Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karen Hughes-Spills Torture Beans-Makes Herself # 1 Witness Against BUSHCO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:06 PM
Original message
Karen Hughes-Spills Torture Beans-Makes Herself # 1 Witness Against BUSHCO
Edited on Tue May-19-09 08:09 PM by kpete
Karen Hughes just made herself witness #1 should anyone decide to put her and the rest of the Cheney-Bush gang on trial.

Karen Hughes Spills Some Important Torture Beans
Submitted by Bob Fertik on May 19, 2009 - 5:53pm.

......................

Karen Hughes was closer to George Bush than anyone except Karl Rove - perhaps even closer. She was Bush's press pitbull during his six years as governor and during his Presidential campaign, then became "Counselor to the President." So this is a startling revelation (h/t Ben Armbruster):

She acknowledged the current uproar over interrogation tactics and allegations of prisoner torture during the Bush years.

“I was very vocal in the internal debate,” she said. “I worried about how that would make us look in the eyes of the world. But I had left the White House when a lot of that was taking place.”

Then she paused, worried for the first time in 90 minutes that she’d made a gaffe. Whatever Sen. John McCain says about interrogation techniques, she added quickly, she has similar views.

more at:
http://www.democrats.com/karen-hughes-spills-some-important-torture-beans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. If they were smart they'd lay low, maybe even leave the country.
Then again if they were smart they wouldn't have hitched their wagon to Junior and his Evil Minder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
54. they can't safely leave the country
these were international war crimes. they could be facing the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. But they could google "countries that are not signatories of the Geneva Accords"
and go live in one of them...they would certainly be interesting places, just not Paris...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. And no extradition treaties...
Edited on Wed May-20-09 01:27 PM by glitch
edit: of course they could always rejoin their alien lizard communities at the bottom of the ocean, or on Mars or wherever. Just not here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. What an icke thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. Lol!
What if he really is kinda psychic (or whatever) but he's got his wires crossed a bit.

IOW, because bushco operate mainly in their reptilian brains and don't use their frontal lobes all that much, he mis-interpreted that psychic message to mean lizard aliens?
Meanwhile the spirits (or whatever) giving him the messages keep slapping their foreheads (or whatever), saying not reptilian aliens you idiot, reptilian brains!@#$!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. That's the most brilliant theory I ever heard about Icke.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. Thanks! It's just that he seems so earnest, and I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt
somehow. It was the best I could come up with. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:57 PM
Original message
Delete
Edited on Wed May-20-09 01:59 PM by Politicalboi
Computer is acting up double posted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #58
66. Yes but are those countries
Going to want the world down their throat for harboring a war criminal? If they put a reward on her head someone would take them up on it. If the population sees it different than their government she wouldn't be safe anywhere. This is not the 1940's where not too many people could recognize Nazi's but Karen Hughes is easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. So no place is safe, eh? Perhaps she will undergo plastic surgery and dye her hair.
This would make a pretty good novel, actually...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
63. Big Oooooops! That's what
happens when you make a living from being the bush "press pitbull" with your motormouth..once in while your mouth is going to work faster than your brain.:silly:

And, oh, didn't she sound in a defensive mode?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. I wonder if this Hughes appearance means that BusCo is out trying to
cover Junior's @ss now.

In addition to all the other people I don't miss, Karen Hughes and Victoria Clarke are RIGHT up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rats are jumping ship with tasteless haste
Keep talking Karen - remember you headed to the Middle East to win hearts and minds after the torture.

Who will destroy whom first. It's so good watching while war criminals fall out and it's every man and woman for him/herself - :popcorn:

Bring it on Karen, bring it on!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Time to let out a little more rope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
38. Exactly.
All you need to do is keep a microphone in front of these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tclambert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
73. No rope. It is important to demonstrate the rule of law
in all its slow, methodical glory. Show them how they should have treated others. Show the world how the process should work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I always wondered why she left her job so abruptly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
36. Me too! It obviously wasn't about "spending more time with the family". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Keeeeep talkin', Karen.
Keep talkin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Get her under oath, Mr. Special Prosecutor!!
Oh. . . .wait. . .


damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. I was thinking that when I first read her quote earlier
It's quite a major departure from the usual "It's legal and we were forced to do it" talking point.

Yes, by all means, add her to the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. She is in the LOOP....soon, she and the others will rounded up and taken to the Bastille
Edited on Tue May-19-09 08:21 PM by opihimoimoi
May the cell block dloors have smelly straw and tons of bed mites, skin mites, and centerpedes....add fleas and ticks to the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. The Rats!
Don't forget the rats........oh, wait. Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. Waterboard her...make her talk and spill them beans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. they ALL knew
Edited on Tue May-19-09 08:25 PM by spanone
all the bu$hites
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Methinks she should be interrogated immediately.
Nice how she puts distance, I got out of there fast when I saw it all going south in a hurry.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Can't wait to hear more from Matalin - she's the one who really knows.
Edited on Tue May-19-09 08:39 PM by peacetalksforall
Hughes = Bush.
Matalin = Cheney.
Matalin = knows stuff really well from insider days around 9-11.

Matalin defending Cheney - so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Do snakes sweat? I ask because if they do then she should be sweating right about now.
That goes for her snake husband as well.

No offense to snakes, or reptiles in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snake in the grass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
51. Thank you.
You almost ruined my day!

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #51
60. lol! I would never want to do that! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
52. No. Snakes are cold-blooded creatures.
And, it takes someone with cold-blood to do what the Bush cabal did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
32. When I hear Matalin I think WHIG. It's all coming unraveled!
What tangled webs we weave when first we practice to deceive! YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
62. While I believe . . ..
9/11 came from inside the White House . . .

And have always thought Mary Matalin a vicious p---- ....

Could she have known something about this 9/11 "pearl harbor" -- ?

Could she be that evil?

And, either Cheney was pretending to heightened paranoia or he is clinically ill . . .

which is it?

I'm guessing it's a fake -- but would be a legitimate alibi for both Cheney and

Bush ... who would be seen as having made their decisions in a time of panic!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. I think Cheney depended on her very much for the press push in his support.
Without looking at the names again, I can't think of one media type person that worked more closely with him - other than the name players and office holders who can be mentioned because they did their thing on the big shows - starting with Cheney himself. I never knew whether a person such as Hadley and many others were on the side of Bush or Cheney. She is the only female other than the DOD blond (whose name I forgot) to speak for Cheney. To me Remsfeld's DOD and Cheney's White House were one and the same. The CIA wasn't 'in; with them in most ways - which is why the WH and DOD went to such lengths to smear them.

Though the WH refused to hold a criminal investigation into 9-11, they finally figured out they could use a Oommission to smear the CIA as well as they could pretend that someone was studying 9-11 - even though it was just a REVIEW of intelligence communications (with little on the contributions of the intelligence units of other countries - an essential part).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. Agree --
9/11 commission was a farce . . .
but I do think the "Osama Determined to Strike Within US" was more of an embarrassment
to Rice than CIA. And fact that Bush ignored that.
And let's remember that Tenet got the ... what is it, the Freedom Medal???
Talk about up is down!

Cheney was leaning extraordinarily hard on CIA to have intelligence turn out the way
they wanted it -- "fixed." Wasn't happening.

There was a huge amount of intelligence that came in -- Russia was so worried about
Bush's ignoring what they were reporting that they went to the United Nations Security
Council. Evidently Russia was kinda worried THEY might become the fall guy in a
"false flag" operation! At any rate, the UN Security Council sent their representatives
to the White House with the Russian intelligence -- and to our intelligence agencies --
re-reporting it all again. That was in AUGUST.

The whole thing is sickening -- and some day soon, I hope, we'll bust thru on all of this
political violence and election steals.


:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. What's so awful is, she thinks that's a perfectly moral thing to say
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. When did we invade Iraq?
The story says Hughes left the White House in 2002. Didn't we invade in 2003?
My goodness, if my sense of the timing is right, it bolsters the notion that the torture was used to manufacture a case for attacking Iraq before we went in...
Or have I got it wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
39. March 19 2003
NO I am sorry it was MArch 20..............BUT it was SO CLEARLY going to happen.............on the 19th I took a tech course up along the Canadian border, and listened to CBC on the way there and home ( 2 hours) It was a done deal to the dismay of the Canadians!
It was a done deal to a lot of Mainers the summer of 2002, as well. In early 2003, A man who had gotten RICH off opening "managed" hospitals in Russia after detant, was part of the planning of an Iraq Business Group. At the time Iraq had excellent hospitals and many sophisticated, modern Drs. It WAS NOT A 3RD WORLD COUNTRY! Why would you hold a conference to discuss that unless you had plans to go in and destroy the exhisting hospitals? The conference was open to other businesses..............and to be held down near KENNEBUCKPORT! how convenient..................... and cost $1,500. for a weekend. NOT for the likes of a small business person who wanted to open a gift shop in Baghdad!
3,000 of us marched in Oct 02, against the invasion! That's a LOT of people to bring out, here in MAine with a small population!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
64. Yes, I think you very well have it right -- quite some telling dates -- !!!
Edited on Wed May-20-09 01:42 PM by defendandprotect
Evidently Bush began to wiretap American citizens the moment he walked into the

Oval Office -- seven months before 9/11!!!

The War in Afghanistan, which began on October 7, 2001 as the U.S. military operation Operation Enduring Freedom

They could have been torturing Afghanistani's for more than a year before we invaded Iraq !!???

Some day we will find out the truth of all of this . . Oh, the fates!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. Rachel is discussing this NOW n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. COUNTDOWN VIDEO - Keith discusses it in 'Still Bushed!' segment:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Countdown reruns about two or three times
It is on in the wee hours for the insomniacs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
48. And online for non-cable. So helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Rachel Maddow had a good sly comment about this tonight.
How striking it is that with the Bush / Cheney administration defunct and discredited, former officials are claiming to have disagreed with their criminal decisions vociferously, just not so vociferously that anyone could hear them at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. When feet THAT big get stuck in one's mouth ..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. Did all the members of WHIG all know what was going on?
When Hughes refers to the internal debates and "how that would make us look in the eyes of the world," does she mean WHIG?

The White House Iraq Group was formed in August 2002 -- the month when Abu Zubaydah was being waterboarded -- to discuss how to sell the war. The members were:

Karl Rove
Karen Hughes
Jim Wilkinson (author of the Al Gore invented the Internet meme in 2000, deputy WH communications director under Hughes, later deputy national security advisor for communications)
Scooter Libby
Condi Rice
Stephen Hadley
Andrew Card
Mary Matalin
Nicholas Callo (legislative liaison)

Wilkinson and Callo don't seem to be significant figures -- but the others certainly were. Especially Condi -- and I've always kind of wondered what she was doing on an essentially PR/propaganda team like WHIG.

These guys got discussed a lot in terms of the Plame outing. Should we be pulling out our old notes again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. would she have been entitled to classified information at that point?
i thought she was officially in a purely political role.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. Just imagine what she'd spill if she was water-boarded!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
25. This is an interesting point: "her work with WHIG may have been illegal"
4. Even after she left the White House, Hughes was a member of the White House Iraq Group (WHIG), which was created by Andy Card in August 2002 to "market" the invasion of Iraq. Without a White House job, her work with WHIG may have been illegal. She may also be unable to claim Executive Privilege to avoid subpoenas about that work.


I wonder if the interview was taped. Anyone know?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
28. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
29. Note she doesn't care that it was immoral & illegal just how it would make them look.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
30. all the roaches are coming out, keep spilling the beans!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
njlib Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. Could this be an indication that the heat is being turned up
behind the scenes? Is something coming down the pike that hasn't been made public and the "insiders" are looking to cover their asses now? While I get frustrated at times, I really do think Obama is giving them the rope to hang themselves. I think he's the smartest, most politically savvy president we've had in a long time. I can see it playing out as "While I personally was in favor of moving forward, in light of recent revelations, we have no choice but to investigate and prosecute". He knows what he's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. I agree...........
I think people are quietly working on it. He is smarter than most of us.
( No I don't think he is the Messiah of divinely inspired, just one smart man with a string sense of justice.
And his idea of justice may not be as left leaning as some of us...............but it is there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
33. I'd love to see the Wetnurse to the Beast testify in court...
The Bible would burst into flames when she laid her right hand upon it to swear to tell the truth before God. Oh, I forgot...it would be a copy of "My Pet Goat".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
34. this mess is coming apart at the seams.
:popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. she's worried... they all are... that's why so many shills
are on tv trying to excuse this admin's sick behavior. Doing what they did, didn't take courage, it took insanity and a major disconnect to do what they did, which makes them unsuitable for any position in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
37. Need to put her statement in a timeline of the torture issue
Edited on Wed May-20-09 09:56 AM by ThomWV
When was her time of service because it confirms the debate prior to her departure. It would be interesting if she left before the memos were signed, for instance. I've seen timelines, don't have a link to one though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. 2002 and 2007
Edited on Wed May-20-09 12:10 PM by peacetalksforall
Here you are:

1.) An Influential Bush Adviser, Karen Hughes, Will Resign
From the NYT
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
Published: Wednesday, April 24, 2002
Karen P. Hughes, a confidant of President Bush who became one of the most powerful women ever to serve in the White House, announced today that she was leaving her job to move with her ''homesick'' family back to Texas.

2.)And the date of resignation from her Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy was October 31, 2007.

We need the date she started her Under Sec job - I think there was a gap.

Will look for it and edit, if I find it.

Edit #1:
I edited the clip and paste paragraph from the NYT to add the Subject Line - Influential Bush Adviser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
41. What torture trials?
She wouldn't be talking about it if she thought she might end up being called as a witness in a trial, now would she?

She's just another Bush lapdog being dispatched to revise history. Nothing more. And probably being paid well to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Oh, she'd absolutely be talking about it!
Edited on Wed May-20-09 10:45 AM by Raksha
She wants to go on record as early as possible as being opposed to torture. I think she's looking for immunity in exchange for her testimony against the rest of the rat pack. That sounds like an excellent idea to me...I bet she could tell some interesting stories!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
42. K & R!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
44. She was really, really important!
Ooops.

:popcorn:

Hope she enjoys being under oath; hopefully, it'll happen sooner than later!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
45. So, Karen, tell us: Who suggested they waterboard Zubaydeh in 8/02 until he was an artichoke?
Why did the White House order the CIA to waterboard Abu Zubaydeh at least 83 times, and why was this done without monitoring his blood-oxygen level, resulting in nearly certain severe brain damage and memory loss?

Such monitoring is a routine part of any procedure where respiration may be interrupted. The device that measures oxygen levels, a pulse oxomiter, is hardly an exotic medical instrument - they cost less than $50 dollars each and are in common use in clinics, dental offices, and geriatric care facilities around the world. Many Scuba divers and mountain climbers use them to monitor for anoxia, a drop in oxygen levels.

Abu Zubaydeh reportedly blacked out and almost died after he was waterboarded repeatedly and for extended periods without oxygen monitoring.

This wasn't something that was done in some isolated cellar by untrained goons. CCTV video cameras broadcast every one of his interrogations to Washington and Langley. These sessions, carried out at Baghram Air Base, were overseen by experts in waterboarding who had developed the SERE program for the U.S. military. These contractors were paid a thousand dollars a day plus expenses for their subject matter expertise.

The Agency's own recordings of these sessions were later ordered destroyed by Director of CIA Clandestine Operations Jose A. Rodriguez. It was Rodriguez who had been in charge of the unit, the Director's Counter-Terrorism Center (CIA/CTC), that actually carried out the torture of Abu Zubaydeh and the waterboarding of two other "high-value" detainees. Under the previous Director, Cofer Black (1999-May 17, 2002), that unit had monitored the al-Qaeda planning summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia where AZ and several of the principal 9/11 hijackers planned out the 9/11 attack.

Cofer Black had been CIA Chief of Station in Sudan in the mid-1990s when bin Laden and Abu Zubaydeh were running their own worldwide operations from that location, including the training of Islamic militants for combat in Bosnia and later Chechnya. AZ trained six the principal 9/11 hijackers, originally recruited for such operations against the Russians.

Based on ongoing NSA monitoring of Nawaf al-Midhar, in December 1999, Black's CTC monitored preparations and travel to the Kuala Lumpur summit of the future Flt. 77 hijackers and others who planned there and went on to lead the "Planes Operation". The attendees were tracked as they scattered and went their various ways. CTC monitored the January 15, 2000 arrival at LAX of al-Midhar and his partner, Khalid al-Hazmi. A series of at least three warning cables drafted by FBI liason officers at CTC were drafted about the Kuala Lumpur meeting and the travels of the future Flt. 77 hijackers, but these were ordered withheld by the Assistant Director of CTC, a man identified as "Robert B". See, http://journals.democraticunderground.com/leveymg/413

What was it that AZ knew that the White House and CIA Director thought was so important that he had to be waterboarded into a vegetative state?

The connection of the 9/11 hijackers and CIA itself provides an apparent motive. Was there another group with a possible interest in erasing and altering the knowledge that Abu Zubaydeh had inside his head?

According to author Gerald Posner, the CIA had already extracted the most important facts from AZ before he was waterboarded. Abu Aubaydeh was captured in Pakistan in late March 2002. While he was still recovering from gunshot wounds to his groin and abdomen suffered during his capture, he was transferred from Pakistan to the "dark prison" in Afghanistan.

Initially, his interrogation was done more by guile than torture, and AZ was still quite intact after he divulged the "Rosetta Stone", some of most critical information about the 9/11 operation: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gerald-posner/the-cias-destroyed-inter_b_75850.html

In my 2003 New York Times bestseller, Why America Slept: The Failure to Prevent 9/11, I discussed Abu Zubaydah at length in Chapter 19, "The Interrogation." There I set forth how Zubaydah initially refused to help his American captors. Also, disclosed was how U.S. intelligence established a so-called "fake flag" operation, in which the wounded Zubaydah was transferred to Afghanistan under the ruse that he had actually been turned over to the Saudis. The Saudis had him on a wanted list, and the Americans believed that Zubaydah, fearful of torture and death at the hands of the Saudis, would start talking when confronted by U.S. agents playing the role of Saudi intelligence officers.

Instead, when confronted by his "Saudi" interrogators, Zubaydah showed no fear. Instead, according to the two U.S. intelligence sources that provided me the details, he seemed relieved. The man who had been reluctant to even confirm his identity to his U.S. captors, suddenly talked animatedly. He was happy to see them, he said, because he feared the Americans would kill him. He then asked his interrogators to call a senior member of the Saudi royal family. And Zubaydah provided a private home number and a cell phone number from memory. "He will tell you what to do," Zubaydah assured them

That man was Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdul-Aziz, one of King Fahd's nephews, and the chairman of the largest Saudi publishing empire. Later, American investigators would determine that Prince Ahmed had been in the U.S. on 9/11.

American interrogators used painkillers to induce Zubaydah to talk -- they gave him the meds when he cooperated, and withdrew them when he was quiet. They also utilized a thiopental sodium drip (a so-called truth serum). Several hours after he first fingered Prince Ahmed, his captors challenged the information, and said that since he had disparaged the Saudi royal family, he would be executed. It was at that point that some of the secrets of 9/11 came pouring out. In a short monologue, that one investigator told me was the "Rosetta Stone" of 9/11, Zubaydah laid out details of how he and the al Qaeda hierarchy had been supported at high levels inside the Saudi and Pakistan governments.

He named two other Saudi princes, and also the chief of Pakistan's air force, as his major contacts. Moreover, he stunned his interrogators, by charging that two of the men, the King's nephew, and the Pakistani Air Force chief, knew a major terror operation was planned for America on 9/11.

It would be nice to further investigate the men named by Zubaydah, but that is not possible. All four identified by Zubaydah are now dead. As for the three Saudi princes, the King's 43-year-old nephew, Prince Ahmed, died of either a heart attack or blood clot, depending on which report you believe, after having liposuction in Riyadh's top hospital; the second, 41-year-old Prince Sultan bin Faisal bin Turki al-Saud, died the following day in a one car accident, on his way to the funeral of Prince Ahmed; and one week later, the third Saudi prince named by Zubaydah, 25-year-old Prince Fahd bin Turki bin Saud al-Kabir, died, according to the Saudi Royal Court, "of thirst." The head of Pakistan's Air Force, Mushaf Ali Mir, was the last to go. He died, together with his wife and fifteen of his top aides, when his plane blew up -- suspected as sabotage -- in February 2003. Pakistan's investigation of the explosion -- if one was even done -- has never been made public.

Zubaydah is the only top al Queda operative who has secretly linked two of America's closest allies in the war on terror -- Saudi Arabia and Pakistan -- to the 9/11 attacks. Why does Bush, and the CIA, continue to protect the Saudi Royal family and the Pakistani military, from the implications of Zubaydah's confessions?


Yet another explanation for intensity of Abu Zubaydeh's waterboarding has recently emerged. There are a number of observers who have speculated in the last month that AZ was tortured into false confessions intended to link al-Qaeda with Iraqi WMD programs. This theory is reinforced by the prison "suicide" of In al-Shayk al-Libi, who was captured before AZ, the confessions of whom served as the source of much of the Bush-Cheney Administration's phony charges that Iraq had trained AQ operatives in chemical and bioloigical warfare.

Of course, none of these accounts exclude the others, and there to have been multiple groups at various levels of the Bush Administration and the CIA with their own motives to alter or erase the memory of Abu Zubaydeh and other 9/11 detainees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. The Vulcans
I found this one day searching for something else. I found it interesting enough to bookmark it.

The term Vulcans as you will see comes from a statue in Birmingham Alabama. What interested me was the description of who the statue represented. :tinfoilhat: the Roman God of Fire and Metalworking.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vulcans


In early 1999, a team largely drawn from the middle echelons of the first Bush administration began to act as foreign policy advisors to George W. Bush.<2>

Richard Armitage had performed various ambassador and emissary roles around the world for Bush Sr.
Robert Blackwill had been Presidential Assistant for European and Soviet Affairs for Bush Sr.
Stephen Hadley had been U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy.
Richard Perle had been U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense during the Reagan administration.
Condoleezza Rice
Paul Wolfowitz
Dov Zakheim had been U.S. Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Planning and Resources.
Robert Zoellick had been aide to U.S. Secretary of State James Baker.
The name "The Vulcans" alludes to a huge statue of Vulcan, the Roman god of fire and metalworking, in Rice’s home town of Birmingham, Alabama.

In early 1999, the Vulcans held their first meeting in Austin, Texas, which was attended by Cheney and Shultz. The group communicated regularly afterward.<3>



I wonder if Karen attended any of those meetings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
46. #5 from that link
5. It's likely some of the "internal debate" about torture occurred within WHIG, so investigators should FOIA/subpoena its records. The other WHIG members were Andy Card, Karl Rove (who served as chair), James Wilkinson, Mary Matalin, Nick Calio, Stephen Hadley, Condi Rice, and Scooter Libby.


Mary Matalin must be pissed as hell that Karen let this slip. And you know Cheney and Libby are both pissed that GWB didn't pardon Libby.

WHIG doesn't get the protection of the White House, boy oh boy, talk about subpoenas to be served and testimony to take.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
47. Repugs are cursed with some increasingly stupid virus
I swear with each passing day I can't believe they could possibly get any dumber.

But then I am forced to say, "I am in total awe!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
53. The problem with lies is you have to remember what you said
Whereas when you tell the truth it's easy to remember it without having to remember what you said.

They're sure weaving a Gordian knot tangled web from which they're hanging themselves

tee-hee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. not only that
you have to hope your co-conspirators remember what *they* said. And you have to make sure that whatever you say doesn't conflict with what they say.

Oh, can it get messy once it all starts to unravel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
55. Here's a four part timeline with some interesting phrasing from the media:
2002: LEFT
An Influential Bush Adviser, Karen Hughes, Will Resign (Subject Line)
From the NYT
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
Published: Wednesday, April 24, 2002
Karen P. Hughes, a confidant of President Bush who became one of the most powerful women ever to serve in the White House, announced today that she was leaving her job to move with her ''homesick'' family back to Texas.

2005: RETURNED
Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-brown/the-second-coming-of-kare_b_59851.html
John Brown column

Bush's propaganda czarina Karen Hughes -- her official jawbreaking title is Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs -- has had her ups and downs since being sworn in her State Department position in September 2005. When the long-time Bush confidante rejoined the "mission-accomplished" team in her new international-image-polishing job (she had been, among her previous capacities, a member of the secretive White House Iraq Group that led our country into war), some public-diplomacy veterans hoped that her close relationship with the President would make "engaging, informing, and influencing key international audiences" (the State Department's definition of public diplomacy) more successful than it had been during our Commander in Chief's first term.
But Bush Kampaigner Karen's first public foray into world affairs -- her infamous "listening tour" to the Middle East in the fall of 2005 -- was ridiculed by both the US and international media as an illustration of her ignorance (she disclosed, to an Egyptian opposition leader, that our Constitution cites "one nation under God") and lack of cultural sensitivity (she offended some Saudi women by reproaching them for not having the right to drive). After that disastrous overseas venture, she seemed to keep a lower profile, and by 2006 was practically off the media radar screen, especially during the Second Lebanese War. When she did engage in rare (for her official position) public events (many directed to American audiences to show them how good we US citizens were because of our compassionate-conservative aid to less fortunate foreigners) she was not infrequently criticized, including by the right-wing media, which accused her of being too accommodating to Muslim organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).


2007: LEFT AGAIN
31 October 2007 - left Undersecretary job.

2009: JOINED FIRM
Wednesday, Jul 09
Former Bush Aide Karen Hughes Joins Burson-Marsteller

Burson-Marsteller announced a big hire today, naming former U.S. Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs and top aide to George W. Bush, Karen Hughes as Global Vice Chair.

Hughes adds to a team with significant beltway experience, including Don Baer, formerly the White House Communications Director for President Bill Clinton, who joined the firm this past November.

Former top Clinton strategist and Burson CEO Mark Penn said in a statement, "I cannot think of anyone better suited to counsel our clients."

SOOOOOOO.....

So, was she in the WHIG group between 2002 and 2005?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sunnyshine Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
57. If these neo-cons had an internal debate over this...
We know something was, and still is, really very wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
61. Thank you -- watching last night but got distracted . . . always valuable
to have someone follow a story like this for us . . .

Karen Hughes . . . hmmmmmmmmmmm

Mary Matalin . . . hmmmmmmmmmmmm

As a woman -- sad to see and I hope one of them will try to redeem themselves . . . !!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felinetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
69. I say let the Democrats start talking about Karen Hughes and stop talking about Pelosi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
70. Bookmarking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
74. she and ari f bailed their sorry asses out of there as soon as
they knew about the 'torture'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Looks like it
She's seems like a pretty smart person to have that much foresight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
76. Karen Hughes is about as trustworthy as Cheney...
Wouldn't it be great if all these untrustworthy people had to testify to save their own asses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
78. There is no need for any torturers to worry. If you missed Rachel
and her interview tonight of Michael Isikoff, try to see it on line. The meeting today of Obama and the human rights organizations did not go well for us liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC