Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nancy Pelosi: Bush Drilling Proposal is a Hoax Unworthy of Serious Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 04:59 PM
Original message
Nancy Pelosi: Bush Drilling Proposal is a Hoax Unworthy of Serious Debate
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-nancy-pelosi/bush-drilling-proposal-is_b_115922.html

Bush Drilling Proposal is a Hoax Unworthy of Serious Debate
Posted July 30, 2008 | 03:50 PM (EST)


The president knows, as his own administration has stated, that the impact of any new drilling will be insignificant -- promising savings of only pennies per gallon many years down the road. Americans know that thanks to the two oilmen in the White House, consumers are now paying $4 a gallon for gas. But what Americans should realize is that what the president is calling for is drilling as close as three miles off of America's pristine beaches and in other protected areas.

The president has failed in his economic policy, and now he wants to say, 'but for drilling in protected areas offshore, our economy would be thriving and the price of gas would be lower.' That hoax is unworthy of the serious debate we must have to relieve the pain of consumers at the pump and to promote energy independence.

Today, the New Direction Congress will vote on legislation to bring down gas prices by taking crucial steps to curb excessive speculation in the energy futures market. The president himself could lower prices by drawing down a small portion of our government oil stockpile, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The New Direction Congress will continue to bring forth responsible proposals to increase supply, reduce prices, protect consumers, and transition America to a clean, renewable energy independent future.

This post was first published on the Speaker's blog, The Gavel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep - it's a grab for future profits because Americans are scared...
Oil companies have 68 million acres they could drill on if they wanted to ~ and yet all they do is close refineries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Talk about the pot calling the kettle unworthy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. trof: Pelosi is a Hoax Unworthy of Serious Debate
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. At present I think
Britney Spears has got more credibility than Mrs Facelift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Huh--just like impeachment--what CAN we talk about, Nancy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. my money says she passes whatever he asks of Congress. Thank you sir can I have another
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's just foreplay...
...prior to Ms. Nancy bending over in any direction Bushie desires so he can screw us all again by proxy. So much for a new direction in consensual congress.

Is it possible to have zero credibility and still keep falling all the way into negative numbers? If so, she'll figure out a way in what I sincerely hope are the final months of her embarrassing and content-free term as Madam Squeaker.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC