Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New U.S. intelligence report warns 'victory' not certain in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:15 PM
Original message
New U.S. intelligence report warns 'victory' not certain in Iraq
http://www.centredaily.com/505/story/1023880.html

Thursday, Dec. 18, 2008

WASHINGTON — A nearly completed high-level U.S. intelligence analysis warns that unresolved ethnic and sectarian tensions in Iraq could unleash a new wave of violence, potentially reversing the major security and political gains achieved over the last year.

U.S. officials familiar with the new National Intelligence Estimate said they were unsure when the top-secret report would be completed and whether it would be published before the Nov. 4 presidential election.

More than a half-dozen officials spoke to McClatchy on condition of anonymity because NIE's, the most authoritative analyses produced by the U.S. intelligence community, are restricted to the president, his senior aides and members of Congress except in rare instances when just the key findings are made public.

The new NIE, which reflects the consensus of all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, has significant implications for Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama, whose differences over the Iraq war are a major issue in the presidential campaign.

The findings seem to cast doubts on McCain's frequent assertions that the United States is "on a path to victory" in Iraq by underscoring the deep uncertainties of the situation despite the 30,000-strong U.S. troop surge for which he was the leading congressional advocate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ugh......Can the NIE define "victory"?
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 09:17 PM by marmar
Of course not. It's a nebulous concept. I'm so sick of them using that term.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. well *duh*
most of us knew that years ago. no one listened. there is no *winning* an occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hell,
we were saying that before the frikkin' invasion........ :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've often wondered what
"victory" in Iraq meant... and I am still perplexed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obligatory DUHHHH!
I thought Iraq will split up into 3 separate entities when the war started
because I knew about Iraq after the first war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. any intelligent person knows there is no victory to be had
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Do they also warn that the Confederacy may lose the civil war?
The war in Iraq was lost the day the first GI crossed the border from Kuwait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. And guess who will get the blame...
It sure won't be Commander Idiot In Chief.

Yep, here goes another thirty years of saying, 'we could have won that war if the Democrats would have let us.' The party of "personal responsibility" takes absolutely NO responsibility for their fuck-ups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC