Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boston-Area Shooting Called 'Work-Related'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:22 PM
Original message
Boston-Area Shooting Called 'Work-Related'
Police arrested a 42-year-old employee of an Internet consulting firm in suburban Boston today after he allegedly opened fire and killed at least seven co-workers.

Police said they arrested Michael McDermott, an employee of Edgewater Technology (EDGW) , who was armed with an assault rifle, a shotgun and a semi-automatic handgun when they found him in the lobby of the office in Wakefield, Mass., according to Reuters news service.


McDermott faces charges for seven counts of murder, according to the report.

http://www.vault.com/nr/newsmain.jsp?nr_page=3&ch_id=402&article_id=1955267&cat_id=2091

Yes... let's let folks bring their guns with them to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. can't wait for the "..if someone there would have had a gun on them...
this wouldn't have ended up with seven dead."

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. This happened EIGHT YEARS AGO. It isn't NEWS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. really... try dismissing the point
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 03:56 PM by fascisthunter
ya can't...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. What point? HEY, news flash!!! LINCOLN ASSASSINATED AT FORD'S THEATER!!
If you actually think that knowingly posting ancient news stories without any acknowledgment that they ARE ancient news stories is clever, there's a term for that kind of behavior. If you fucked up, say so and move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. you obviously have a personal problem
You could have tried to address the content of the article without getting personal, so either my point pisses you off or you are the one with a personal axe to grind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I am familiar with this ancient story, because it happened in my state.
Your post appeared intended to "fool" people.

There's a word for that, and it isn't a 'personal problem.' You seem to like that word, don't you? Three times in two sentences!

That's what it looks like you have, frankly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. My Post wasn't intended to "fool" anybody and I'd Appreciate it If
you stopped trying to mischaracterize my intent. Don't you have other people to ridicule and personally attack? Seems it's all you do on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. If your "intent" had been clear, there wouldn't have been any issue.
I'm not the only one on this shitty thread who pointed out that your "news" was old.

And you didn't make any appreciable point, either.

But do go on with your bad self, and your favorite word.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. You are Trying to Get my Thread Locked by Baiting me
I've alerted on you.

If I wanted to make this thread appear as if it were new, I would have placed in Breaking News, which I didn't. You are way off base as are most of your posts on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I am not "baiting" you. You are "baiting' me, and anyone else who pointed out
to you that the story was old and you did not explain yourself.

You have both a pot AND a kettle, I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. It's all here for the mods to read.
You accused me of something I wasn't doing and you personally attacked me while doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Yes, it is. And I hope they do read it.
It's obvious what you are doing.

The 'why' is another story....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. As You Stated Before... you are wasting your time
so maybe you should move on. You are actually the first person I have ever placed on ignore, because you do have a personal axe to grind with me, and it probably has nothing to do with the content of the article I posted or the point I made at the end of it. You are deliberately mischaracterizing my intent...

Buh bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Buh bye! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh, that's an ANCIENT STORY from the DARK ages. Probably why your source is called the VAULT.
That happened before nahn wun wun changed ever-thang.

Note the DATE: http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={435DD8FD-409D-49D9-946D-F5411DC00628}

Possible tax link in office slaughter
Officials say IRS wanted suspect's wages garnished
By Ted Griffith, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last update: 4:37 p.m. EST

Dec. 27, 2000



WAKEFIELD, Mass. (CBS.MW) -- The gunman who allegedly killed seven coworkers Tuesday morning at a suburban Boston Internet consultant was ordered held without bail Wednesday.
Michael McDermott, a 42-year-old employee of Edgewater Technology, pleaded not guilty to seven counts of murder. Investigators suspect McDermott's anger about an IRS order to garnish his wages prompted the massacre on the day after Christmas, according to news accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. This happened several years ago
I live in MA, and it was all over the news. McDermott has been in jail for at least a couple of years by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You could dig up lots of old crimes to make your point
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 03:32 PM by rox63
What's relevant is what's going on now. You made it sound like it was a new story, which it's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ok Here ya Go:
Suspect in workplace shooting to be arraigned Wednesday
Tuesday, April 10, 2007

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070410/METRO/704100358

is that relevent enough for ya...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. So why didn't you post THAT story? Trying to be 'cool' and 'oblique' eh?
It's not working. You come off as either uninformed, or deliberately yanking people's chains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Because It Still Made the Point I Wanted to Make
and you obviously understood enough to "nitpick". Don't make this personal... as you often do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. No, it didn't. The point it made, to ME, was that you posted an old story.
I don't "make things personal." You have perception issues. And you make things more difficult than they need to be, for whatever reason.

And you've wasted enough of my time.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. You Keep Distracting from my intent...
You wasted your own time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's Another More Recent:
Workplace Shooting at Calif. Postal Facility Leaves 7 Dead
http://www.securityinfowatch.com/online/Government--and--Public-Buildings/Workplace-Shooting-at-Calif.-Postal-Facility-Leaves-7-Dead/7169SIW349


I'm sure there are many more... want more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wow. I initially was going to say, "what are the odds
that the same company that Mucko shot up, was shot up again.. by Mucko himself."

You could have at least included the graphics from back then that showed his path and the bodies of the dead. It even included the survivors and where they were hiding under their desks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Really.. Could I Have.. wow, Thanks Man
The National Institute For The Prevention Of Workplace Violence
http://www.workplaceviolence911.com/Articles/articles.jsp?listType=1015
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. ...
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 03:46 PM by devilgrrl
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. ...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think we can all agree that workplace violence is bad
And workplace mass-murders are even more bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Thank You... That's all I'm Pointing Out
but it seems my posting this really pisses off enough folks to get personal with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. In a state that prohibits you from locking a gun in your car while you are at work...
And your point is?

If you are casting aspersions on the proposed Florida law to prohibit employer searches of employee-owned cars for lawfully possessed firearms locked inside the vehicle in public parking lots, methinks this provides more counterexample than support.

The idea that a person planning a mass murder would be dissuaded by a company policy that says no guns may be stored in locked cars in the parking lot is rather naive...

FWIW, the recent guns-in-cars issue started with Weyerhauser's firing of a bunch of employees who had firearms locked in their cars on the first day of hunting season. Anyone who refused a search of their car, or who had a gun in the car, was fired on the spot. That is just wrong, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. My Point... More Accesibility to Guns
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 04:28 PM by fascisthunter
will lead to more violence. Further deregulation of guns is bad for society.... not good. And it's not even necessary which is what makes this issue even more tragic. That's my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Criminals use 'throw aways' not legal guns. Crazy people use legal guns.
And MA makes guns in Springfield, last I checked!

I'm sure there is a black market going on somewhere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. And More Accesibility Make Guns more Accessable
There is no reason one needs to bring a gun with them to work. None....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Well, I'm sure there are jobs that require it but that guy was nutz...
completely insane. That's the difference, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. That's True... he Was Nuts
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 04:43 PM by fascisthunter
And I can even see folks who are going on a hunt after work getting a permit to carry their guns in their vehicles to work. I just don't see why we should just make it legal to bring guns to work without getting a permit. I believe in regulation... as I have seen enough gun violence, especially in the city. Regulation does work....

I do however see how it's much more acceptible to be able to bring guns with you too work in areas around the country where hunting is done frequently. This issue is probably much more relevent depending on where you live...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. You DO have to have a permit to carry a concealed weapon in Massachusetts!!
No permit and you go to jail for a year, no exceptions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Yes.... and That's a Good Thing
I'm refering to the ruling in Florida...

I was posting about the incident not necessarily about Massachusetts and it's own laws. I don't want to see the type of deregulation happen in my state...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:56 PM
Original message
Umm..then why are you posting a story from Bos. 8 yrs. old?
I'm sorry but you're not making any sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
49. Because It Shows Gun Violence at a Work Place
Allowing folks to brings guns with them everywhere including work means we will see more not less incidents like this one. The story being 8 years old is irrelevent to my point. I also linked to a case much more recent... but I really didn't feel I needed to.

After all, it wasn't posted in Breaking News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. What WOULD be relevant would be a story like this from Florida!
;)

And you didn't mention in your OP (original post) that this had anything to do with Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Just Got Back Home... I Didn't Have to Mention What State:
But for further clarity I probably should have linked to the article talking about the ruling made in Florida. What state this was in or what date the article was written is irrelevant to the point I was making and here is the exact quote: "Yes... let's let folks bring their guns with them to work."

I'm sure if I looked enough, I probably could have found an article writing about a gun incident at a workplace somewhere in FL. My point would have been more poignant and relative to the Florida ruling itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. "Accessibility" to guns is a binary results set
It's either

1 - You can get a gun or
0 - You can't get one

If it's not 1 then it is 0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. I don't see anyone arguing for more accessibility.
What I see is an attempt by gun owners to retain the accessibility (for the law-abiding) that we have historically had. I am open to additional efforts to address criminal misuse, but Priority One for the gun-control lobby seems to be restrictions on lawful and responsible use, hence the emphasis on rifle bans, hassling of licensed CHL holders, and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. You Do Raise a Good and Valid Point about Law Abiding Folks
having their accessibility to their guns. I just think more accessibility like this will encourage more folks to bring their guns with them everywhere, setting up a very dangerous precedent in the future for those who do not or wish not to carry.

We already know more accesibility to guns leads to more incidents with guns, due unfortunately to human behavior. I do believe America has a problem with guns and making them more accesible is not going to make America more responsible. It's an issue that goes beyond guns, and until we deal with the other issues that create the incidences that I have linked to, we are going to see more, not less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. The law-abiding have always had that accessibility in most states.
It is only in the last few years that the gun-control lobby has been urging companies to enact "no guns in cars" policies enforced by searches, as a way to prevent licensed CHL holders from carrying before or after work, and a side effect is preventing someone from hunting or going to the range after work.

The Weyerhauser search was conducted on the first day of hunting season on purpose, IMO. Catching criminals certainly wasn't the motivation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Interesting... Thank You for That Info
That sheds a different light on the Florida ruling for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #29
57. "More accesibility to guns will lead to more violence." Support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. Why are you posting such an old story? He's already in prison!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
33. This is an Old Story But Should Make Folks Think about a Current Ruling
This thread was not intended to make people think this happened yesterday or today. As I have replied to someone else, I could have posted something more recent, but didn't because I felt the purpose of this thread would be self-explanatory as highlighting the fact that guns have been brought to work (illegally) and has ended in work place violence. I believe with the most recent ruling, this type of scenario will be more prevalent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. What ruling are you referring to?
Did someone successsfully sue an employer for a workplace policy that violated his or her Second Amendment rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. That One in Florida (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. That is a legislative proposal to preserve existing Florida rights
against recent moves by large corporations to institute search-cars-in-public-lots rules, a la the Weyerhauser case. This creates no new access; Florida law has always recognized the right to have a firearm secured in the car, as long as it is not on your person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Very Good.....
I still would rather see a public without as many guns. But the law is the law, and it's up to society to decide what is good for itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. Insufficient information
I am at work and don't have time to follow all the news all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
39. Funny how this kind of thing NEVER happens in a gun factory
Work-related indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Yeah... it is interesting
but the World isn't a "Gun Factory"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
42. Og hits several members of mammoth hunting party with big rock
I thought that I would also contribute a late breaking story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
58. WTF?
Guns kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC