Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The American Tragedy of John McCain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:00 AM
Original message
The American Tragedy of John McCain
Link: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040607J.shtml

The American Tragedy of John McCain
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Columnist

Friday 06 April 2007

Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the Shadow

- T. S. Eliot


Arizona Sen. John McCain took a walk through a Baghdad market on April Fool's Day, and may well have burned his presidential campaign down to the ground in the process. That little stroll has visited upon his head a deluge of humiliation and shame vast and astonishing enough to beggar imagination, and that was before the bodies started hitting the ground.

Translated into mathematical terms, McCain's walk was Pythagorean in scope, squared hypocrisy added to squared idiocy equaling squared disgrace. In political terms, McCain's Baghdad walk was a full-blown, bull-moose, train-wreck disaster of truly galactic proportions: a veritable Hindenberg of campaign photo-op debacles. It was so mind-bendingly ugly and deranged and disgusting that the once-iconic "Dukakis in the Tank" blunder now seems quaint by comparison.

The genesis of this catastrophe, in case you missed it, was a verbal gaffe by McCain during a widely broadcast interview last week. After enduring several minutes of sharp interrogation regarding his staunch support of Bush, the war and the "surge," a neuron within his logic circuits apparently misfired. He claimed, with an entirely straight face, that the streets of Baghdad are today entirely safe for an American to walk down. This whopper made even the most shamelessly craven war apologists shake their heads in public, and forced McCain to undertake a desperate face-saving lunge to recover some shred of credibility.

McCain traveled to Baghdad to prove his claim correct, and the pictures appeared shortly thereafter. In the first available frames, the senator was shown walking through a Baghdad marketplace wearing a Kevlar vest, a general on his right and a troop on his left, and a second troop three steps ahead brandishing his rifle. While this kind of protection detail seemed to undermine his claims of safety, the escort and the vest could easily be understood as normal and necessary precautions taken to protect a visiting dignitary. For a time, McCain appeared to have made his point.

It didn't last. On the heels of those narrow-scope photos came reports of what McCain's entourage was actually comprised of. That "safe" Baghdad market had been flooded with more than one hundred battle-ready troops and armored Humvees. Three Blackhawk helicopters and two Apache attack helicopters roared overhead, and sharpshooters were posted on the surrounding rooftops. Simply put, McCain's "safe" street was one overly loud mouse-fart away from being paved with flaming lead during every step of that little walk.

To compound the calamity, a report emerged two days later describing the abduction and slaughter of 21 Iraqis who worked in the marketplace McCain's mini-Normandy force had stormed the previous Sunday, an obvious act of retribution for his visit by a violent Baghdad militia. Already belied by the revealed firepower he brought along, McCain's "safe" walk in Iraq led directly to yet another horrific Baghdad bloodbath. There is bad, there is awful, and then there is this thing, this quantum singularity of ignominy that bends the very light now shining upon it.

Call it farce, call it folly, condemn it for its drenching hypocrisy and the mortal consequences suffered by 21 innocent people. One must also see this, in the end, as a true American tragedy of historic proportions.

Once upon a time, John McCain was a man who commanded and deserved great respect. Beyond the awe-inspiring courage and strength that marked his Vietnam service was the integrity he displayed, for the most part, in his political life. While his conservative views did not jibe with many, there was something about his conduct in office, his independence of thought within the rigid confines of his party, that made Americans stand up and take notice. Even the scandals involving him, most notably the embarrassing Keating Five debacle, did not permanently tarnish his image.

This was the man, recall, who came within an eyelash of derailing the George W. Bush Express during the 2000 race, thrashing the Texas governor by 16 points in the New Hampshire primary. A great many people who knew even then that Bush wasn't up for the job he sought breathed a huge sigh of relief after that, because even in disagreement, they saw in McCain a man of honor whose politics did not matter as much as the apparent content of his character.

The roots of this tragedy can be found in the events which took place in the days following the 2000 New Hampshire primary, when all eyes turned to the contest in South Carolina. Bush had all the GOP money and endorsements, but McCain had suddenly made a hash of that seemingly foregone anointment. What followed stands as one of the ugliest chapters in modern American political history.

Bush's people deployed a whisper campaign against McCain, mostly within the Christian Evangelical community of South Carolina, that labeled the senator "the fag candidate," smeared his wife Cindy as a drug addict, claimed their adopted Bangladeshi daughter was actually black and the issue of an illicit and interracial liaison, questioned whether his sanity had survived his POW experience, and even went so far as to accuse him of collaborating with the communists in Vietnam to ease his time in that prison. Bush wound up winning the primary by 11 points, and the McCain campaign never recovered.

McCain's simmering rage over what happened in South Carolina was manifestly evident; for many political moons thereafter, the senator could not be compelled even at gunpoint to speak a kind word about either Bush or the Evangelical shock-troops who had propelled that slander-fest against him and his wife. Bush, for his part, treated McCain like a puff adder at all times, avoiding even the possibility of a venomous counterstrike from his furious former opponent by keeping him at a distance.

And then, something happened. It started slowly, with McCain appearing to set aside his anger to defend Bush as the 2004 presidential contest approached. McCain became a Bush campaign staple, and worse, was the respected face and voice who came to defend the administration whenever they made another incredible mess. It was McCain, perhaps more than any other political figure, who helped Bush hold on to the centrists long enough to make it through that second election. The senator's reputation and good word, for many, were enough to convince folks to wait and see.

Over the last year or so, that reputation and good word have fallen to dust. John McCain has expended vast energies trying to staple himself to every Evangelical Christian leader with clout in the Republican Party. He has become the most unabashed supporter of the Iraq war, of each failed and foolish policy put forth in the occupation, a process that culminated in the horrorshow at that Baghdad marketplace on April Fool's Day. He now wears the blinders needed to believe there is hope in Iraq, and there are 21 new bodies in a marketplace over there to prove it.

McCain has embraced George W. Bush, literally and figuratively, as some sort of long-lost brother. In doing this, he betrayed not only the individualism that once defined him, but gave the American people a demonstration of how insipid politics without principle can truly be. The very people who so viciously attacked McCain and his family in 2000 are now, apparently, his best friends in the world. One wonders if the senator avoids facing himself in the mirror nowadays because he does not want to see the whore's face in the reflection.

Even those who disagree with his politics must admit, with hard-won hindsight, that McCain circa 2000 would have been far preferable to George W. Bush. If more Republicans in our government today were like McCain was then, we would all be in a far better place. That distinction has been erased, and John McCain has become just another GOP lickspittle who toes the bloody line and refuses to admit, despite all evidence, that his new best friends have failed us all. This is, simply put, a tragedy for him.

It is our American tragedy, as well, because McCain became this sad fraud out of absolute necessity. One cannot hope to gain the GOP nomination for president without winning over that party's hard-right absolutist Evangelical Christian base, and the opinions almost universally espoused by that base are a lot of the reason this nation is in such dire straits. Our tragedy is found in their power over any national Republican candidate, and over the administration currently running the republic into the ground.

John McCain's reputation is destroyed. He has become one of T.S. Eliot's hollow men, bereft by his own actions of the formidable image that once defined him, and is now just another cheaply-bought candidate peddling himself for pennies on the dollar to the very wretches who once savaged his character and family. He is gone, just completely gone.

Another poet, Yeats, once described a world where the best lack all conviction, and the worst are filled with passionate intensity. McCain has become the essence of that listless best and striving worst, and the transformation is a lesson for us all about just how much selfdom must be sacrificed upon the altar of GOP politics to win an election. McCain has proven himself unfit to be president, and perhaps worse, he has shown us all how cheaply integrity dies when power is close at hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only in your enigmatic style, Will
can one find the phrase "mouse-fart" and a quote by Yeats in the same op-ed.

Nice work. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great article, Will!!
Some nice turns of phrase: "quantum singularity of ignominy." LOVE IT!!

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Read it this morning on Truthout. It makes me worry about what is happening to the
character of a large percentage of Americans. So many seem willing to lie, cheat, and sell their souls for the almighty dollar. I'm talking about non politicians, just the folks trying to live in their gated suburb and raise their kids. And then, there's this 'new' line from the fundamentalist churches... God wants you to have an over-abundance.

I'm old enough to remember when 'character' counted above all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. I think Bush represents well the dark side of the American psyche.
Where greed, dishonesty, arrogance reign supreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. The scary thing is that he may be an embraceable reflection of the Party.
No integrity required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Hollow Men is always a good metaphor. The line from TMBG,

"You can't shake hands with the devil and then say you're only kidding", seems very apropos for McCain as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. An amazingly concise summary ...
... of what truly is an American Tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Is it the level of tragedy?
We put a lot of stock in the avatars of the "heroic male", the straight shooter, the macho integrity glamor and never so much as in trying to puzzle out the humanity of the GOP "elect". Sometime liberal leaning people go so far as to follow the RW fans of such non-entities as the Bushes, such Nixonian thugs as Buchanan, falling for the Hollywood image of Reagan. Looking for someone to respect in all the wrong places. As with royalty(crooks with crowns), power or celebrity, it is only after they have risen to some form of dominance that people suddenly beneath these rising stars look for the light that must be there- somewhere.

How far did McCain have to go after that birthday hug-fest, that endorsement of the Forever Oil War? Has he finally gone so far as to cast light back upon poor judgment(not his but OURS) where so many scandals and RW agendas planted Dead End Ahead road signs that only the blind could miss?

The judgment finally is "that's it, he's really done it this time", a political suicide that fittingly uses the deaths of a couple dozen Iraqis behind a personal shield of many American soldiers put needlessly at risk. The final obscenity is not tragic, just one more in a long line of morally repulsive acts signalling desperation for personal gain.

I say this to move on to Hagel. His equally ambitious nature plants those same road signs with his hands blistered from burning American votes so he himself could get elected and then all the other vermin. This hero who brings up some counter to the Bush who will never back him yet backs away from real confrontation for fear of being hurt. A person who will mention impeachment as obliquely as he calls for a change of course in the Forever Oil War with no hint whatsoever of implementing the former or ending the latter.

Call me a prejudiced misogynist when it comes to the current tribe of GOP officials racing their dune buggies into the desert of their own making. I cast a jaundiced eye on our own party, but there I see actual signs of hope worth admiration and support. What makes this prejudice far and away more rational than McCain fandom or Hagel cheering sections is the fact that somehow, in the spirit of perverse illogic, a hypocritical tough appearing GOP male, is given a big pass directly juxtaposed to more rationally critical dismissal of ALL Democrats. So much so that somehow, like cattle sensing a poisoned water hole, they all begin stampeding away from deserving Dems toward the fraud.

I would never grant such idiocy even a glimmer of such favor, much less grant them credibility as possible leaders of the people. I have seen this kind of betrayal far too many times to feel sad awe at the common event of seeing another "new Nixon" self-combust with corruption. It only tells me many want to be tricked, fooled, gulled, and subservient to an image so demonstrably false as to stagger the imagination. And then, in the fortunate meltdown(fortunate not in being inevitable because it always is, but in timeliness), to grant one last remaining spark of sentiment for the feeling of trust only big phony can inspire. And yet how completely we can turn away from a Gore or Kerry when their very worst failings involved how they were duped or victimized themselves by that same lie factory. And no one calls that tragedy because they are ours and we are too intimately involved to be appreciative spectators of theatrical politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So what you're saying in your thoughtful post, Patrick, is that
there's something about the way the GOP candidates are presented or cast that allows them to look like tough manly "mavericks" or heroes, no matter how little courage or accomplishment is actually evident, at the expense of Democrats, who tend to be regarded as a bunch of ineffectual nancies (the "mommy party") by the public? Maybe this has to do with the traditional realms of both parties--the GOP tends to look stronger in foreign policy, defense, small government (though Chimpy has blown all three), while the Dems are traditionally seen as the "Domestic Gods/Goddesses" of social programs, protecting fringe groups, expanded government. Maybe we Dems do this to ourselves. Maybe we should start co-opting the traditional GOP issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. "who tend to be regarded as a bunch of "WHAT??" by the public?"
Edited on Fri Apr-06-07 01:21 PM by Amonester
What public? The 30% brain-dead-washed public who believe every fear campaign they happen to see on six-corporations-owned M$M teevee 24/7?

Maybe the 70% "skeptical" (these days) and the 50% of them totally disgusted by what the BFEE has done to their country would like to have - at the very least - one chance to try a different kind of governement than what they've been kind of "waterboarded" with since the JFK assassination: a government by the people, for the people... a government that cares about them and their daily "needs" (environment, food, education, employement, etc.).

Love all "nancies" as much as the 70% of US... And f*** the 30% warmongering lemmings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. We accept the permission of the MSM
as if that is neutral ground and give in to the talking points that rule there IF we can find some semblance of common ground, some humanity, some salvific dialog that would end the phoniness and divisions that unfortunately are essential in the nature of this ground. And we wonder that the Congressional reps schmooze and compromise too much! It happens all the time among white males even when gazing admiringly from afar, trained by sports stars and war movies to create legends and myths on a media assembly line. That same cultural warp then passes again to the clubbish politicians who admire colleagues who appear as monsters except in that media glow they feel their voters, too, universally accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. What in God's name are you talking about?
"The traditional realms of both parties...protecting fringe groups...expanded government... :puke:

Which "fringe group" do you think the Democrats protect? Could your imaginary fringe groups be any worse than the so-called "right to lifers" who bomb womens health clinics or federal buildings, or mail anthrax to the opposition party & journalists? Talk about fringe, did you even see the Terri Schiavo debacle? :grr:

You don't like government, don't want to pay your taxes? Well get the fuck off of my roads, don't call the police or fire department when you have a problem, and don't complain when your children are diagnosed with diseases caused by environmental pollution or unsafe food.

Traditional gop values are nothing more than robbing the poor to give to the rich. Because someone appears to be tough because they are a murderer, bully, thug, and a thief doesn't mean that they should be in charge of any government (you can go to a number of underdeveloped nations to find that, and there you will usually find a thuggish dictator that we installed), it just means that they are well connected criminals who need to be kept away from humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Done Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wow... Deja Vu
I just came from Smirking Chimp where this is also posted.. Nice one Will...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Spot on Mr. Pitt , once again.
K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. McCain lost every last shred of my respect in 2000.
McCain`s service during the Vietnam War aside, I can think of no single statement or deed that merits my respect.

McCain, engineer of the Straight Talk Express, has apparently concluded that he has risen so far up the Republican food chain that he can now adoringly and willingly adopt the party`s sickening, WIN AT ALL COSTS standard. If 100 American soldiers have to be ordered into harm`s way in order for McCain to have a headline-grabbing photo op, so be it.

The only thing left for McCain to do is grab his ankles and tell us once again how well AWOL`s invasion is going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. McCain Got what he Deserved
He's more a comic figure by my reckoning.
He's getting what he deserves.
The real tragedy is 3260+ American Servicemen
buried all across our country for lies he is
helping to keep alive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent piece Mr. Pitt
Yeah, truly sad. I considered voting for him in 2000 and was literally stunned when the GOP chose George Bush's idiot spawn instead. With 20/20 hindsight now I realize we may actually have been worse off if that's even conceivably possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Wonderfully done, Will.
McCain is truly an iconic example worthy of classical mythology.

In this case, the mighty have not fallen; he has crawled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyLoochka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not sure I agree with this

"Even those who disagree with his politics must admit, with hard-won hindsight, that McCain circa 2000 would have been far preferable to George W. Bush."

McCain in 2000 was the neocons' first preference. Willy Kristol etal campaigned hard for him - why? I think it was because Kristol and cronies thought little bush would more closely adhere to his father's "realism," but he KNEW the neocons already had the allegiance of McCain.

I'm pretty convinced John McCain would have "pre-emtively" invaded Iraq had he been elected. The difference in admins would have been primarily in whether or not Cheney had any position of power in a McCain admin. I don't think McCain is much more intellectually endowed than Bush is, nor do I think he ever really had any more integrity and he would have let Cheney have his way much the way Bush has, whether he let him appoint himself to the ticket in the veep spot or put him at State, or Defense, or even the CIA we would have witnessed much the same outcome, as I think Cheney would have "served" in some post of significant influence.

With or without Cheney, all the other neocons we have seen acting out in positions of influence in the bush admin would have been in a McCain admin. It would have been as much of a catastrophe - with just a different puppet out front.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. I agree with sonoradesertdem
The only thing I realize in hindsight is that McCain was always an asshole. His "I am the fair-minded maverick" act is only now so apparent. Fool us once your fault, fool us twice our fault. Or as President Bush said," Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizbitchwitchy Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wow, Will Pitt!
What an important, valuable and truley sad lesson in this story. You are truley magic sometimes - I just hope that magic belongs to all of us - like it does here. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. not sure if he deserved respect, or was just a media icon
"Once upon a time, John McCain was a man who commanded and deserved great respect. Beyond the awe-inspiring courage and strength that marked his Vietnam service was the integrity he displayed, for the most part, in his political life. While his conservative views did not jibe with many, there was something about his conduct in office, his independence of thought within the rigid confines of his party, that made Americans stand up and take notice. Even the scandals involving him, most notably the embarrassing Keating Five debacle, did not permanently tarnish his image....they saw in McCain a man of honor whose politics did not matter as much as the apparent content of his character."

It was the media that bowed before his character and constantly trumpeted his integrity. It is the M$M and the RWNM which wants to make politics about 'character' and 'integrity' rather than policies and issues. Character is something they can puff up, in the case of McCain, Powell, and Rice and something they can tear down, as in the case of Clinton, Gore, and Kerry. AND, it was the M$M at least as much as McCain that was out there with the pom-poms shouting "Give me a W!! Give me an A!! Give me and R!! What's that spell?!!!1!" Now these war cheerleaders want to pass themselves as war critics, not because they are against the war, but because they think they could run it better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Lickspittle. Love it.
Then there's toady, sycophant, tufthunter, cat's paw, ass-kisser, flunky, suck-up...there are just so many GOOD words to describe this BAD man.

DUers, feel free to chime in

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. That was a powerful piece of writing.


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. Senility is setting in with McCain, he figures he'll toot Bush's horn and simply occupy the WH.
McCain takes a stroll with overhead cover , over 50 humvee's 100's of military guarding and makes the pathetic claim that, hey! even you can do it too folks...vote for me?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. McLame made a fool out of himself on
April Fool's Day. At least his timing was correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. What a fantastic summary of "21st Century McCain"!! Highly recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. Oh, good God. You no doubt have a point, but you've damn near
Edited on Fri Apr-06-07 04:07 PM by Morgana LaFey
BURIED IT under all the hyperbole in those first two paragraphs without drowning. Shit -- trying to get through it is heavy, heavy slogging. Whew.

You could use an editor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I've been saying that for years.
Edited on Fri Apr-06-07 04:08 PM by WilliamPitt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. ya think?
That's not what I thought. When I read it, I didn't realize it was a Will Pitt piece. As I read on, I said, "Holy @$%#@, who the hell wrote this!" and I mean in a good way, as in a who has the guts to say this kind of thing. That's when I checked to see who the writer was.

The opening two paragraphs drew me in. What a word picture!



Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
42. I was captivated by this sentence in the midst of those paragraphs.
Edited on Sat Apr-07-07 09:45 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
"Translated into mathematical terms, McCain's walk was Pythagorean in scope, squared hypocrisy added to squared idiocy equaling squared disgrace."


What was slogging for you, was fascinated reading for me.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
29. I said all this in my thoughts......
You must be a mind reader too.

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. Never much liked McCain personally. But, I think your thoughts sum up the feelings of many.
Well said as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascagraphic Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
31. first-rate article, thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
33. Integrity in politics, to the extent it exists, is the antithesis of normal commerce:
it is often bought by the lowest bidder. I do love your wordsmith on this, though:

"There is bad, there is awful, and then there is this thing, this quantum singularity of ignominy that bends the very light now shining upon it."

Ernest Gann would give you accolades for that luminescent bit of prose, and Mark Morford should envy them. :D




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. A very palpable hit, Will.
Were a man to read his elegy, and it was this, he might well die to know it befit him--strong yet accurate words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
35. Possible McCain saw how well lies and BS worked for Bush & tried it himself??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
36. You put into eloquent words the reasons for the distress I feel at his shameful fall
I used to respect the man, and when I say that here I realize that many do not remember a time when the parties were not split and polarized by evil design from the far right. Although I've always been a Democrat, there was a time when I could respect and even admire certain conservatives. McCain was one of them, and now he has been co-opted and destroyed by slime from without and something tragic from within his own soul.

The very definition of tragedy is the fall of a great man. It hurts to recall his better days, it hurts to see where he is now.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
39. "...one overly loud mouse-fart away from being paved with flaming lead..."
gyad, I love the way this guy writes!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
40. And off this goes to my good friend who
happens to be a Republican living in NH.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
41. This is a superb piece. It should be your writing, rather than Klein's, gracing
the editorial pages of Time.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
43. Anyone got a fork?
I believe, as the OP so brilliantly delineated, the twin-tined speaking McCain is quite done.


What happened?

"And then, something happened(emphasis added). It started slowly, with McCain appearing to set aside his anger to defend Bush as the 2004 presidential contest approached. . .."

The sting of defeat? The searing resentment of being bested by the likes of the sub-human Rove and paper-thin candidate Bush? The Promise of Glory in 2008 to finally feed the beastly addiction to Power instigated by the pheromones in *'s armpit?

Or, as my opinion holds, he drank the kool-aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC