Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Agencies can honor existing ACORN contracts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:31 PM
Original message
Agencies can honor existing ACORN contracts

Agencies can honor existing ACORN contracts


The Justice Department has instructed federal agencies to honor contracts with ACORN that were signed before Congress banned the community advocacy organization from receiving any further government funding earlier this year.

In an opinion issued in late October and released on Friday, the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel determined that lawmakers were unclear on whether agencies should terminate pre-existing contracts with ACORN, which stands for Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

In September, Congress passed a spending bill that includes a provision banning any new federal funds from going to ACORN. President Obama signed the bill on Oct. 1. ACORN responded by filing a lawsuit with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in early November, arguing the provision is an unconstitutional "bill of attainder" that singles out one organization for punishment.

The fiscal 2010 Continuing Appropriations Resolution states, "None of the funds made available by this joint resolution or any prior act may be provided to , or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or allied organizations."

http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44139&dcn=todaysnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Freepers freak out for the government still obeying the Constitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. hang on. Acorn has not even been accused of any wrongdoing officially, has
it? Don't they need to be at least indicted before you can cut funding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Are they cutting funding for Black and Tn, Backwater or Halliburton?
They all have been convicted of major felonies and frauds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC