Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Voting Machine Monopoly Threatens Elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 10:11 AM
Original message
Voting Machine Monopoly Threatens Elections
Voting Machine Monopoly Threatens Elections
The Sale Of Diebold's Election Business Has Alarmed Civic Watchdogs

by Eliza Newlin Carney

Monday, Sept. 21, 2009

To some election law experts, dire warnings by vocal activists that faulty voting machines are threatening democracy tend to ring false.

After all, questionable machines are only one of the many problems plaguing an election system that's outmoded, decentralized and chronically underfunded. The best machines in the world won't help if local election officials can't hire and train enough poll workers and clean up their error-riddled voter registration lists.

But an industry shakeup that's placed one controversial vendor in charge of more than half the nation's voting technology has thrust the debate over machines squarely back into focus.

The sale earlier this month of Diebold Inc.'s election business to Election Systems and Software has alarmed election officials and civic watchdogs, and prompted calls on Capitol Hill for the Justice Department to intervene. A smaller, competing voting machines manufacturer has also filed suit.

more:
http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/rulesofthegame.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. If we were to outlaw election observers, there would be uproar, yet that's what happened with secret
vote counting machines and total impossibility for electronics to be secure and reliable. Testing one minute will not predict or assure what the machine will do during an election, either by error or fraud. We bought crappy machines in 2002 and since, which still does not take away that we haven't the time, interest and money to process every single vote. Give us back our mechanical and easy to observe machines that election boards can manage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. we never managed to clean up this electronic voting mess up either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-21-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Democratic leadership thinks the concern over electronic voting machines with NO
paper trail is a distraction.

They will do nothing about this threat to our democracy.

Rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC