panader0
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 09:52 AM
Original message |
| Ensign busted to semen first class |
 |
After the revelation of his parents paying off the woman and her husband, I can see nothing political in his future. Step down asshole.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Them desert Republicans sure are a tawdry bunch, ain't they? |
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
 |
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 10:07 AM by MercutioATC
.
|
Curtland1015
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Too many one liners in brain... |
 |
overloading... OVERLOA *Brain asplodes*
|
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. Did someone say brain??? Hungry? |
KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. It's Downright Embarassing... |
 |
A 50 year old man running to mom & dad to bail him out of trouble? Yeah, this one will wash. But then if you're a rushpublican, all you have to do is "admit" you've sinned (while still trying to cover up the sorrid details), blame the Clenis and you're absolved.
There's still a lot of stink to air from this fiasco...and let's see if there's any criminal investigation into abuse of campaign finance laws that could land Johnny boy in the big house for 5 years.
|
lunatica
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Makes ya wonder how many times they've bailed him out before |
 |
I would say many many times, just like George Bush has always gotten bailed out.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
| 8. Very punny. But first class semen? |
 |
BTW why do republicans have to pay for sex?
|
panader0
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jul-10-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. $96,000.00!! Wow! that musta been some great sex. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Nov 22nd 2009, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |