|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Phred42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 04:59 PM Original message |
Red State Socialism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dervish (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. wow! very informative! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. what's the story in New Mexico? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Betsy Ross (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. New Mexico has a very large population of poor people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-31-08 06:31 AM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Los Alamos National Labs, Sandia, White Sands Missile Range, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. I figured my state of Mississippi was near the bottom. We can beat New Mexico next time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Oh, man, now I'm pissed off! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
6. Very Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. This is pure gold! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. a very stupid and divisive table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. The red/blue appears to be determined by which presidential candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 06:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. that's why it's a stupid definition though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. It should be updated after this election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Federal revenue sharing is also NOT socialism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. it is an example though of using their definition of socialism against them n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Unfortunately, all it does is further legitimize their ignorance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-31-08 06:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. A flow of monies in one direction isn't "sharing". nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
9. “We’re set up, unlike other states in the union...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. Ah yes. I remember that this information was also posted during |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chollybocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-30-08 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
12. Alaska at #3?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-31-08 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
19. This is a direct result of the UNDEMOCRATIC nature of the US Congress. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-31-08 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
20. So, red states have better lobbyists and congressmen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-31-08 06:37 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. No, they have more Senators per person, since there is no proportional representation in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC