|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:29 PM Original message |
Is it time to increase the size of the Supreme Court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. We need to do something to end the embarrassment of this Supreme Court . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think we could use another 4 justices. Maybe Gore Nader Edwards and a heartburn to be named later |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. if mccain gets his hands on it, the next president/congress will have to add A LOT of new seats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadmessengers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
4. That didn't work out too well last time someone tried it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I came here to say this. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. He tried to raise it to 15. And he got re-elected two more times after that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadmessengers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. He tried, but failed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. There was quite a ruckus about the proposal, but it did let the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadmessengers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Especially when you consider that Hoover ran again for the nomination in 1940 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. IIRC, the reason for FDR's blowback was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. It worked out extremely well for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. It also has the benefit of being Constitutional, unlike *'s power grabs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 03:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
25. He saved Social Security by the "packing the court" pressure he put on them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Daniels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. So I guess you'll be in favor of increasing the size as well if McCain wins? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Of course I fucking won't be in favor of that. What's your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. Just the opposite, cut back and do it based on senority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Or, we could just impeach the four motherfuckers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old guy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
12. Don't know about increasing the size, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I think the original idea was to keep somebody from skewing the entire court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
13. No, it's time to impeach the bastards on the Court that keep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. That'll work, too. However... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. I say go with lucky 13 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. 13 is a good number. Let the "Fascist Four" get used to writing dissents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I'll go with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
morningglory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
24. No! Feb. 09 would be the time to do that. Good idea! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
26. We should have at least 15.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC