To say I support the Iraq bill, and most of all I hope they are not going to let the rez & publicans win the pr battle on this. I said I hope they make the point that if the rez vetoes the bill he is actually the one denying funding to the troops. If you'd like to call also, the numbers are below.
show that if bush wants the troops there and the larger amount of troops, he'll just keep them there until Jan 09 because he has funding built in or something like that.
But sooner or later when you rob from Paul to pay Peter, Peter needs the money back. Also, the Pentagon always wants as muvh as it can get and are saying (according to Murtha) they need funds by June 1.
9. I find it important to reiterate what several Duers and Cindy Sheehan have already said.
This never was about funding the troops; it is about funding corporations including Halliburton and blackwater. With the exception of the part of this particular bill which goes to wounded soldiers and vets. "Funding the troops" and "supporting the troops" are both scams. The funding goes to greedy right-wing corporations.
Halliburton/KBR/Blackwater are getting rich while our government sends our young people to fight a war, many of whom come back physically or mentally injured. or dead.
We are now entering the most critical period in which Bush will play chicken with the Congress. The Congress must hold firm and not be intimidated by the propaganda blitz.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.