|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
| deminks
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:33 PM Original message |
| Officials: Sorority obsession seen in anthrax case |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| librechik
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. so he sent the anthrax to Leahy because ...? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alcibiades_mystery
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. LOL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spanone
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. so now we're getting the 'he was a pervert too' story??? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alcibiades_mystery
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. It's always the fallback when "He was a quiet sociopath" makes no sense at all |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mrreowwr_kittty
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. Beat me to it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 10. "Despite the connection" -- did you notice that? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spanone
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 22. correct and the only connection is 'what????' this is a stinky fish |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BeHereNow
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 25. Just like they tried to smear Scott Ritter- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 26. This makes me so angry for his family. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alcibiades_mystery
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. He thought he was sending congressional anthrax to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mrreowwr_kittty
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. So the guy's a creepy misogynist in addition to being an operative for the neocons? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 9. We don't know that he was their operative at all. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mrreowwr_kittty
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 11. Also possible. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 15. I found his letters. They're more thoughtful than crazy or rw. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Julius Civitatus
|
Mon Aug-04-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 34. What "crazy RW letters"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Julius Civitatus
|
Mon Aug-04-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 37. His letters make him seem reasonable, almost liberal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| deminks
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. Classic Bushco, throw everything out there and see what sticks. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 16. If this fails, next we'll hear he was a crack addict |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Wickerman
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 14. A greedy bastard who drove an aging van |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Canuckistanian
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 18. That was my first thought |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Virginia Dare
|
Mon Aug-04-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 30. Sounds like John Hinckley Jr doesn't it?...n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| maxsolomon
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. i wouldn't say i was "obsessed" with Kappas |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wuushew
|
Mon Aug-04-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. If you drive for seven hours in most cars don't you need to fill up at least once? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KharmaTrain
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 19. I Asked That Question, Too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spanone
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 23. it's all bunk imho |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| librechik
|
Mon Aug-04-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 29. FBI says no evidence he was there |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| suffragette
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. "e-mails or other documents" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| autorank
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. And what might this mean... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Iris
|
Mon Aug-04-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 38. "OK, what else was there" - good question since sorority houses don't tend to stand alone |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Supersedeas
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. at what point should it be blatantly obvious to Journalist with integrity (are there any left), that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 27. It may be that Ivins was guilty as sin but I haven't seen a shred |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Supersedeas
|
Mon Aug-04-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 33. It would be interesting to get Hatfill's response to Ivin's 'investigation'--more Media incurosity |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. It is so sad, Cheney's FBI now kills people and then invents a lame story. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TexasObserver
|
Mon Aug-04-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. that's a real eye roller |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Julius Civitatus
|
Mon Aug-04-08 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. "Multiple U.S. officials"? More anonymous sources? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| screembloodymurder
|
Mon Aug-04-08 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. Kappa Kappa Gamma ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Supersedeas
|
Mon Aug-04-08 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. so, is Mukasey still in charge of what the DoJ leaks?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Marie26
|
Mon Aug-04-08 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. Makes no sense at all |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 19th 2013, 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC