I wrote a little something in the hopes we might be able to use it in reply to some of the fearmail we get from GOPhers in our email groups.
Alter it as you see fit.
"... {I}mmediately and personally repudiate these outrageous and divisive comments."This was Arizona Senator John McCain's
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/mccain-offended.html">response to Georgia Congressman John Lewis, who said the GOP ticket was:
"...sowing the seeds of hatred and division..."
Lewis made his comments after videotaped recordings made of rallies for both GOP presidential candidate McCain and his running mate Alaska governor Sarah Palin showed supporters shouting incendiary comments such as "off with his head" and "kill him" whenever their Democratic opponent Barack Obama's name was mentioned.
Accusations of "playing the race card" by the McCain campaign against Obama and demands that Obama condemn Lewis' comments followed proclamations of "shock" by McCain, who dismissed Lewis' comments as "...brazen and baseless attack{s} on my character and the character of the thousands of hardworking Americans..."
What is important to note is that at no point did McCain condemn
behavior. He was specifically talking about how insulted
he was that someone would accuse him of racism.
McCain's racismIrwin Tang is the author of a book called
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Gook/Iwin-A-Tang/e/9780967943343/?itm=1">"Gook: John McCain's Racism and Why It Matters."
Tang begins a short
internet video about his book with a famous quote that summarizes McCain's feeling towards people he characterizes as "gooks,"
Tang explains the connection between the word "gook" and military aggression, saying,
".. most veterans when they came back to the United States they don't use the word 'gook' in public, much less in the mass media. They understand that it's a racist term. It's a term that you use toward people you're willing to kill."
Tang argues that several subsequent comments made by McCain show a willingness to dehumanize people.
Certainly, hatred of one group does not necessarily translate to hatred of another. However, McCain's use of the word "gook" shows that he does understand the power of hateful language.
Hate and ViolenceOn Wednesday October 18, 2008 a 58-year-old Obama volunteer was attacked by a homeowner.
Nancy Takehara was canvassing neighborhoods in Caledonia, Wisconsin, when she came to Ronald Goetsch's house.
Takehara told reporters that Goetsch was
"... telling us we’re not his people, we’re probably with ACORN, and he started screaming and raving ... He grabbed me by the back of the neck. I thought he was going to rip my hair out of my head. He was pounding on my head and screaming."
--
WISN ABC Channel 12, Milwaukee, WisconsinWe may never know what prompted Mr. Groetsch's response, but something set him off, causing him to reach first for outrage and violence against a woman he had never met before, yet believed he already knew something about.
Hate Isn't EverywhereIn 1865, in a small village in Virginia, Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered to Union General Ulysses S. Grant.
The men agreed to the terms of Lee's surrender which included allowed the former Confederate soldiers to keep their horses and mules and for them to receive food rations.
After 4 years and more than one million killed and wounded, Grant described the meeting that would eventually end the American Civil War,
"I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse."
--
PBSLike Grant and Lee, we conservatives and we liberals have different "causes" for which we would valiantly fight. But,
unlike Grant and Lee,
we are not at war. We Americans are conducting an election that will decide who will lead our nation for the next four years. This orderly transfer of power is something we've been able to do for over 200 years both in peacetime and in war.
But we--we Americans--are not at war with each other. There is no civil war here.
We are one country, not of men or of personalities, parties or ideologies, but of one set of laws. Our Constitution provides the same protections for every citizen regardless who he or she votes for and even if they choose not to vote at all.
We can ignore rumors and calls for divisiveness and fear. We can respect each other's differences without dissolving all that we have in common.
We can agree to disagree without hating one another. We Americans are not at war with each other.
As a nation we should be ashamed if we have to relearn this lesson. We are better than this.