|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:32 PM Original message |
Oh, This is going to get Interesting!! (Canned Prosecutors Want to Talk) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. It has all the same ingredients as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
35. One big difference... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtimecanuk (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. How would Congress/Senate get rid of Gonzales? Would they have... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
23. I think he would need impeachment. . . .n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 07:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. But they DON'T need a supermajority to convict in the Senate in his case! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. I did not know that! What are we waiting for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. Very interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. More here on who may have been behind it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 02:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
43. Indeed! Thanks for this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. Here we go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. Kick for justice! ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. Looks promising |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
9. Crank up the printer and get the subpoenas to all of them!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
11. Great news! K&R! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sadie4629 (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. I guess I thought firing them was no big deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 06:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Why don't you google it, then let us know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sadie4629 (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I just tried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I just did and found numerous articles... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Not a valid comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. APPROVED BY THE SENATE. as opposed to not sent to the senate because of a new law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. That's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
27. I take your point. Was there a round of firings of Clintonistas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. All of Clinton's US attorneys resigned, and Bush appointed new ones. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 12:49 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. yes these people being fired were appointed by bush. (Not 100% certain of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 06:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Here, you missed this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
13. I smell a Constitutional Crisis in the making! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PhilipShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 08:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
30. Politicians shuffling papers during a Constitutional Crisis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
18. !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
19. Start with the one from the Northern Marianas Islands... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. So right, start at the beginning, Conyers on Frederick A. Black. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
22. I wonder if David Iglesias has already told Schumer and Feinstein which repuke Congressmen called |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
24. do it! do it Schumer! do it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. I don't think that Schumer can just do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
29. Do it. Then subpoena the AG. Then indict and convict. That is all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-28-07 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
34. K and R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
37. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
38. Why bother? It's all off the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 01:20 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. A table is a dynamic space. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 02:35 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. LOL!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 02:42 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Maybe you just have to have set enough tables to get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 02:49 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Check out this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 02:59 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. But the Dems will run from the red! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 03:58 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Luv it!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 10:20 AM Response to Reply #46 |
50. It's called "Bottleneck". I found some that were goodlooking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 02:31 AM Response to Original message |
40. CSPAN!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
47. Kicking for vote on issuing subpoenas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
48. Subpoena Like A Sonofabitch I Say! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
49. Nice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IWantAChange (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
51. Isn't this a result of that great defender of the Constitution Spector's amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-01-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
52. They won't be able to cut the vocal chords of those attorneys, as if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC