Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If the goal of the bailout was to allow people to take loans, why didn't the goverment just lend...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:11 PM
Original message
If the goal of the bailout was to allow people to take loans, why didn't the goverment just lend...
the money directly and cut out the middle man?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was to unfreeze credit markets. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because then the fat cats at AIG and others couldn't continue to party
And they might not have been able to get their obscene bonus checks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. How can we trust you with your money?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because postal workers are not presently trained to be loan officers
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 02:16 PM by HamdenRice
It's kind of like asking, if the government is going to take over the health care system, why not fire all the existing doctors, nurses and dentists and provide health care itself.

The banks already have branches and loan officers. How long do you think it would take to train all those post office workers (the post office being the only federal offices in virtually every community) to become loan officers?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. well they are laying of 40,000 postal employees
Retraining them for finance would be far better than putting them in the unemployment line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wouldn't it be better to have them, like, continue as postal workers?
Are you prepared to have your local letter carriers also carry out gall bladder surgery?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It certainly would.
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 04:06 PM by pending
But thats not what is going to happen. No, they will be unemployed in a few weeks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You a postal worker? I am married to one and it is not a matter of weeks
they are juggling many things right now to reduce that pain and YES I saw the story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. contractor
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 05:30 PM by pending
I don't know when exactly the layoffs hit. Being a contractor, they don't really tell me much. Pretty much everything I know about this layoff I've learned from the news.

I had hoped to be hired permanent, but that looks pretty unlikely now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nothing goes from the government to the people (including soldiers)
Without their favorite corporate crooks taking their cut first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elifino Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think government officials are looking out for them selfs
Protecting their investments and their benefactors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. It was to unfreeze credit markets and the feds are currently BUYING commercial paper
essentially cutting the middle man... like... like... like the Great Depression
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC