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go Jane, you're a true progressive...
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 08:31 PM by TeaBagsAreForCups
... it's well past time for the day to throw Rahm off the boat; he's proven to be little more than our own Captain Queeg.

If this "investigation" moves us closer to that day, so much the better.

Then, just then, maybe we might start to enjoy all of that true and actual progressive "hope and change" promised to us by the President during his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There is no real reason for all this acrimony.
Do you want health care reform or not? Lots of attention seekers out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeaBagsAreForCups Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. "Do you want health care reform or not?..."
... the operative term being "reform."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other
I support the demand for transparency but I'm very puzzled by the decision to ally with Norquist.

I will say that this whole episode has made me curious to learn more about Grover Norquist, though. I wonder how many conservatives are expressing essentially the same concerns about his alliance with a progressive, pro-big-government liberal blogger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Michelle Malkin can't stand that he partners with liberal groups. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I have had the same thoughts. Rahm is obviously pro-corporate...
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 08:46 PM by Junkdrawer
so why would Norquist agree to take him down? Then I remembered that we have an oligopoly, not a dictatorship, so there are a range of competing interests at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Walk into a bar..
Ok, so how does the rest of the joke go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. The bartender says "We don't serve weasles here"....
And Jane says "It's OK, they're with me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. #3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Grover the unfriendly monster and Rahm the angry dwarf should share a prison cell
since they are both treasonous swine, both guilty of the same thing. Enabling corporatist fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think we should partner with people on the right when we the cause is good.
For example I think we can definitely enlist tea-party types to oppose WTO and some of the evil trade agreements that are costing us jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Other: Nobody cares. What the fuck is wrong with you people? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. Other: when I see a red hot poker being thrust at Rahm's ass, I don't give a shit who is wielding it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. *snort*
Really, love your response and it made me snort. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeaBagsAreForCups Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Touche' !
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. Other:
I don't know enough about Hamsher to take a solid position.

I dislike Rahm Emmanuel as much as I do Grover Norquist.

Anything legitimate that clips Emmanuel's wings is fine with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. ... walked into a bar
(only way to save this one.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
27. Wow this is a pretty strong indictment of rahm.
Good. The guy is useless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I did a poll the other day and 86% think Rahm needs to go....
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 09:20 PM by Junkdrawer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Yup, less than 100 DUers
call the AG right now.


:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. He has 13% support. That is George Bush type numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
31. rahm is a neo- republican! ..no wait.... he`s a neo- liberal!
he`s everything to everyone!

someone cue-up Cream`s "Politician"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
34. Why aren't we discussing the fact that Rahm is up to his eyeballs in
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 11:06 PM by juno jones
improprieties with Freddie and Fannie and whatever, Jane and Grover are WWC, they are Jerry Springer, they are Brangelina.

What a fucking distraction.

If there is evidence Rahm did us wrong, abused his post and betrayed the people, then all means it should be looked at. We have DO a transparent damn governmment and all, right everybody? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC