Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Accounting Firm Admits Cost Savings Left Out Of Report Prepared For AHIP Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:22 AM
Original message
Accounting Firm Admits Cost Savings Left Out Of Report Prepared For AHIP Report
So why should we believe anything they say?

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/accounting-firm-admits-cost-savings-left-out-of-report-prepared-for-ahip-report.php?ref=fpb

Accounting Firm Admits Cost Savings Left Out Of Report Prepared For AHIP Report
Christina Bellantoni | October 13, 2009, 10:12AM


Accounting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers has issued a statement about the audit it performed for America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) that we have been following closely.

Most notable about the statement, issued late last night, is an acknowledgment the cost savings from the bill weren't included, though PWC points out that is noted on page one of the report.

Here's the statement in full:

America's Health Insurance Plans engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers to prepare a report that focused on four components of the Senate Finance Committee proposal:
*Insurance market reforms and consumer protections that would raise health insurance premiums for individuals and families if the reforms are not coupled with an effective coverage requirement.

*An excise tax on employer-sponsored high value health plans.
*Cuts in payment rates in public programs that could increase cost shifting to private sector businesses and consumers.
*New taxes on health sector entities.

The analysis concluded that collectively the four provisions would raise premiums for private health insurance coverage. As the report itself acknowledges, other provisions that are part of health reform proposals were not included in the PwC analysis. The report stated on page 1:

"The reform packages under consideration have other provisions that we have not included in this analysis. We have not estimated the impact of the new subsidies on the net insurance cost to households. Also, if other provisions in health care reform are successful in lowering costs over the long term, those improvements would offset some of the impacts we have estimated."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. They were hired to do a report that was not comprehensive by design. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder why these Accounting Firms are even still in business
Every single one of them has a Tax scandal where they were defrauding the IRS and every single one of them has a mass grave of former clients who went belly-up overnight with the auditors scratching their ass.

I seriously question the public good of any of the services they provide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. For fugg sake - PricewaterhouseCoopers?
They make the Fundie snake oil salesmen look honest.
Check their history and name one occasion when they sided with the decent among humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, their history is shaky at best...they were involved in
trying to keep cigarettes tax-free iirc.

It's all about who pays them the most to spew the lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. They also have a horrible, almost Ponzi scheme like employment structure
"Associates" are encouraged to work upwards of 80 hour weeks in hopes they will one day be able to become a wealthy partner (of course few do.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. ...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. And another...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC