Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House rejects calls for national catastrophic (hurricane) insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 07:15 AM
Original message
White House rejects calls for national catastrophic (hurricane) insurance
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/nation/17062744.htm

White House rejects calls for national catastrophic insurance
By Lesley Clark
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON - The White House on Wednesday emphatically rejected calls for national catastrophe insurance as Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and the state's senators implored Congress for federal help to cap the spiraling cost of hurricane insurance.

Crist, a Republican and the lead witness at a Senate Banking Committee hearing that looked at ways to address rising insurance costs, said he and other Southern governors backed a national fund to spread the risk for recovering from catastrophic natural disasters across the country, "thus strengthening our insurance markets."

"Traditional insurance-market mechanisms are not adequately managing catastrophic risk, and the financial strain on customers can be felt from coast to coast," Crist said, noting that Hurricane Katrina showed widespread vulnerabilities.

Various factions of the insurance industry oppose a government-run plan, and one of President Bush's top economic advisers told lawmakers that the administration also is against it.

Echoing some congressional critics, Edward Lazear, the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, said a federal program would unfairly penalize taxpayers in areas that weren't prone to disasters and could lead to more development in hurricane-prone areas because homeowners wouldn't "bear the full expected costs of damages occurred."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC