Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Review urges Walter Reed closure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 07:48 PM
Original message
Review urges Walter Reed closure
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usreed155172474apr15,0,3156203.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-print

Review urges Walter Reed closure
THE WASHINGTON POST

April 15, 2007
WASHINGTON - A top-level review panel appointed by the Pentagon has concluded that Walter Reed Army Medical Center should be closed as soon as possible, following revelations of poor care that the panel blamed on a "perfect storm" of failed leadership, flawed policies and overwhelming casualties.

In a preliminary report released last week, the panel recommended accelerating the closure of the hospital in northwest Washington. Under decisions made two years ago, the hospital's facilities already were due to move to the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., by 2011.

A faster move could mean speeding up or waiving an environmental review and releasing money to break ground on a $2-billion expansion plan at Bethesda, according to the draft report from the Independent Review Group. Construction of a larger Army hospital at Fort Belvoir in northern Virginia also should be expedited, the report said.

The Navy is preparing a draft environmental study for the Bethesda plan, which would include a large addition on the north side of the hospital building and tower. "It needs to be built, and it needs to be built as quickly as possible," said review panel member John Schwarz, a physician and former Republican congressman from Michigan. "The environmental impact study should be waived."

Such a move could inflame neighbors of the sprawling campus, who are counting on an environmental review to assess the effects of added traffic. And it would run counter to efforts in Congress to stave off Walter Reed's closure.

Even as they urged a speedy shutdown, members of the Pentagon group called for the immediate investment of hundreds of millions of dollars at Walter Reed for short-term infrastructure improvements and to address shortages of nurses and other medical personnel.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, NOT a good idea. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. WRAMC = prime real estate
just sitting there waiting to be developed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I fear that's what it truly is all about. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Prime DC real estate





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. It should have been closed a while ago, but Reps and Senators want it

near them for their use. Would hate for them to have to go all the way to an Army facility in Baltimore or heaven forbid go to a private doctor and wait in a room with mere mortals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC