|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
notfullofit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-05-08 10:08 PM Original message |
Feds going after Rep. Conyers wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-05-08 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. Agreed, it looks like a witch hunt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 06:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. maybe it'll piss John off enough to start doing something about these crooks in our White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-05-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. I wonder what Mr. Conyers is doing that triggered this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-05-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. They Want to Make Sure Impeachment STAYS Off the Table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-05-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. it's a message to any upstart even thinking about it too n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notfullofit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 12:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. You got that right, retaliation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluesmail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-05-08 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. Give me a break. This is so obvious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-05-08 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
6. While I am sympathetic towards the view that this is a railroad smear ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-05-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. First of all, don't believe it. Second, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Smells faintly of the Siegelman prosecution-who needs facts with this Administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 06:31 AM Response to Original message |
9. Was there a FISA warrant for that wiretap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notfullofit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. You are right, such irony! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
10. I can't WAIT for the next Democratic Attorney General |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. "electronic surveillance evidence"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
15. Detroit politics ain't pretty. Let's let this play out; can't call it a "witch hunt" just yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Yes, I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. You're saying what I didn't. But I agree. Monica is questionable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. She doesn't resemble the same woman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Michigan-Arizona (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 07:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Detroit Mayor Archer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
16. Another reason to say no to this amended Fisa bill. Lieave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
17. Now matter how this turns out, I can only say that politics is a dirty business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
18. And this is what the warrantless wiretapping program was all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
19. A witch hunt and a warning to others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
20. you got to figure if you're investigating bu$hco, bu$hco is investigating you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
21. Vague claims. Anonymous sources. Welcome to "Republican Dirty Tricks 2008" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
25. Well, that explains why Conyers has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-06-08 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
26. Ironic that she's accused of impropriety regarding a "sludge contract" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
27. "...have electronic surveillance evidence..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 22nd 2024, 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC