Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIT debt proposal could hit US Treasury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:17 AM
Original message
CIT debt proposal could hit US Treasury
The US Treasury could take a sizeable loss on its $2.3bn investment in CIT Group, the US commercial lender, if it and the company’s bondholders approve a debt restructuring proposed this week.

The embattled lender, which focuses on small and mid-size businesses, has offered its bondholders a debt exchange that would reduce the company’s $30bn debt load and grant bondholders preferred stock amounting to between 92 and 94 per cent of its equity.

The restructuring also relies on the US Treasury to agree to convert into common equity its $2.3bn of preferred stock in CIT, issued in December as part of the troubled asset relief programme. After the conversion, the Treasury and other preferred stock holders would be left with between 3.5 and 5 per cent of the company. Such a move would result in a “substantial hit” to the Treasury’s investment in CIT, according to people close to the situation. These people said the Treasury’s position remains fluid but that the government is aware of the company’s difficulties. The Treasury did not return calls seeking comment.

If the company does not win the necessary concessions from at least two-thirds of its bondholders, CIT will automatically apply for pre-packaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for its holding company, according to the proposal. Under this scenario, the Treasury’s investment in CIT would be wiped out.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1d7d61e0-afa2-11de-ba1c-00144feabdc0.html

You have to wonder if taking that $2.3bn and making all the payments due for a couple of months would have worked out better for both the businesses that relied on these loans as well as the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cut our losses
From now on any of these banks need more money let the fuckers fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. How about that
hand them $2.3bn and they still can't make end meet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC