Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ben & Jerry's vs. Monsanto

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:26 AM
Original message
Ben & Jerry's vs. Monsanto
*NOTE- Ben& Jerry's was bought by Dutch conglomerate Unilever in 2000*


Ben & Jerry's Homemade, one of the first companies to label its ice cream as free of a synthetic hormone, is protesting a move by some states to restrict such labeling.

The South Burlington, Vt., ice-cream maker has joined a national campaign to block what critics say is an effort driven by Monsanto (MON, news, msgs), which markets recombinant bovine somatotropin, or rBST, also known as recombinant bovine growth hormone, or rBGH.

But a newly formed farmers' group, backed by Monsanto, is pushing for labeling changes, saying the hormone-free labels imply that the milk is safer than other milk, when they say it's not.

Monsanto, a corporate sponsor of the group, says it's a question of accuracy in labeling. <--- THEIR OWN PRODUCT?

"Monsanto is really an advocate in support of accurate labeling of dairy products in the dairy case," said Monsanto spokeswoman Lori Hoag.

Others say consumers have a right to know what is and isn't in their food.

The hormone, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration to boost production in dairy cows in the early 1990s, was not approved in Canada, Japan or the European Union, largely out of concerns it may be harmful to animals.

And "there are unanswered human questions with it. It probably should never have been approved," said Michael Hansen, a senior scientist with Consumers Union, which publishes Consumer Reports.

"As people worry about food they eat, the demand has increased," he said.

The use of the artificial hormones increases the levels of another growth hormone in cows, said Rick North, a spokesman for Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility, a leading critic of rBGH. Elevated levels of that hormone in humans promote cancer, he said.

"There is not absolute proof that shooting cows up with rBGH is increasing cancer rates in humans, however, there is a significant amount of scientific data that is pointing in that direction and our stance is better safe than sorry. That this is an unnecessary risk," said North.

"From the outset, when rBGH was approved, we wanted to make sure that we were able to tell that message on our packing that the family farmers that provide our dairy have pledged to not use rBGH," Michalak said. "We thought it was a very important message."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's ridiculous
They're putting a truthful label on their own product. There's absolutely no reason anyone else has the standing to interfere with this. If the others feel they look bad in comparison, perhaps they should take a hard look at their own products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. No different really from
a packet of nuts stating this product contains nuts - the truth !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Hell they had to dumb it down
they can only state that it DOESN'T have any rbhaor.aoasdo,sdo or whatever in it. They CAN'T (CAN'T mind you) put either their opinion of it or maybe a reference to where to find out more information on THEIR OWN PRODUCT????!?!?

That is corporate sponsored censorship.

I'll bet if it was a religous message it would be no problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Would you knowingly eat recombinant bovine somatotropin ?
Sounds like a strain of mad cow.

There's a brief history here of when Pillbury took on "The Boys - and lost.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_&_Jerry's

They did it by attacking the Dough Boy - Pillsbury's own corporate image
http://www.rezoom.com/money/from-the-vault/read/5679/

I'm think there might soon be some real funny T shirts around and about attacking Monsanto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. My wife is very particular
she always orders it on the side

:eyes:

No of course not but I should be able to KNOW WHAT THE *##* I AM FEEDING MY CHILD AND MYSELF
Thanks for the information. This thing is just absurd-note the law that doesn't allow you to state your opinion on your own product!!!! Oh but I bet you can put a religious message on it no problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Bad wikipedia link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazyriver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Monsanto made life miserable for Oakhurst Dairy here
here in Maine. Fuck Monsanto. Seems to be their MO.

I've been a loyal Oakhurst customer ever since I heard about the lawsuit.


http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLJ,GGLJ:2006-48,GGLJ:en&q=monsanto+vs+oakhurst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sentelle Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. There is already a label that guarantees rBGH free
Its called 'Organic'.

I won't touch non-organic milk. same reason i won't touch organic beef (namely I don't want the cows that touch my lips filled with crap.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Welcome to DU
:hi:

This post is

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. The hormone thing must be putting a dent into corporate dairy profits
Here's an idea: STOP using the fucking hormone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Are you one of them business geniuses?
'cause you sure are smart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. Monsanto is an environmental nightmare,
as well as a political and economic enemy.

Which is why I oppose them at every opportunity, and support politicians who are courageous enough to do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC