Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

tweety transcript

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:21 PM
Original message
tweety transcript
closed caption transcript:

Let's play "hardball."

>>> Good evening, I'm chris

matthews, welcome to "hardball."

Well, we're in a time of a lot

of frustration in this country,

iraq, of course, the lack of

health care for people that work

every day.

Gas prices going up, the

weakening economy that scares us

every day.

And I come on here every night

and try to wrestle with these

frustrations and also the

changes in our country.

We might soon have the first

woman president.

The first african-american

president or a man older than

we've ever elected before.

And, of course, we always treat

things here with hope, the

uniquely american hope that we

can actually make things better.

That we can make the greatest of

country, not only survive, but

as william faulkner said,

prevail.

In the midst of talking about

this, almost always without a

script and almost always on

tricky subjects of gender and

race and right and left and what

is in our country's interest and

who I think is telling the truth

and who I think isn't, I know

I'm dealing with sensitive

feelings.

I've accepted all of this as

part of the business I've

chosen.

This program, I'm proud to say

is tough, fearless, and, yes,

blunt.

I want people to react when I

say something.

I don't like saying things so

carefully and so politically

correctly that no one thinks

they've said anything.

What I've always counted on on

in all wild speeded up

conversations on

"hardball" and elsewhere on

television, is my good heart.

I don't care how personally

provocative out there, people

would know I'm not out against

them.

It was them I was rooting for.

While I was tough on individuals

who sought to lead the country,

I was not against the hopes we

all have for a fair shake.

In fact, a better deal for

people who have been held back

before we came along.

Some people I respect,

politically concerned people

like you who watch the show so

faithfully every night, people

who care about this country

think I've been disrespectful

to hillary clinton.

Not as a

candidate, but as a woman.

They point to something I said

on msnbc's "morning joe" the

morning after the new hampshire

primary, that her election to

the U.S. Senate and all that's

come since was a result of her

toughness, but also the sympathy

for her because her husband

embarrassed her by the conduct

that led to his impeachment.

Because he, and the words I

used, messed around.

The truth, of course, is

smarter, finer, larger than

that.

Yes, hillary clinton won

tremendous respect from the

country for the way she handled

the difficult months in 1998.

Her public approval numbers

spiked from the mid-40s up to

the 70s in one poll I looked at.

Why?

Because she stuck to her duty.

She performed strongly as first

lady.

She did such a wow of a job

campaigning for senate

candidates, especially chuck

schumer of new york, that she

was urged to run for a senate

seat there herself.

She might have well gotten that

far by another route and through

different circumstances, but

this is how it happens.

The rest is history.

How hillary went up to new york,

listened to people's concerns

and beat the odds as well as the

republicans to become a well

respected member of the U.S.

Senate.

I did say it right?

Was it fair to say that hillary

clinton took advantage of a

crisis to prove herself?

Was her conduct in 1998 a key to

starting her independent

electoral career the following

year?

Yes.

Was it fair to imply that

hillary's whole career depending

on being a victim of an

unfaithful husband?

No.

And that's what it sounded like

I was saying.

And it hurt people.

I'd like to think normally like

what I say.

In fact, normally like me.

As I said, I rely on my heart to

guide me in the heated,

fast-paced talk we have here on

"hardball."

A heart that bears only goodwill

toward people trying to make it

out there, especially those who

haven't before.

If my heart has not always

controlled my words, on those

occasions when I have not taken

the time to say things right or

have simply said the

inappropriate thing, I'll try to

be clearer, smarter, more

obviously in support of the

right of women, of all people,

the full equality and respect

for their ambitions.

So I get it.

>>> On the particular point, if

I'd said it the only reason john

mccain has come so far is that

he got shot down over north

vietnam and captured by the

enemy, I'd be brutally ignoring

the courage and guts he showed

in bearing up under his

captivity.

Saying that senator clinton got

where she got simply because her

husband did to her was callous,

and it comes across just as

nasty.

Worse yet, just as kmifive.

Finally, if anyone doesn't know

this, I love politics.

I love politicians.

I like and respect people with

the guts to put their name,

their very being out there for

public approval so that they can

lead our country.

And that goes for hillary and

barack and john and all the rest

who are willing to fight to take

on the toughest job in the world/

now let's get on with the show. whoa.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. what was that all about? Was this some sort of new personal comments section?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. he started the show with that.
several threads about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. i just got home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. someone took him to the woodshed at msnbc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. MSNBC must have gotten tons of email about his comments about
her getting sympathy for having been victimized by her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I expect so. His mouth had been seriously running away with him..
And his mentions of Hillary had been brutal, not politically, but in a gender specific way (calling her aids eunuchs, for instance...) I have no doubt it was brought to his attention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. David Brock/Media Matters publicly took chrissy to task for those comments about Ms. Clinton.
THAT's what that's about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R #1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. So...Twety responds to David Brock (Media Matters) campaign to get folks to
let Tweety know about how folks feel about his Women Hating Problems.

I don't know why...but his apologia...sort of comes off flat to my read. Let's hope he will do better in the future and this isn't as hollow as it sounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC