Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former CIA No. 3 Official Foggo May Face New Corruption Charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 09:21 AM
Original message
Former CIA No. 3 Official Foggo May Face New Corruption Charges
Former Top CIA Official May Face New Charges In Corruption Case

ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- Prosecutors said Friday that they may obtain a new indictment next month against a former top CIA official accused of corruption, but that the core allegations will not change substantially.

Kyle "Dusty" Foggo has pleaded not guilty to the current charges, which include 30 counts of fraud, conspiracy and money laundering. Specifically, Foggo -- who as executive director held the CIA's No. 3 rank before leaving in 2006 -- is accused of accepting gifts from friend and defense contractor Brent Wilkes in return for help winning contracts.

Foggo was in court Friday for a status hearing, the first since his case was transferred to U.S. District Court in Alexandria from San Diego.
Click here to find out more!

Foggo's lawyers had requested the change, and prosecutors agreed to the transfer last month after saying they had uncovered additional charges that could only be brought in Virginia.

During Friday's hearing, prosecutor Phillip Halpern said that if a new indictment is obtained, it will likely come in April. He said the new indictment would be "essentially of the same nature," though it may include new charges of conflict of interest and making false statements and the conspiracy might be a bit broader.

more...

http://www.nbc4.com/news/15667159/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's get the show on the road! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And the Abramoff show, and the Rep. Lewis show, and the Doolittle show .....
And the Siegelman appeal .....Full Stall Justice, all-around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. How come all these amoral rat bastards have such cutesy nicknames?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Keeping the party going until the Statute of Limitations kick-in
of Foggo's attorneys can claim he didn't get a speedy trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That would engage a new criminal exposure, obstruction of justice, maybe conspiracy too.
Running out the statute of limitations to avert a prosecution might be hard to prove, but certainly not hard to interpret as criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It works in Italy
Silvio Berlusconi had convictions overturned or charges dropped using the tactic.


Watch Bush gang use the tactic too. It's especially effective if the prosecution is in on the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. They're going to (have to) find a way to drag this out past November.
Any testimony he might give now could be too damaging to the RNC, some (how many?) of the retiring (and not) congressional 'pukes and the WH.

Then again, it would be better for ol' Dusty to get the conviction out of the way quickly so * could pardon him before slinking out of the Wha' Hizzie next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here's San Diego Union Tribune's take on this story a day later... Timing of trial is curious!
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 03:11 AM by calipendence

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20080322-9999-1n22foggo.html

In this report they indicate that the trial date was set to November 3rd. That really seems very curiously timed closely to the election now doesn't it? Might they be trying to bury this news then?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC