Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Toon time: Tom the Dancing Bug

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 11:07 AM
Original message
Toon time: Tom the Dancing Bug
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 11:07 AM by geardaddy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
argonchloride Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Somebody on the boobtube called Social Security a Ponzi scheme the other day
I just heard a snip and didn't catch who said it. There's a lot of truth to it in any case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, those plans that help the greater good, nothin' but scams.
You sure you're in the right place? :shrug:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
argonchloride Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Is it your contention that Ponzi schemes help the 'greater good'?
Whatever that is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think you took a wrong turn near Albequerque...
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 12:29 PM by Hissyspit
And Julie is clearly arguing that Social Security is not a Ponzi Scheme, because it isn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
argonchloride Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Actually, I was born in Albuquerque...I think SS is a great program but it
absolutely does fit the classic definition of a Ponzi. What else would you call a system that depends on more and more contributions to pay off previous investors? (By the way, plenty of Democrats have made the same comment...is there some rule around here against reporting on what public officials say...in public?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. LOL Yes, you made the wrong turn when you were born!
Sorry, just kidding.

Seriously, a key element of a Ponzi Scheme is fraud. There is no fraud in Social Security. Social Security also does NOT depend on more and more contributions technically, although it is not fraudulent to assume population growth and inflation. You are putting in money now to help people now in return for being helped later. That is not a Ponzi Scheme.

No, there is no rule on reporting on what public officials say in public, but people here are not too fond of fallacious Republican Talking Points being repeated without critical analysis.

Welcome to DU!

:toast:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. "More and more?"
With a more or less constant workforce, the system sustains itself indefinitely. It's when the workforce (or, more exactly, its aggergated income) diminishes that the previous generation may find themselves with less funds to pay THEIR benefits. Other possible cause for a systemic failure is maladministration. But none of that is intrinsic to the system's mechanics.

Therefore, SS isn't a Ponzi scheme, despite what RW pundits put in the Kool-Aid you drank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Enjoy your short stay.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
argonchloride Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thank you but did I miss something? Didn't you put the cartoon up that calls the USA
a giant Ponzi scheme?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. A Ponzi scheme for the rich.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Any economy that depends on constant expansion to stay healthy DOES resemble a Ponzi scheme.
Unlike SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. OMG...I think you're onto something
And uh-oh, don't look now, but here come the black helicopters from the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Funny that he didn't call insurance a ponzi scheme
Guess he receives campaign funds from them. Ah well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm surprised this got so many K&Rs, I find it asinine at best
I certainly don't see anything funny about it and to suggest that the founding fathers were simply developing a ponzi scheme based on manifest destiny is simply asinine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I read it the opposite way
Is it asinine to suggest that the founding fathers were developing a Ponzi scheme? Yes, it is. That's the point of the satire. We've been running the country in a way that's not at all like what the Framers envisioned.

It's a criticism of our recent rules, not of Benny, T.J., and Johnny A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. That's how I read it, too.
Especially knowing Tom The Dancing Bug. It certainly has some depth as satire, I would argue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. Perfect n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC