|
means "professional discretion."
That means we are professionals, and we decide what fits our classroom, and what does not.
If you are unaware of this, since the inception of NCLB, we are held accountable for making sure that every activity we do directly relates to a state content standard.
The speech will fit what we'd be doing anyway, in many cases. The first days or weeks of school are spent establishing expectations and procedures, and teaching students how to be successful. The speech fits there.
I open with a unit on civics. The speech will be a good fit there, at some point in the next week or two.
Secondary math teachers may not find a way to justify that speech, where social studies teachers can.
Kindergarten teachers, especially those who are charged with teaching babies a full academic curriculum in half of a day, may not find the speech a good fit.
For the rest, it depends on what their units of study to begin the year are, what kind of time they are given to "cover" them (budget cuts pared my district down to 147 instructional days this year,) and how productive they think it will be to make the time.
Professional discretion.
BTW, not showing the speech in the classroom is not "censorship." It will be available to anyone who wants to see it, 24/7, from any computer, at least for awhile.
I think it's a great speech. I also know that the WH doesn't dictate how I spend my time in the classroom. That speech isn't a mandate; it's an opportunity. Districts, school sites, and teachers, have a choice.
|