Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress finds Big Oil holding back fields that could DOUBLE US output

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:41 PM
Original message
Congress finds Big Oil holding back fields that could DOUBLE US output
Rush Limbaugh and other right wing commentators have blamed high oil prices on limits on off-shore drilling near the US and in ANWR, but what makes people think big oil will pump more if we give them more oil fields?

Right now, they hold leases to federal land that they AREN'T DRILLING ON that could DOUBLE US oil output according to the House Committee on Natural Resources. They have introduced a bill to make them use those fields or lose them:

Washington, D.C. - In an effort to compel oil and gas companies to produce on the 68 million acres of federal lands, both onshore and offshore, that are leased but sitting idle, House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick J. Rahall (D-WV) today introduced legislation that gives Big Oil one option - either "use it or lose it."

The 68 million acres of leased but inactive federal land have the potential to produce an additional 4.8 million barrels of oil and 44.7 billion cubic feet of natural gas each day. This would nearly double total U.S. oil production, and increase natural gas production by 75 percent. It would also cut U.S. oil imports by more than one-third, reducing America's dependency on foreign oil.

The Rahall bill would force oil and gas companies to either produce or give up federal onshore and offshore leases they are stockpiling by barring the companies from obtaining any more leases unless they can demonstrate that they are producing oil and gas, or are diligently developing the leases they already hold, during the initial term of the leases.


If they didn't charge us less for giving them Iraq, why would they for ANWR?

Link to entire blog post: http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2008/06/big-oil-holding-back-fields-that-could.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course they don't want to increase supply. It's not a competitive market.
There is collusion among the small number of players in the market. No one has incentive to increase supply in order to get greater market share. They are more than happy to take their share of the pie at current profit margins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. All the production in the world will not make up for the refinery capacity they shut down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. reserves are at a 15 yr high, last summer truckers were saying they were turned away at the Western
Hub.. couldn't off load another truck load while the media was saying the raising of the price of oil was due to shortages.. they were posting here

http://www.redorbit.com/news/business/1083991/hub_of_activity_cushing_interchange_oil_levels_can_affect_futures/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. they have been drilling and capping for decades.. lots of oil, and 60% price is speculation..
we have oil riggers on both sides of the family.. drilling and capping today, got uncles drilled and capped 30 years, all over, WA to the east coast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. What about the King Abdullah philosophy
when he restricted new drilling so future generations would have resources? More just isn't the answer. Last night I was watching the clips of the man who proclaimed that America was 'addicted' to oil, sounding very much like a pimp who know just wants us to have another fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC