Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calif. top justice slams state referendum process

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:31 PM
Original message
Calif. top justice slams state referendum process


Calif. top justice slams state referendum process

Saturday, October 10, 2009


(10-10) 15:05 PDT Sacramento, Calif. (AP) --

The chief justice of the California Supreme Court criticized the state's reliance on the referendum process Saturday, saying it has "rendered our state government dysfunctional."

The widespread use of referendums to change state laws and constitutions hampers legislators, gives special interests too much power and burdens the judicial branch, Chief Justice Ronald M. George said in a speech delivered in Cambridge, Mass.

"The court over which I preside frequently is called upon to resolve legal challenges to voter initiatives," George said. "Needless to say, we incur the displeasure of the voting public when, in the course of performing our constitutional duties as judges, we are compelled to invalidate such a measure."

The justice's comments were released early but officials with George later confirmed he followed the prepared remarks in delivering the speech.

George said the ballot box system places California's lawmakers in a "fiscal straitjacket" that prevents them from effectively solving the state's financial crisis. The result, George said, is growing debt.

"These constraints upon elected officials — when combined with a lack of political will on the part of some to curb spending and on the part of others to raise taxes — often make a third alternative, borrowing, the most attractive option at least until the bankers say 'no,'" George said.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/10/10/national/a111817D68.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0TaQpWWXU


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is one of the problems... in governance in this state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Living in Ca I agree, but.....
I also know that if the PTB could rid themselves of the referendums the resulting authority the legislature gained is likely to be used against the middle and lower classes in raising taxes.

Theres a reason Prop 13 was voted into law, they did it before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Proposition 13 should probably be modified to remove the 2/3rds requirement for taxes.
Delete the requirement in the proposition that requires a 2/3rds majority to raise any tax rate. Once that part of the proposition has been repealed, the tax rates in the state could be redistributed up the income ladder. Lots of millionaires in California. A progressive tax code could then be more easily enacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. good nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. He is absolutely correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC