From a friend:
Many of you have written me asking my perspective on the South Ossetian situation, especially since I'm living in Russia at the moment. While I feel that there is no simple solution to this problem, I am 100% convinced that the way that the conflict is being portrayed right now in Western news outlets is completely and unfairly biased against the Russian position (on a number of fronts), and I can assure you is only further enraging Russian public opinion against the west and making it harden it's position on a number of issues (and from my point of view, understandably so). The Poles signing the missile deal one day after this whole conflict boiled over was not exactly the best way to convince Russia that the missile stations that are being set up in Europe were aimed at rogue countries like Iran and North Korea and not against Russia (the former which had been the US's justification up until now for wanting the missile stations to begin with, and the latter being the reason that Russia up until now was opposed to such a missile system). It was also not the best way to convince the Russians that NATO expansion actually is not a plot by the US and western governments to encircle Russia.
One other thing that I just wanted to comment about on the whole Georgian conflict which no one is talking about: the key role of the US Ambassador in Georgia prior to the outbreak of hostilities.
In 1990, the US ambassador to Iraq was a woman named April Glaspie. It is known fact (not rumor) that prior to invading Kuwait (literally days before the invasion was launched), Saddam Hussein met with Glaspie in Baghdad:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_GlaspieWhat happened during that meeting is not known exactly (or if it is, it has already been classified and will not see the light of day in our lifetime), but both Saddam and several sources in the State Department anonymously said that during that meeting Saddam discussed invading Kuwait and that Glaspie gave the "green light". Subsequently, Glaspie was removed from her post, the whole issue was hushed up (aside from a couple of isolated articles that came out afterwards), and the Gulf War subsequently happened and the rest you know.
I bring this up because the way this whole thing in Georgia unfolded makes me very, very suspicious of the role of the US Ambassador in Georgia. I just cannot believe that Georgia would start bombing South Osettia (which they did; not even Western outlets deny that Georgia began this war; they only decide to apportion overall blame for the war and resulting casualties, again unfairly in my opinion, to Russia). I just cannot belive that without him giving the "green light" that this whole thing would have happened to begin with.
Yet no one, and I mean no one, is even talking about this. This would be my first avenue of inquiry if I was an investigative reporter into this whole affair. Something definitely stinks, although as far as I can tell, no one seems to care.
Below you will see a link to a clip (in English) that is very popular amongst Russians at the moment. The clip in their minds is one of countless examples of how western news media outlets are completely biased against Russia in this situation and have no interest in portraying news in an objective fashion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8XI2Chc6uQ