Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Hedges: "The U.S. is arming, funding and equipping its own assassins. "

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rusty quoin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:19 PM
Original message
Chris Hedges: "The U.S. is arming, funding and equipping its own assassins. "
The Calm Before the Conflagration

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080225_the_calm_before_the_conflagration/

The United States is funding and in many cases arming the three ethnic factions in Iraq—the Kurds, the Shiites and the Sunni Arabs. These factions rule over partitioned patches of Iraqi territory and brutally purge rival ethnic groups from their midst. Iraq no longer exists as a unified state. It is a series of heavily armed fiefdoms run by thugs, gangs, militias, radical Islamists and warlords who are often paid wages of $300 a month by the U.S. military. Iraq is Yugoslavia before the storm. It is a caldron of weapons, lawlessness, hate and criminality that is destined to implode. And the current U.S. policy, born of desperation and defeat, means that when Iraq goes up, the U.S. military will have to scurry like rats for cover.

The supporters of the war, from the Bush White House to Sen. John McCain, tout the surge as the magic solution. But the surge, which primarily deployed 30,000 troops in and around Baghdad, did little to thwart the sectarian violence. The decline in attacks began only when we bought off the Sunni Arabs. U.S. commanders in the bleak fall of 2006 had little choice. It was that or defeat. The steady rise in U.S. casualties, the massive car bombs that tore apart city squares in Baghdad and left hundreds dead, the brutal ethnic cleansing that was creating independent ethnic enclaves beyond our control throughout Iraq, the death squads that carried out mass executions and a central government that was as corrupt as it was impotent signaled catastrophic failure.

The United States cut a deal with its Sunni Arab enemies. It would pay the former insurgents. It would allow them to arm and form military units and give them control of their ethnic enclaves. The Sunni Arabs, in exchange, would halt attacks on U.S. troops. The Sunni Arabs agreed.

The U.S. is currently spending hundreds of millions of dollars to pay the monthly salaries of some 600,000 armed fighters in the three rival ethnic camps in Iraq. These fighters—Shiite, Kurd and Sunni Arab—are not only antagonistic but deeply unreliable allies. The Sunni Arab militias have replaced central government officials, including police, and taken over local administration and security in the pockets of Iraq under their control. They have no loyalty outside of their own ethnic community. Once the money runs out, or once they feel strong enough to make a thrust for power, the civil war in Iraq will accelerate with deadly speed. The tactic of money-for-peace failed in Afghanistan. The U.S. doled out funds and weapons to tribal groups in Afghanistan to buy their loyalty, but when the payments and weapons shipments ceased, the tribal groups headed back into the embrace of the Taliban.

The Sunni Arab militias are known by a variety of names: the Iraqi Security Volunteers (ISVs), neighborhood watch groups, Concerned Local Citizens, Critical Infrastructure Security. The militias call themselves “sahwas" ("sahwa" being the Arabic word for awakening). There are now 80,000 militia fighters, nearly all Sunni Arabs, paid by the United States to control their squalid patches of Iraq. They are expected to reach 100,000. The Sunni Arab militias have more fighters under arms than the Shiite Mahdi Army and are about half the size of the feeble Iraqi army. The Sunni Awakening groups, which fly a yellow satin flag, are forming a political party.

The Sunni Arab militias, though they have ended attacks on U.S. forces, detest the Shiite-Kurdish government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and abhor the presence of U.S. troops on Iraqi soil. They take the money and the support with clenched teeth because with it they are able to build a renegade Sunni army, a third force inside Iraq, which they believe will make it possible to overthrow the central government. The Sunni Arabs, who make up about 40 percent of Iraq’s population, held most positions of power under Saddam Hussein. They dominated Iraq’s old officer corps. They made up its elite units, including the Republic Guard divisions and the Special Forces regiments. They controlled the intelligence agencies. There are several hundred thousand well-trained Sunni Arabs who lack only an organizational structure. We have now made the formation of this structure possible. These militias are the foundation for a deadlier insurgent force, one that will dwarf anything the United States faced in the past. The U.S. is arming, funding and equipping its own assassins.

There have been isolated clashes that point to a looming conflagration. A Shiite-dominated unit of the regular army in the late summer of 2007 attacked a strong Sunni Arab force west of Baghdad. U.S. troops thrust themselves between the two factions. The enraged Shiites, thwarted in their attack, kidnapped relatives of the commander of the Sunni Arab force, and American negotiators had to plead frantically for their release. There have been scattered incidents like this one throughout Iraq.

If the U.S. begins, as promised, to withdraw troops, it will be harder to keep these antagonistic factions apart. The cease-fire by the radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, extended a few days ago, could collapse. And if that happens, a civil war, unlike anything U.S. forces have experienced in Iraq, will begin. Such a conflagration, with the potential to draw in neighboring states and lead to the dismemberment of Iraq, would be the final chapter of the worst foreign policy blunder in American history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is news? The u.s. has been doing this for decades......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArfDogMNO Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Indeed, ALL world powers do this, and always have.
do readers here think China doesn't do this, the USSR/Russia didn't/doesn't do this, or that they are somehow nicer about it? Do readers think the european powers didn't do this in their day, or that Japan didn't do this prior to WWII? This is simply a reality of the human existence.

In the real world, Realpolitik is the only Law of nations, and nations that don't act in their own interests become less powerful as others absorb the power vacuum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. They've been doing this for decades. It's a core issue in IranContra, Iraqgate and BCCI.
Aren't we glad Bill decided for our country and our party that we should all just move past the crimes and illegal operations of BushInc and sided with their secrecy and privilege throughout the 90s?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. my favorite website...
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/
I think I've learned more there, than anywhere else on the net...in case anyone has yet to stumble upon it.
This is my second favorite
http://www.globalpolicy.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. this isn't new - u.s.: we are our own worst enemy - blowback
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Will the "Surge" hold long enough to make McLame look
like he was right? Will the American voters go along with the charade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. 1?) No 2?) with this electorate?-who the hell knows?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. As has been said many times since the Splurge began, we're arming both sides of a civil war
all sides really - and there's nothing good that can come from that.

This is Petraeus' doing. The civilian govt. leaders bear ultimate responsibility but the plan to secure a temporary peace with bribes and guns was Petraeus' formula for "pacifying" Sunni areas before he was made head honcho of US forces in Iraq. That's how he got the top job.

Rather than admit defeat, Petraeus and Bush have taken a million to one shot on building up all the combatants' armories while hoping somehow someway to induce these people who hate & fear each other to come together politically. There was NO REASON to ever think it could work. They just wanted it to, like they wanted WMDs to magically be there when they invaded Iraq. Eventually the lid must come off though, and when it does the slaughter will be all the greater.

I passed the point of exhaustion on Iraq long ways back - like most people I suppose. There really are no words to describe how stupid and brutish we've been and continue to be. War crimes tribunals were invented for atrocities like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. better word for it: Splurge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Glad Hedges read a little history of the region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Indeed
The K and the R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yet Republicans Don't Like Oversight, so the Troops will Have to Suffer
ideology over country. It's the Republican way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC