|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 08:42 AM Original message |
investigation of the prostitution ring itself was triggered by an investigation of Spitzer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. You should see the propaganda mongers at work on cable news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 09:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Well, banks ARE required to report suspiscious activity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Anti-money laundering law is old news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. If they didn't get Spitzer EXACTLY when they did, NY State... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 08:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. IF this investigation BEGAN with illegal wiretaps of Spitzer, that's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 09:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. If you're a politician, KKKarl has an EXTENSIVE file on you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Who said anything about the wiretaps being illegal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 10:10 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. You misunderstood what I said. I, as well as several others, are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Your assumption is irrational. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
4. Sort of like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSPS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
7. That's an important distinction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC