Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hospitals, Insurers Oppose Health Bill Compromise On Medicare Buy-In

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:01 PM
Original message
Hospitals, Insurers Oppose Health Bill Compromise On Medicare Buy-In
Edited on Thu Dec-10-09 11:03 PM by TomCADem
Source: Kaiser Health News

Groups representing doctors and hospitals are coming out against the inclusion of a Medicare "buy-in" in the Senate health bill, The Washington Post reports. The groups joined Republicans in arguing "that a plan by liberal Democrats to allow uninsured individuals as young as 55 to buy into Medicare would be financially untenable and would jeopardize access to health-care services for millions of Americans."

The organizations, including the American Hospital Association, the Federation of American Hospitals and the American Medical Association, said the proposal would hurt their members because Medicare pays providers at a lower rate than private insurers. "Hospital representatives said the idea also would violate a deal they reached with the White House this year to give up $155 billion in Medicare payments over the next decade. The concession helped to lower the cost of a health-care package that promised hospitals a pool of at least 30 million newly insured customers" (Murray and Montgomery, 12/10).

USA Today: "Though the idea gained traction on Capitol Hill — and got a boost from President Obama — the outcry from the medical groups underscored the difficulty lawmakers are facing as they look for compromises that can win broad support for the Senate's bill, which would cost $848 billion in the first 10 years. 'Bringing more people into a system that doesn't work very well is not a good answer,' said Jeffrey Korsmo, executive director of the Mayo Clinic Health Policy Center. 'The current Medicare program is not sustainable'" (Fritze, 12/10).

The New York Times: "The American Hospital Association issued an action alert on Tuesday urging its members to oppose the plan and to call their senators’ offices. ... The Federation of American Hospitals also issued a bulletin ... 'Any Medicare Buy-In would invariably lead to crowd out of the private health insurance market, placing more people into Medicare,' the group said. 'It is critical that you contact your Democratic Senators today!'" (Pear and Herszenhorn, 12/9).



Read more: http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Daily-Reports/2009/December/10/Industry-Reax-To-Senate-Health-Deal.aspx



Shoot. Can you imagine if Medicare for all was on the table?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
the blues Donating Member (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Horrors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. And what are we going to do about it?
What can we do? Hell if I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. This isn't LBN. It's a self-serving press release from Kaiser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Different organization
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/FAQ.aspx

Is there a relationship between KHN and Kaiser Permanente?

Neither KHN nor Kaiser Family Foundation is affiliated in any way with the health insurance company Kaiser Permanente.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. NY Times Has The Same Story - "Hospitals Oppose Early Medicare Access"
Even if it is self-serving, it is self-serving in that they are attacking the expansion of Medicare:

http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/09/hospitals-oppose-early-medicare-access/



Hospital groups are mobilizing against a proposal under consideration by Senate Democrats to let some people ages 55 to 64 buy insurance coverage through Medicare beginning in 2011.

Hospitals, doctors and other health care providers often complain that Medicare payment rates are insufficient to cover their expenses.

The proposal is part of a tentative deal that Democrats have sent for a cost analysis by the Congressional Budget Office.

Liberals are seeking the Medicare buy-in provision in exchange for agreeing not to push for a new government-run insurance plan, or public option, to compete with private insurers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Hospitals Oppose Early Medicare Access"
Edited on Thu Dec-10-09 11:53 PM by AlbertCat
A hospital! What is it?!

It's a big building with patients (that opposes early medicare access) but that's not important now.










Don't they mean the people who OWN hospitals oppose early medicare access?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. No, everyone in the hospital including all patients and all their families
... also the bricks and mortar, the drugs themselves are on the fence but the families of crows that call the rooftops home are all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-10-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. This action by the FAH seems like a conflict of interest.....
Doctors jobs are to provide medical treatment, and this medicare for all gives doctors that privilege, but the docs are asked to oppose it? Big Bad Move....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Soooo it must be a good idea for the common person n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. If the Insurers are against it, then that's what I want! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. So what exactly happened over these last several months regarding health care?
oh that's right, THEY ALL CAVED.

Now we are trying to get a bone thrown to us and even that will be dipped in shit.

Weeeee!!! Our government loves us!!!

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC