Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Target shift: Feds focus on employers of illegal workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:44 PM
Original message
Target shift: Feds focus on employers of illegal workers
Edited on Fri Dec-04-09 12:47 PM by SpartanDem
Now this how you're supposed do it, making employers pay up for their hiring practices.



As an attorney advising southeast Michigan businesses, Aimee Guthat has worked with hundreds of companies that hire foreign workers in industries ranging from agriculture to information technology.

This year, with a new U.S. president has also come a new way of ensuring a legal work force at those businesses.

"With the Bush administration, the focus was really on enforcement with respect to the actual foreign nationals," says Guthat, a lawyer with the Troy office of the international Fragomen law firm. "Now the focus is on looking at employers and focusing the enforcement actions on companies to make sure they're compliant and abiding by the law."

In other words the federal government is moving away from the highly publicized raids of worksites that result in roundups of workers and toward investigating and penalizing employers who benefit from undocumented workers.


http://metrotimes.com/news/story.asp?id=14607
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. About time. There should also be a mechanism that would allow
businesses to ask for permission to hire if they cannot get enough workers for the jobs. This last is important because if no one harvests the beets the price of sugar is going to skyrocket. We need to see that they are not allowed to hire illegals but we also need to see that the crops are harvested and the work is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. NO. There should be no such 'mechanism"
Let the market work...If they can not attract enough workers...THEN RAISE THE PAY UNTIL THEY CAN !! Free market, right????Let crops find a "real" price. That's free enterprise!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. McCain said Americans won't work in the field for $50 and hour
I'd like to see him proven wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I have a problem with starving. Do you eat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. False Dilemma
I have a problem with the idea that for our system to work there has to be several million people being systemically mistreated.


We already subsidize agriculture to keep prices up. We could spend that same money to subsidize agriculture to keep prices down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. .
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. The market will find the wage.
Will prices go up? Yup! But they are artificially kept down with very poor wages for farm workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. thye have to go after the 3rd parties.
in my career with EDS (28 years), I went from seeing a complete in house American house keeping team into a contracted, non English speaking team.

Don't just go after the contractors that hire these illegals, go after the companies that hire the contractors that provide the people they exploit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well duh!
There would be no illegal employees if there were no illegal employers. It's not rocket science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. If there were no illegal employers there would be no illegal employees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why can't it be both?
Why don't we penalize people who hire illegal immigrants, while deporting the immigrants, controlling the borders, and expanding pathways for legal immigration?

Controlling the border will limit narco/human traffickers from coming in and money and guns from Mexico.
To deincentivize Mexicans from illegally immigrating we can offer more legal immigration and punish illegal immigration. A system where legal immigration is a process that requires living in Mexico to complete will keep people from immigrating illegally. Make anyone caught living in America without proper immigration status permanently disqualified from legally immigrating or even visiting America.
Push hard enough so hiring undocumented immigrants becomes a unusable business model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It should be both
but I think you get more bang for the buck focusing on employers controlling for peoples incentive to come in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. It is about the total package
Pushing one idea too hard will quickly get diminishing returns. You don't need to do one thing really hard, but a bunch of easy things. You can't pick up something heavy from one edge no matter how hard you try.


How long would undocumented workers stay when they watch the wave of legal immigrants taking their jobs?

Prosecute the employers.
Deport those living here.
Increase legal immigration.
Increase border security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC