|
Several years ago, I worked for a bank. At the time I was hired, the bank hired a manager two or three levels up from the level of my group. (I worked as a programmer in a division of data processing.)
The first six months on the job, this banker cost the company at least a quarter of a million dollars through bad decision making. He went way over budget. Did the executives decide that they had made a bad choice in hiring him? Of course not.
This banker merely cancelled several projects begun as much as two years before by his predecessor and got rid of several programmers. (Some of the programmers were contractors. Staff programmers were transferred to other groups.) This caused an immediate drop in payroll, so his area of responsibility developed an immediate savings. Realistically, his killing the projects meant that all the money spent on them went down the drain. Total loss to the bank must have been at least three quarters of a million, maybe more.
How did the bank deal with him. If you guessed that management threw a party for him, and announced bonuses and a promotion for him for saving the bank lots of money, you would be correct.
If news got out that the bank had hired such a bumbling idiot, investors might decide to get rid of this bank's stock. Employees in our division knew the facts. Who would risk their jobs telling the world what had happened?
This is one example of how private industry ensures that the public believes that the private sector does a better job than the government. The private sector doesn't. It merely has better means of covering up its mistakes. The myth that, if a company can show a profit on its books, then it is doing things well, brings to mind a company called Enron.
I worked for corporations, hospitals, and academia and saw the same waste and fraud almost everywhere. The only difference is that nongovernmental groups can more easily hide it.
|