Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JEB Bush urges GOP to create a “shadow government” during the Obama admin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:30 PM
Original message
JEB Bush urges GOP to create a “shadow government” during the Obama admin
:crazy:


http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/jeb_bush_interview/2008/11/30/156557.html

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush tells Newsmax that the GOP must broaden its appeal to avoid becoming “the old white-guy party,” and recommends that Republicans create a “shadow government” to engage Democrats on important issues as the incoming Obama administration seeks to enact its agenda.

...

Bush’s other advice on where the GOP should go from here:

# The party should establish a loyal opposition and “organize ourselves in the form of a shadow government” that would address key issues, providing the public with “a loftier debate about policy” rather than mere partisanship.

...

On a personal note, Bush told Newsmax that he wouldn’t be surprised if his father, former President H.W. Bush, jumps out of a plane when he turns 85 in June.

“He likes going fast in boats and he likes jumping out of planes,” he said of his father. “I can’t explain it, but there’s nothing I can do about it!”

Bush added, “Whenever I get a chance, I always ask him about his life, because it’s just been a spectacular life. If I could be half the man my dad has been, I would consider myself having a really privileged life.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah cause Republicans have always shown that they're able
to discuss policy and not get embroiled in petty political dustups! Amirite guys?

Fucking idiots, the whole lot of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcsl1998 Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
73. Jeb Musta Forgot The Shadow Government His Bro' Created Shortly After 9/11
It was actually in the news - Have all of you forgotten, too?!? http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/03/01/attack/main502530.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
80. Occultism is sooooo republicon...
Ptooooey on the anti-American republicon occultists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh goodie, a new Bush on the horizon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. Yes. I suppose that Jeb wants to be "elected" president of this
"shadow cabinet." This is such an obvious ploy. It is mostly likely to set off infighting in the Republican Party. This should be amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Yep...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
88. Yeah, like the name "Bush" is a wonderful thing these days
If my last name were "Bush" I would be looking to change it. Seriously.

Dubya has made a laughingstock of himself and turned his family name into something people say with a look on their faces that suggests they've just swallowed a live cockroach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. So He's Proposing Treason and Sedition?
Aren't there laws about that?
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Laws? For anybody named "Bush?" Silly you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Hey, I Was Just Askin'
I don't remember the part in the Constitution where it says the laws don't apply to some people. Now i have to go read it again and look for the part i missed. LOL!

You know, maybe i'll ask Fat Tony Scalia. He's an originalist. He should know what the framers were THINKING 190+ years before he was born. Maybe he could explain the "special rich people" exemption that i just don't understand!
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Fat Tony would be my choice for Go-To Guy on the Unwritten Privileges of the Overprivileged.
If he didn't know the answer, I'm sure he could make something up on the spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jello Biafra Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
86. They stopped using the Constitution...
They were using the Bible instead the last time I looked....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. We need to frame it something like that and link it to Cheney's
shadow government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Yep
These idiots can't govern. They can't govern at all with no real power. And now they're presuming to "attain" that power through subsersive means.

That's illegal and it's unamerican.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
44. So how is this so different from what they've done the last eight years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
62. Of course this "shadow government" could become a circle jerk and they
become even more out of touch and more delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #62
87. It's always been a circle jerk
but, being repugs, as long as they don't touch each other's d*cks, it's "okay" :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #87
89. Except Larry Craig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Not at all. It's very common in parliamentary democracies
The opposition party has spokespersons (in the legislature) equivalent to the various cabinet posts, so if you don't like a new regulation on, say, agriculture, the shadow agriculture secretary is is in charge of formulating a rebuttal and getting the message out. There's nothing treasonable about it, it's just a way for a party to present itself as a coherent political opposition when out of office as opposed to a disorganized crowd of grumblers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Are we a Parliamentary Democracy?
Sounds like Jeb IS trying to change an awful lot if things with this proposal... no?

Doesn't sound legal at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Doesn't matter. It's an informal arrangement, nothing illegal about it.
Members of a shadow cabinet etc. don't have any legal powers, it's just a way of presenting one's political case to the public and keeping your party organized while in opposition. For that matter, anyone could go out and recruit a bunch of like-minded people and call it a 'citizen's cabinet' if one wanted to present alternative political views. It's like when the President gives the State of the Union speech and the opposition party issues a response right afterwards, they're not laying claim to executive power by doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #26
77. Sorry But I Don't Agree
The analogy doesn't even make sense, since in a parliamentary system there is seldom a separate executive branch with equal power.

So, the comparison is inappropriate.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
90. I agree with you. How is it treason to present an opposing view point? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. They're above the law.
Google "Safari Club" and Prince Bandar for details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
61. Addressing issues and providing debate is treason?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #61
76. Did You Read The Article?
That's rhetorical since you obviously didn't.

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #76
82. Yes, I did. Can you point out any treason or sedition mentioned in it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #76
91. I read the article and I didn't see anything treasonous. Maybe you can help us out. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
72. European countries commonly have "shadow governments"
made up of the opposition.

I don't know how you get the treason and sedition from members of the opposition calling themselves a "shadow government".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #72
78. You Apparently Didn't Read Jeb's Quotes
If you did read them, you would know the rhetoric is far from innoccuous.

And, you're the second person to make a less than apt comparison to parliamentary systems in which there is a far less clear and separate executive branch. The executive branch sets policy and doesn't need a "shadow gov't" structured to oppose.

They have elected officials in Congress. Let them run their opposition in daylight.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #78
85. Its an informal way for the opposition to respond quickly to government
proposals and show the country how they would handle the situation.

I have often thought that the Democrats could have greatly benefited from setting up a shadow government during the Bush years.

I really don't think a "pretend shadow government" would step on anyone's toes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #78
92. Instead of continuing to tell us to read the article, please give us a quote that shows he is being
treasonous (the offense of acting to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign). I do not like Jeb and think he needs to be watched very closely. But I don't agree that he is advocating treason here, AND I READ THE ARTICLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think Cheney has one ready to go. Jeb, go help the old goat move it out of the VP's residence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can we arrest Jeb for incitement to treason now?
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 02:34 PM by shadowknows69
Oh yeah, he's a Bush, sorry. They're rewarded for treasonous behavior since Grandaddy on down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
65. tell me what he's done to incite treason and I'll tell you if we can.
But advocating debate and the expression of dissenting views isn't treason. If it was, Obama would be in jail not waiting to be sworn in as President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Directions to the Vomitorium are straight ahead then bear a hard right
it is a passage situated below or behind a tier of seats in an amphitheatre, through which crowds can "spew out" at the end of a performance.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. DUzy. N/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, let them fuck up in their imagination
instead of for real. We've been there and done that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just when I think I cannot hate the Bush family any more...
another one pops up and gives me a reason.

I fucking despise these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Jeb Bush: in danger of becoming an old-white guy.
Sorry, but I'm ROF,LMAO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. I reckon their shadow President, whoever he might be, if it's not McCain,
would be about 490th in the line of succession to the throne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. It would be Jeb. He wouldn't suggest it if he didn't want to be the
supreme leader. Remember, he was a PNAC member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
46. I wasn't talking about what Jeb or any Republican might have wanted...!
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 04:24 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
I was indicating their prospects! "Mine and Buckleys", as the Kiwis say.

In the UK, there is a list of people next in line of succession to the throne and, to put it mildly, it's mostly kind of meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
63. From what I read it seemed that it is an alternate to the elected government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
60. I'm sure Jeb knows that his brother ran a shadow government
while he was supposed to be running the government. Guess Tony Blair never explained that hhe Shadow government is a Parliamentary thingy for the opposition party. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. bush didn't want to live under our laws, he wanted to be the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Calling for outright TREASON Jebbie?
I certainly hope someone on Obama's team gets this today and starts going into Jeb's background with a fine toothed comb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
54. That's exactly what Jebbie would have called it had the Democrats
mentioned such a thing during the past 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is he suggesting something similar to shadow cabinets?
Parliamentary countries do those a lot, where the main opposition party sets aside a few of its members to be the House critic for insert-spot-here. So if the government has a minister of defense, the opposition appoints one of its members as defense critic, and his/her job is pretty much to focus on whatever the MoD is doing.

In theory it's a good idea that I tend to like, but in practice (at least in Canada the last several eons), it's more or less amounted to starting with the assumption that The Other Guy Can Never Ever Ever Ever Do Anything Right and going from there. It's far less constructive than it really could be, and that depresses me a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. So it seems, but but apparently it's more fun to accuse him of treason
Since I also come from a country with a parliamentary democracy, this just seems normal to me but apparently it's a new concept for many here. Perhaps the OP should have been titled 'Jeb Bush suggests becoming more like Canada'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. The Obvious Difference Being That We Are Not A Parliamentary Democracy
Then there is the matter of the shadow government Cheney set up and has had running since they came into office without informing or including either of the other branches of government. Further, as has been the case over the last 8 years, Jeb (signer of PNAC) and the other neocons' purpose has been to undermine our democracy. There are many who, with good reason, believe his brother in the WH is guilty of treason. Working against the government to further your ideology seems to be a family trait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. I think we're using different definitions of "shadow government" here
The one you use (correctly!) to describe Cheney's setup, and the one that I'm referring to, are pretty different things.

The one in Cheney's sense is actually governing behind the scenes; that's criminal at the very best and is not a trait of parliamentary democracy at all. That's full of badfulness right there, and I won't even think of arguing with anyone who says as much because they're right!

I'm referring to a system of opposition where the opposition tasks several people in their party with the purpose of studying and criticising (when necessary) the actions of their opposing member in the federal cabinet. There's no governing there, unless the critic changes the mind of someone who actually affects policy (or, in the parliamentary case, gets a private member's bill passed). It's not a constitutional setup to my knowledge as much as an informal thing that's become tradition.

I like the latter system; there's nothing legally or ethically wrong with it on the surface, and if one of my guys is the critic then their day job basically involves studying one of the ministries or departments in detail and actually potentially having more than a purely rhetorical grasp on what's going on in it. As well, I like the idea of folks in power being held under a microscope no matter who they are. I consider it to strengthen, not undermine, democracies, as opposed to the sort of situation we can get when a government's criticism actually is weak and disorganized.

Of course, on the other hand there aren't nearly enough drugs in my drinking water to make me trust any of the Bushes currently walking with something like this. I like the idea - though I'd like it more if the Democrats had something similar in place eight years ago - but American politics are also far, far too polarized for it to be workable down there for awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #52
68. Ironic Isn't It
They broke it, now they think their best role, option, is to criticize the person who is going to fix it. An opposition party can in fact serve a constructive role but what I would intuit here, given history and the people involved, is that obstruction is more of what they're going for. This sad, sorry sack of a party doesn't understand what, or why, they have been dismissed from class by the American people and they will obstruct themselves into obscurity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. Oh, I agree completely on this particular crop
I'm saying I love the idea in principle, but in practice I really don't think this current crop of hyper-polarized sour-grapers can pull it off. If we can get the US a Republican Party that's mature enough to, oh, I don't know, stop claiming the president-elect is simultaneously a Muslim, a communist and the next Adolf Fucking Hitler, then it'll be something that benefits the country (even if they were in office in the future, provided the Democrats used it).

That's a big damn if, though, which makes me sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deport his ass. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. I wish all of the Bushes would do us a favor and
jump out of a mile-high airplane, sans parachutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. They already have it
All the so-called right-wing 'institutes' that the Pukes retreat to and sally forth to spew on C-Span and Fox at a moments notice are a shadow government, with a ready agenda they put n place the moment they can seize power. They are populated by the Boltons and Kristols of this country.

But, it's too late for the 'old white guy party'. Demographics are against the Pukes staying as a national party without a major restructuring away from the racist, dog-whistle rhetoric that they have used to stay in power.

But they just won't do it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. "Demographics are against the Pukes." That's why he's got the "little browns ones"
on the assembly line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. Jebbie needs to shut his big fat pie-hole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. To "avoid becoming the Old White Guy Party"?
Too late.

Jeb's fantasizing, dreaming of some new PR offensive that will sell their pile of Fail to an increasingly skeptical public. If he wants change, his beloved party will have to become something other than the Old White Guy Party that it has been for decades.

Note that Jeb doesn't have any answers, either. He's tied to ideology, as are all the rest. They're not going to change until whoring for money stops working altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yes Shadow Govt.
Those are well chosen words by the brother of the most secretive President ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. They don't get it
Even if they have a shadow government to oppose abortion rights, and get worked up over the next Terry Shiavo and Elian Gonzales, they can't just decide to provide the public with a loftier debate about policy because they don't have any policy ideas that work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. You go talk to Sarah about it, Jebbie.
She is the new leadership of the GOP, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. She is their distraction. While everyone is watching the Palin circus, Jeb will be stealing your wa
llet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. When he jumps out of the plane I hope there is a hippie w a backpack on the plane.
Let me know if you are not familiar with the old joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
32. Form a shadow government to continue recommending the fabulous policies
that have brought our whole country (and the world) to disaster?

Stuff it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. What an insufferable douchebag. Like he hasn't had "a really privileged life."
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 03:26 PM by smoogatz
He pretty much announced his intention to run in 2012. Good luck with that, asshole.

On edit: as far as the "shadow government" remark is concerned, it's nothing new. There's been the fundamental threat--and at times the reality--of a rightwing coup in place in every Democratic administration since 1932.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
36. "...avoid becoming the 'old white guy party'..."
:rofl: Bit late, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
39. what snakes they all are.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. THIS IS ALWAYS THE REPUBLISCUMS ATTITUDE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
42. Jeb Bush die and go to Hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
43. What a brazen bastard! They sure aren't hiding their criminal behavior anymore are they?
Guess the 700 Billion bailout showed the BFEE that they can get away with anything and no one will do a damn thing. :argh: :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. GOP=Grand Old Patriarchy ...corporate, sexist, racist, homophobic ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
47. Cmon Jebbie!
The GOP always works well in the shadows. Make that ONLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
48. The Republican Party could not engage discussion on the issues
when they were in the White House. Do they think they can learn to do that now?

Republicans won their elections not on real issues but on phantom issues like abortion, gay marriage and scaring people by exaggerating the terrorism threat. Those issues have been eclipsed by economic issues and, let's face it, if the Republicans had an answer to the economic problems of our country, they problems would not exist. The Republicans caused our economic problems. Their opinions about how to solve them are irrelevant at this point. Republicans have nothing to contribute right now. They need to shut up and watch and learn before they start talking about issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
49. It'll Be jeb in 2012
Mark it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCappedBandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
51. avoid becoming “the old white-guy party,”
Yep. Too late. Definitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
55. maybe he should work on questioning his criminal sibling first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
56. what? isn't one 'shadow govt' enuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
57. I thought that they already had one called the CIA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
58. I sincerely hope Poppy does jump out of a plane
un-parashooted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
59. How very American and patriotic of him.
:sarcasm:

I thought there already was a neo-con shadow government in place, "The Project For A New American Century" of which Jeb is a charter member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
66. Treason....... we must take down the cabal on January 21st.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
67. Well Well WELL, the Bushies have been known for a Shadow Government for Generations
Starting with Great Grandpa Walker, Grandpa Prescott, Poppy and now the Boys GW and Jebbie.

It seems as though they can now just come right out and make that statement public.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
69. Is this a damn confession?
That man is a menace--to Sarah Palin's ambitions particularly. WOW. Positioning himself for his own presiduncy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
70. My, how clever you are, Jeb. Pretending we don't have a military-industrial complex already.
I almost fell for it, really.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
74. Convenient! They already have one in place
with the 'undisclosed location' as the current headquarters. the bu$h bros both are shit personified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
75. Out of the sunlight
should be popular with cockroaches and some types of mold.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
79. Jeb's Keyword Hijacking
Jeb is taking the phrase "Shadow Government" and obfuscating its CIA/NSA meaning.

In a wilderness of mirrors, to me, that's indirect evidence that the real Shadow Government is on the defensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
81. Joe the Plumber
and Sara P fans don't do "loftier debates". The notion might amuse a few neo-con authors, but it will not take the Limbaugh fans anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
83. Fuck that pig-faced bastard......
:argh:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
84. I'd like to know what JEB and his Real Estate Buddies made on the Offshore Oil Swaps in Fla?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC