|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
BobRossi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:05 PM Original message |
2%, boy that was worth the fight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why don't they just open it up to anyone who wants it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. That would cut into their constituents' profits, I'm afraid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 01:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Well stated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-02-09 10:06 AM Response to Reply #21 |
39. because obama sucks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nightrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. knr. yep, dump it and start over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. No, "choice" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillE (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. How is it "Choice" when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProleNoMore (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hate To Say It - That Sure Is Change We Can Believe In |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
5. How many humans does that 2% equal? And arent they the ones w/o any coverage? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobRossi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. One in three under 65 without health insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nightrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. 6 million, in the yahoo article.. yes, mostly those w/o. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
7. "a haven for patients with health insurance horror stories" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. But if it isn't opened up to people without "health insurance horror stories" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 07:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. I'm thinking this is more akin to the insurance pools for drivers that no company wants to touch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comrade snarky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. The Public Option under discussion has always been limited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
10. That's, what, about five million people? N.T. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. The CBO estimated the 2%. Who knows how they arrived at that number. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's starts small, but it starts..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. But if the only people eligible are otherwise uninsurable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. It will not be just the uninsurables....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 01:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Good point. Happy to hear that your rates will likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-02-09 01:27 AM Response to Reply #16 |
37. Social Security in 1936 stunk to high heaven |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. "IT" is more money to health insurance and Big Pharm" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cry baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. +1...it will save lives and hopefully grow into something bigger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 09:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
32. Right. Just like Social Security started with a requirement that everyone have a stock market |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
14. "insurers fear that Congress could change the rules later, opening it up to all people" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. But It's Not The Magic Pony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 07:22 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Ahhh, an "according to some" post. What is your purpose with a post like this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 07:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Sorry...I Don't Play That Game... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 07:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. If you mention pony you are playing "that game". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 08:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Nice Try... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 10:21 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. I suggest you re-read your signature. Peace back. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
optimator (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
26. lets make our own nonprofit insurance org |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
30. "Public" "option" is a ruse, designed to be a distraction ("shiny object") for the public. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
34. 900 BILLION Dollars for a 2% Public Option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-01-09 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
35. the bones are getting much smaller now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PHIMG (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-02-09 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
36. We've been had folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-02-09 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
38. Change I don't believe in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC