Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Neocons Must Be Pissed; China and Russia Are Getting the Sweet Oil Deals in Iraq" by Pepe Escobar

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 06:21 AM
Original message
"Neocons Must Be Pissed; China and Russia Are Getting the Sweet Oil Deals in Iraq" by Pepe Escobar
"BEIJING - Former United States vice president Dick Cheney, ex-defense minister Donald Rumsfeld and assorted US neo-cons will have plenty of time to nurse their apoplexy. One of their key reasons to unleash the war on Iraq in 2003 was to seize control of its precious oilfields and thus shape a great deal of the new great game in Eurasia - the energy front - by restricting the access of Europe and Asia to Iraq's staggering 115 billion barrels of proven oil reserves.

"After at least US$2 trillion spent by Washington and arguably more than a million dead Iraqis, it has come to this: a pipe dream definitely buried this past weekend in Baghdad with round two of bids to exploit a number of vast and immensely profitable oil fields."

http://www.alternet.org/world/144639/neocons_must_be_pissed%3B_china_and_russia_are_getting_the_sweet_oil_deals_in_iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wonder if the neocons set it up this way on purpose
so as to set up the next set of enemies for their program of perpetual war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bingo
They've been repeating that pattern for decades now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. I thought the cos. they represented were primarily concerned w/ monopolizing the transport
of the oil, so that whoever owned it would have to pay them and be dependent on their favor. It's been a while, but the last I read was that they did get that contract w/ Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC