Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cripes. The Fed is heading for zero

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 05:47 PM
Original message
Cripes. The Fed is heading for zero
Well, this is it, the last bullet in the chamber. Didn't work for the Japanese, probably won't do much for us.
The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to establish a target range for the federal funds rate of 0 to 1/4 percent.

...

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; Christine M. Cumming; Elizabeth A. Duke; Richard W. Fisher; Donald L. Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner; Sandra Pianalto; Charles I. Plosser; Gary H. Stern; and Kevin M. Warsh.

In a related action, the Board of Governors unanimously approved a 75-basis-point decrease in the discount rate to 1/2 percent. In taking this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Minneapolis, and San Francisco. The Board also established interest rates on required and excess reserve balances of 1/4 percent.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20081216b.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's time we simply bought the Fed back and fires those assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm actually quite happy the Fed is making these decisions and not you.
If the Fed weren't lowering interet rates and printing more money to avoid crippling deflation, now that might be cause for concern. But because the Fed is doing what most pragmatic economists are calling for, I'm not worried. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Yeah - Thank God a private for profit Coropration controlled by republicans controls our money
and our Inflation - and can give away our tax dollars with no oversight form elected officials

Yep - Thank god for Greenspan huh?

Yeah - where would we be if we hadn't had this Private Corporate controlling all of this


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. i'm holding out for -1%...
when they start paying people to borrow money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. In other news impotent guy fires blanks .........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hmmm, yet I'm still paying 8.5% for student loans and 29.99% for credit cards....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Hedgehog
Have you called the loan sharks charging you 29.99%?
If not, give it a try. The banks seem to be more willing to bend a little.
Perhaps due to the anger and bad publicity coming their way these days.
We called our credit card loan sharks today and got our 26.99% usury rate lowered to 6.9% and I managed to get an $800 refund!
It's worth a try, if you haven't already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'll think about it. I just have to wonder if it'll give me a black mark
somewhere that'll make getting credit harder down the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If you don't have any late payments in the last 6 months
tell them that unless they lower your APR significantly you will transfer the balance to a low interest credit card and never do business with them again.

That usually gets them moving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Don't worry
You're only requesting a drop in the interest rate.
It helps to have a little ammo to bargain with, such as a home equity line, a private loan or a transfer of the balance to another card.
Just let them know that 29% is unacceptable and they must either lower the rate or you will leave.
Might have to exaggerate your options a bit, but all's fair in modern American banking.
Just asking them (along with a touch of brinksmanship) won't hurt your credit score and it could save you some real money each month.
Good luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Canceled two cards that wouldn't drop my rate form that loan shark rate of 29.99%.
Edited on Tue Dec-16-08 09:18 PM by sarcasmo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've got good credit. If I went out and got a car loan, would that work in my favor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Got a good dead cat bounce for the market
which means we'll see a few more spectacular falls before Stupid is gone.

The problem is that the second shoe of bad mortgages is about ready to drop, all the fraudulent loans that were extended in 2006 to try to keep the housing bubble pumped up.

Nobody knows quite yet how bad it's going to be, but there's no way any small part of the economy will improve until the disaster is over.

There's no way the economy as a whole is going to improve until people are back at work at wages they can live on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The only way the economy is going to improve is to get our jobs back that have been outsourced.
Bring back the machines that were shipped over seas when the jobs were outsourced.

Install less greedy and more reality grounded CEO's and Corporate Boards.

Rescind person hood for corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Most of those jobs are gone forever
because the infrastructure has also been either offshored or sold for scrap.

The new industrial base should produce and be powered by renewable energy and protected by tariff.

Nothing else will work.

A few office jobs should come back, particularly in extremely sensitive areas like health and finance. Their return should be mandated by US privacy law.

Old smokestack industry is gone. It's not coming back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. It it doesn't come back we never will recover.
This country can not sustain itself on service industries. That is what it is trying to do now. Service industries do not and never have paid well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. There is a huge difference
between the reimportation of smokestack industry and the development of clean industry. I suggested the latter, along with tariffs to keep it here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. So you are telling us that cottage industries is the answer to recovery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No, that's your strawman.
RTDP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Ok, then who is supposed to have the smoke stack industries that
makes the aluminum, iron/steel, copper, zink, raw plastics, etc? Keep letting China do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Tariffs are not magical fairy dust.
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 07:12 AM by yibbehobba
Increasing tariffs is not going to magically spawn new industries. If I'm an investor, am I going to invest in an aluminum production facility whose existence is solely dependent upon a government trade policy that could change at any time, for any reason? That sounds like a very risky bet, especially considering the massive initial investment for infrastructure. What if the tariff is overturned halfway through completion of the facility? Too risky for me, and too risky for most careful investors.

Keep letting China do it?

This may come as a surprise, but China doesn't need our permission to build new industries, and we are far from their only trading partner. Any attempt to damage Chinese industry would be met with reciprocal measures aimed at damaging ours to the point where we would have no choice but to relax our tariffs. This is yet another reason I'd be extremely hesitant to invest in an American aluminum smelting operation.

You ask who is "supposed" to have the smoke stack industries. Well, generally speaking economic activity occurs in the place where it makes the most economic sense. For a smoke stack industry, that primarily comes down to labor costs and availability/cost of raw materials. Leaving aside the materials concerns and focusing solely on labor for a moment, it's fairly easy to understand why basing your economy around unskilled or semi-skilled labor (which is the primary employee base for smoke stack industries) is a bad idea if your labor costs are high. This is why you don't see any western democracies basing their economy on unskilled labor any more. It's not just us, and I don't see how or why we should be any different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I think you missed out on something somewhere.
Or maybe you got all your education from books. Smoke stack industries doesn't necessarily mean semi or unskilled jobs. A lot of high wage, highly skilled jobs went over seas with the demise of our steel industry. To say nothing about the supporting industries that went down the tubes when basic industries got off shored to China and else where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. More shoes after that
The shoes could be falling until 2010 or 2011.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. I just don't understand it.



It wasn't that long ago when Limbaugh and Hannity and the other RW Lying Hatemongers were
telling us how great the BushCo economy is doing. Oh, but wait... That was before the election.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hard on NPR that they are gonna try to manipulate mortgage rates lower.
Sounds good to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. Shit... Our CDs will be making bupkis when they renew
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
25. Oh Good. More Overcontrol
You would think that with 20 years in a row of data showing nearly zero correlation between the Fed's rate adjustment actions and macroeconomic behavior, we'd quit fiddling with the wrong knob!
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC