|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 06:58 PM Original message |
White House Claims Executive Privilege Over RNC Emails |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's not gonna fly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It better not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. You should be right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. OK, now we know the RNC accounts were used for more than campaigning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Executive Privilege attempt = GUILTY!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. used for illegal communications form the white house.., obstruction of justice by circumventing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Servers for RNC are in Tennessee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-18-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. then they are Toast.. interstate violations are severe, the integration of the cafe by Blacks in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. The only thing they can be hoping is to run the clock out in the courts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. Actually they used a VERY INTERESTING phrase other than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Gonzales probably created the term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. "executive branch interest" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Conyers should say that Congress supercedes Executive Branch interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. ''Chimpeachment'' is another one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ioo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
7. We must be on the right track... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
8. CREW SENDS NEW FOIA TO WHITE HOUSE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION OF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. Astounding, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
14. Having it both ways; exhibit one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
18. Check Mate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-17-07 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
21. If they had anything to do with WH business, they should not have been... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave123williams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-18-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
22. Oh, sorry ; you can't have it both ways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-18-07 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
23. This is the kind of nonsense we can expect since the Justice Dept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-18-07 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
24. That's complete bullshit...RNC has nothing to do with exec. privilege...that's like saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-18-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
25. Prima facie evidence that a crime has been committed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-18-07 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
27. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC