Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Alan Dershowitz finally jumped the shark: Re: prostitution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:43 PM
Original message
Has Alan Dershowitz finally jumped the shark: Re: prostitution
He says that the reality is that everyone knows that prostitution in major cities is a common thing so this was a bogus charge against Spitzer. Misdemeanor at most. And when they asked him if Spitzer would prosecute himself if the shoe were on the other foot, he said that probably, which would reveal his hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Alan should really never talk extemporaneously
He becomes such a caricature of an over-educated, secular Jewish northeast intellectual when he does. Even when I find myself I'm agreeing with him, I think, wow...do I really want people to know that this is what I think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. he jumped the shark
when he defended US torturing potential terrorists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I don't recognize him anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. He got what he was advocating..
Legalized torture. I wonder what his position on steroids is. Crime and Punishment. What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. he may have violated state,federal ,and municipal laws.
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 04:48 PM by madrchsod
.. he`s hit the trifecta!

why is alan giving this scumbag a break?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. AD was his (young) prof at HARVARD LAW, is why. They go back a ways. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. ES was also his research assistant, too, so there's more than just a student-teacher connection. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, anything to get himself back in the spotlight n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, he made a legal analysis. AD will be around for awhile. He makes for interesting tee vee. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. He settles on some obscure point, and beats you down with his argument. Most people realize that the
world, and evidence gathering, is not perfect. But they also concede to his arguments, because, let's face it, he's a very unpleasant person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Spitzer wasn't running a whorehouse.
I really can't stand the distortions going on here and in the false noise machine. Spitzer prosecuted whorehouse operators while using a whorehouse himself. That makes him a fucking hypocrite, literally, but only a john and in general not the target of local, state, or federal prosecutions. The fact that we lock up the whores and leave the johns alone unless they are high ranking prostiticians is a whole other issue that can be readily resolved by leaving the whores alone too. Of course in our demented idiocracy the solution is generally to go after the johns, except that the police hate that because then they can't make their usual bonuses from the whorehouse operators.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Well, there's another reason why we want to keep politicians out of the
cathouse. So they don't become vulnerable to blackmail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. Some comedian this evening noted that he was CONNECTED TO A PROSTITUTION RING...by his PENIS!
Not sure who said that (Conan? Stewart? Colbert? Letterman?...but it was funny).

He was just a fucking CUSTOMER. Not a "ringleader" or an owner, just a lousy CLIENT.

Yes, he is a jerk, a hypocrite, an asshole, lacking in character, a disgrace to his family, a disappointment to those who know him, but this hyperbolic language, I agree with you, is ASININE.

It's a bit of the "protest too much" BS. Lacks sincerity, certainly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. laws are arbitrary
I've broken many a laws from speeding to jay walking. I've got no moral problem with prostitution between consenting adults. If I was his wife I'd care, but thats between them. For all I know she was cheating on him. If it was some minor or someone forced to against their will I'd have a problem. But shit he gave her some money to touch her no no spot with his pee pee, who cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Unsafe sex. They say he asked for unsafe sex.
Under normal circumstances, I would say, "Get a wife!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. unsafe omg terrorism!
who knows what he asked for, rumors rumors rumors. Raise the threat level to red!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. "No moral problem", yet you still refer to "her no no spot". More likely her ye$ ye$ spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. His analysis was interesting if not entirely convincing
I was waiting for him to defend his position that Spitzer was not guilty of the Structuring charge, but he didn't elaborate whatsoever. That is the only charge I think would stick. The notion Feds would prosecute him for the Mann Act is ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The man has too much money if he can arrange to fly in his poontag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Don't you think it's possible that he was trying to hide "large expenses"
from his wife? From what I understand, he was transferring smaller amounts of $$ from several of his different bank accounts to another account (of his I think). My guess would be that wifey didn't know anything about the account the $$ was tansferred into.

There's still way too much that the public doesn't know about what was really going on in this whole story. I really think we should all sit back and wait several days at least and see what else we hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I agree with you. There's more to this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wasn't there a guy who prosecuted himself for something?
just to be honest? Was it Spitzer? Fitzgerald?
does anyone remember who that was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
selador Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. he;s right
i've been saying the same thing.

the issue here is soliciting prostitution, a minor charge, that usually results in a fine at worse.

yes, TECHNICALLY, it's a mann act thing, and structuring as well, but the reality is - petty crime

however, the investigators had no idea what they were getting into when they started - they just had the anamolous transactions, the shell company, etc.

spitzer, like many prosecutors (the jack mccoy syndrome) probably would have made a lot of hue and cry about the mann act, etc. but anybody in law enforcement knows prostitution is dealt with as a nuisance crime. (many years in law enforcement myself).

the true money laundering and organized crime aspect is on the "sell side" so to speak - the escort service that RAN the pros's

but really, as i have said, he should take a 6 month probation and a fine, and have his record wiped upon completion of probabtion

that's how the real world handles solicitation of a prostitute.

dershowitz is pretty knowledgeable about these things. i had the pleasure to speak with him once about a law enforcement issue, and i found him to be pragmatic, knowledgeable, and reasonable


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC